Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature

Background. Risk factors (RFs) for the “disease” of low back pain (LBP) are probably different from the triggers of new episodes of LBP. Investigating RFs for the onset of the “disease” and the triggers of LBP is problematic if researchers fail to discern the different types of pain-free status of p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emad M. Ardakani, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Bruce F. Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6959631
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551223103848448
author Emad M. Ardakani
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Bruce F. Walker
author_facet Emad M. Ardakani
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Bruce F. Walker
author_sort Emad M. Ardakani
collection DOAJ
description Background. Risk factors (RFs) for the “disease” of low back pain (LBP) are probably different from the triggers of new episodes of LBP. Investigating RFs for the onset of the “disease” and the triggers of LBP is problematic if researchers fail to discern the different types of pain-free status of participants at and before baseline. There is a difference between never having had LBP and having been pain-free for a certain period only. In this review, we assessed the dependability of contemporary literature on RFs and triggers of LBP, in relation to the “disease” and the episodes, respectively. Methods. A literature search from 2010 until 2017 was performed. Information on the definitions of LBP, potential RFs/triggers, and study design was extracted. Studies were reclassified based on the type of LBP concerning the “disease,” episode, or mixed/unclear/chronic. RFs and triggers were grouped into major domains, and positive associations listed, respectively, for the “disease” and episodes. Results. In 42 of the included 47 articles, it was not clear if the authors investigated RFs for the “disease” of LBP or triggers of new episodes. Only one study properly reported RFs for the onset of the “disease” of LBP, and four studies were deemed suitable to investigate triggers for a new episode of LBP. No study reproduced the results of other included studies. Conclusion. Trustworthy information regarding RFs and triggers of LBP is rare in the current literature. Future research needs to use precise definitions of LBP (onset of the “disease” vs. episodes) and nominate the timing of the associated factors in relation to the types of LBP as these are two critical factors when studying causes of LBP.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7297b356b9045e1896534ad0e2049e4
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-e7297b356b9045e1896534ad0e2049e42025-02-03T06:04:43ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232019-01-01201910.1155/2019/69596316959631Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary LiteratureEmad M. Ardakani0Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde1Bruce F. Walker2College of Science, Health, Engineering, and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, AustraliaCollege of Science, Health, Engineering, and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, AustraliaCollege of Science, Health, Engineering, and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, AustraliaBackground. Risk factors (RFs) for the “disease” of low back pain (LBP) are probably different from the triggers of new episodes of LBP. Investigating RFs for the onset of the “disease” and the triggers of LBP is problematic if researchers fail to discern the different types of pain-free status of participants at and before baseline. There is a difference between never having had LBP and having been pain-free for a certain period only. In this review, we assessed the dependability of contemporary literature on RFs and triggers of LBP, in relation to the “disease” and the episodes, respectively. Methods. A literature search from 2010 until 2017 was performed. Information on the definitions of LBP, potential RFs/triggers, and study design was extracted. Studies were reclassified based on the type of LBP concerning the “disease,” episode, or mixed/unclear/chronic. RFs and triggers were grouped into major domains, and positive associations listed, respectively, for the “disease” and episodes. Results. In 42 of the included 47 articles, it was not clear if the authors investigated RFs for the “disease” of LBP or triggers of new episodes. Only one study properly reported RFs for the onset of the “disease” of LBP, and four studies were deemed suitable to investigate triggers for a new episode of LBP. No study reproduced the results of other included studies. Conclusion. Trustworthy information regarding RFs and triggers of LBP is rare in the current literature. Future research needs to use precise definitions of LBP (onset of the “disease” vs. episodes) and nominate the timing of the associated factors in relation to the types of LBP as these are two critical factors when studying causes of LBP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6959631
spellingShingle Emad M. Ardakani
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Bruce F. Walker
Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
Pain Research and Management
title Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
title_full Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
title_fullStr Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
title_full_unstemmed Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
title_short Can We Trust the Literature on Risk Factors and Triggers for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of a Sample of Contemporary Literature
title_sort can we trust the literature on risk factors and triggers for low back pain a systematic review of a sample of contemporary literature
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6959631
work_keys_str_mv AT emadmardakani canwetrusttheliteratureonriskfactorsandtriggersforlowbackpainasystematicreviewofasampleofcontemporaryliterature
AT charlotteleboeufyde canwetrusttheliteratureonriskfactorsandtriggersforlowbackpainasystematicreviewofasampleofcontemporaryliterature
AT brucefwalker canwetrusttheliteratureonriskfactorsandtriggersforlowbackpainasystematicreviewofasampleofcontemporaryliterature