Jesus and "the Daniel code"

It is suggested that Jesus, who understood his Messianic calling in the light of the OT prophecies, utilized their symbolic apocalyptic language in his prophetic discourse. From this perspective Matthew 26:64 sheds important light on the meaning of Matthew 24:30b, i.e. that those who rejected him w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. Thom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2011-12-01
Series:Acta Theologica
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2360
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858734478131200
author G. Thom
author_facet G. Thom
author_sort G. Thom
collection DOAJ
description It is suggested that Jesus, who understood his Messianic calling in the light of the OT prophecies, utilized their symbolic apocalyptic language in his prophetic discourse. From this perspective Matthew 26:64 sheds important light on the meaning of Matthew 24:30b, i.e. that those who rejected him would realize, within a relatively short period, that He – the Suffering Servant – was indeed the Son of Man of Daniel 7. But Jesus also made some very definite statements in very sober language about the future, which provide an important key for our understanding of the prophetic discourse. While He enumerated a number of signs that would warn his disciples of the approach of God’s judgment on Jerusalem – together constituting “the budding fig tree” – He emphasized, on the other hand, that there will be no signs to warn them of the approach of his parousia.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7349170394a4f7183b37e54db62dedc
institution Kabale University
issn 1015-8758
2309-9089
language English
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Theologica
spelling doaj-art-e7349170394a4f7183b37e54db62dedc2025-02-11T10:02:29ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892011-12-0131210.38140/at.v31i2.2360Jesus and "the Daniel code"G. Thom0University of Fort Hare, South Africa It is suggested that Jesus, who understood his Messianic calling in the light of the OT prophecies, utilized their symbolic apocalyptic language in his prophetic discourse. From this perspective Matthew 26:64 sheds important light on the meaning of Matthew 24:30b, i.e. that those who rejected him would realize, within a relatively short period, that He – the Suffering Servant – was indeed the Son of Man of Daniel 7. But Jesus also made some very definite statements in very sober language about the future, which provide an important key for our understanding of the prophetic discourse. While He enumerated a number of signs that would warn his disciples of the approach of God’s judgment on Jerusalem – together constituting “the budding fig tree” – He emphasized, on the other hand, that there will be no signs to warn them of the approach of his parousia. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2360
spellingShingle G. Thom
Jesus and "the Daniel code"
Acta Theologica
title Jesus and "the Daniel code"
title_full Jesus and "the Daniel code"
title_fullStr Jesus and "the Daniel code"
title_full_unstemmed Jesus and "the Daniel code"
title_short Jesus and "the Daniel code"
title_sort jesus and the daniel code
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2360
work_keys_str_mv AT gthom jesusandthedanielcode