Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing
Abstract Traditional null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) incorporating the critical level of significance of 0.05 has become the cornerstone of decision‐making in health care, and nowhere less so than in obstetric and gynecological research. However, such practice is controversial. In partic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Philip M. Sedgwick, Anne Hammer, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Lars Henning Pedersen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14366 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
When controversies in null hypothesis significance testing prove to be controversial
by: Philip M. Sedgwick, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Artificial intelligence and dichotomania
by: Blakeley B. McShane, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
p < 0,05, ¿Criterio mágico para resolver cualquier problema o leyenda urbana?
by: Pedro Monterrey Gutiérrez
Published: (2012-08-01) -
The criterion of significance of general adaptive ability: numerical model
by: E. S. Rekashus, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
KNOWLEDGE-HOW, ABILITY, AND COUNTERFACTUAL SUCCESS. A STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION
by: Adrian LUDUŞAN
Published: (2020-08-01)