The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?

The EU has long had a goal of ‘reducing economic and social disparities.’ Since the reforms to the European Structural Funds in 1988 the Commission has encouraged enhanced subnational actor participation in policy-making, although subsequent reforms in 1993 and 1999 have been seen as attempts to ‘re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adrian Reilly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Institute of Romania 2004-07-01
Series:Romanian Journal of European Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol4_No2_The_EU_Structural_and_Cohesion_Funds_Solution_or_Smokescreen_to_Europes_Regional_Disparities.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427886290763776
author Adrian Reilly
author_facet Adrian Reilly
author_sort Adrian Reilly
collection DOAJ
description The EU has long had a goal of ‘reducing economic and social disparities.’ Since the reforms to the European Structural Funds in 1988 the Commission has encouraged enhanced subnational actor participation in policy-making, although subsequent reforms in 1993 and 1999 have been seen as attempts to ‘renationalize’ the policy. This paper argues that the minimal effect the Funds have had on the ground results not from renationalization but from inherent differences between multilevel actors on one of the key principles of Structural Funding i.e. partnership. The research findings show that whilst intergovernmental mechanisms have not changed since 1988, neither has the acceptance of the need for partnership between national and regional actors, especially in federal or quasi-federal states. The inability of the Funds to reduce disparities and the lack of understanding of partnership both provide lessons for new entrants to the EU: transforming domestic governance arrangements to accommodate the requirements of EU regional funding may only be successful if there are wider understandings of changes in ‘governance’; Europe’s poorer regions have not been able to close the gap with their richer neighbours with the implication that the regions of the Accession States will be in no better position in ten years time than they are now when compared to other regions throughout the EU.
format Article
id doaj-art-e747be5ec5474e31b26367e0c77b3879
institution Kabale University
issn 1582-8271
1841-4273
language English
publishDate 2004-07-01
publisher European Institute of Romania
record_format Article
series Romanian Journal of European Affairs
spelling doaj-art-e747be5ec5474e31b26367e0c77b38792025-08-20T03:28:53ZengEuropean Institute of RomaniaRomanian Journal of European Affairs1582-82711841-42732004-07-01424154The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?Adrian Reilly0Dr., Research Fellow in Devolution, Institute for German Studies, European Research Institute, University of Birmingham, UKThe EU has long had a goal of ‘reducing economic and social disparities.’ Since the reforms to the European Structural Funds in 1988 the Commission has encouraged enhanced subnational actor participation in policy-making, although subsequent reforms in 1993 and 1999 have been seen as attempts to ‘renationalize’ the policy. This paper argues that the minimal effect the Funds have had on the ground results not from renationalization but from inherent differences between multilevel actors on one of the key principles of Structural Funding i.e. partnership. The research findings show that whilst intergovernmental mechanisms have not changed since 1988, neither has the acceptance of the need for partnership between national and regional actors, especially in federal or quasi-federal states. The inability of the Funds to reduce disparities and the lack of understanding of partnership both provide lessons for new entrants to the EU: transforming domestic governance arrangements to accommodate the requirements of EU regional funding may only be successful if there are wider understandings of changes in ‘governance’; Europe’s poorer regions have not been able to close the gap with their richer neighbours with the implication that the regions of the Accession States will be in no better position in ten years time than they are now when compared to other regions throughout the EU.https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol4_No2_The_EU_Structural_and_Cohesion_Funds_Solution_or_Smokescreen_to_Europes_Regional_Disparities.pdfeuropean structural fundingmultilevel governanceregional disparity
spellingShingle Adrian Reilly
The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
Romanian Journal of European Affairs
european structural funding
multilevel governance
regional disparity
title The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
title_full The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
title_fullStr The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
title_full_unstemmed The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
title_short The EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Solution or Smokescreen to Europe’s Regional Disparities?
title_sort eu structural and cohesion funds solution or smokescreen to europe s regional disparities
topic european structural funding
multilevel governance
regional disparity
url https://rjea.ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/articole/RJEA_Vol4_No2_The_EU_Structural_and_Cohesion_Funds_Solution_or_Smokescreen_to_Europes_Regional_Disparities.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianreilly theeustructuralandcohesionfundssolutionorsmokescreentoeuropesregionaldisparities
AT adrianreilly eustructuralandcohesionfundssolutionorsmokescreentoeuropesregionaldisparities