DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY?
Decision-making professionals, such as economists, accountants and business majors, are usually taught the general economic principle that when evaluating the costs of a decision, the decision maker should consider only those costs that are actually incurred as a result of making that decision, and...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kwara State University, Malete Nigeria
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Malete Journal of Accounting and Finance |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://majaf.com.ng/index.php/majaf/article/view/63 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823859651513417728 |
|---|---|
| author | Musa Ilias Biala |
| author_facet | Musa Ilias Biala |
| author_sort | Musa Ilias Biala |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Decision-making professionals, such as economists, accountants and business majors, are usually taught the general economic principle that when evaluating the costs of a decision, the decision maker should consider only those costs that are actually incurred as a result of making that decision, and that sunk costs should be ignored. However, there has been considerable anecdotal evidence that many of these decision-making professionals honour sunk costs in their decisions. Some studies have provided evidence in support of the anecdotal evidence while some have refuted the evidence. In order to shed more light on this topic, this paper, therefore, examines whether these decision-making professionals too are adversely influenced by sunk costs when making their decisions. By carrying out proportion tests on 156 respondents and estimating a binary logit model for two decision-making vignettes, this study found that the selected professional decision makers committed the sunk cost fallacy, and that the amount (or size) of the sunk cost was a major significant determinant of the susceptibility to sunk-cost fallacy. The study also found that the proportion of professional decision makers who committed the fallacy differed according to the nature of the decision. These findings suggest that having background knowledge about sunk cost does not preclude individuals from committing the fallacy and that susceptibility of a decision maker to sunk-cost fallacy depends on the nature of the decision being made.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e71a6dc90baf437799e3841a86521d26 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2735-9603 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | Kwara State University, Malete Nigeria |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Malete Journal of Accounting and Finance |
| spelling | doaj-art-e71a6dc90baf437799e3841a86521d262025-02-10T23:06:37ZengKwara State University, Malete NigeriaMalete Journal of Accounting and Finance2735-96032023-11-0131DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY?Musa Ilias Biala0Kwara State University, Malete Decision-making professionals, such as economists, accountants and business majors, are usually taught the general economic principle that when evaluating the costs of a decision, the decision maker should consider only those costs that are actually incurred as a result of making that decision, and that sunk costs should be ignored. However, there has been considerable anecdotal evidence that many of these decision-making professionals honour sunk costs in their decisions. Some studies have provided evidence in support of the anecdotal evidence while some have refuted the evidence. In order to shed more light on this topic, this paper, therefore, examines whether these decision-making professionals too are adversely influenced by sunk costs when making their decisions. By carrying out proportion tests on 156 respondents and estimating a binary logit model for two decision-making vignettes, this study found that the selected professional decision makers committed the sunk cost fallacy, and that the amount (or size) of the sunk cost was a major significant determinant of the susceptibility to sunk-cost fallacy. The study also found that the proportion of professional decision makers who committed the fallacy differed according to the nature of the decision. These findings suggest that having background knowledge about sunk cost does not preclude individuals from committing the fallacy and that susceptibility of a decision maker to sunk-cost fallacy depends on the nature of the decision being made. https://majaf.com.ng/index.php/majaf/article/view/63Decision makingProspect theorySunk cost |
| spellingShingle | Musa Ilias Biala DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? Malete Journal of Accounting and Finance Decision making Prospect theory Sunk cost |
| title | DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? |
| title_full | DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? |
| title_fullStr | DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? |
| title_full_unstemmed | DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? |
| title_short | DO DECISION-MAKING PROFESSIONALS COMMIT THE SUNK-COST FALLACY? |
| title_sort | do decision making professionals commit the sunk cost fallacy |
| topic | Decision making Prospect theory Sunk cost |
| url | https://majaf.com.ng/index.php/majaf/article/view/63 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT musailiasbiala dodecisionmakingprofessionalscommitthesunkcostfallacy |