Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost

Background and purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, comparing cohorts with and without intraprostatic boost (IPB) to assess feasibility and safety of IPB, with particular attention to urethral and bladder dose and tox...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nisha Bhargava, Martina Hurwitz, Josephine Levey, Lily Bennett, Joseph A. Aronovitz, Daniel R. Schmidt, Jonathan W. Lischalk, Irving D. Kaplan, Nima Aghdam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000850
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850043020832931840
author Nisha Bhargava
Martina Hurwitz
Josephine Levey
Lily Bennett
Joseph A. Aronovitz
Daniel R. Schmidt
Jonathan W. Lischalk
Irving D. Kaplan
Nima Aghdam
author_facet Nisha Bhargava
Martina Hurwitz
Josephine Levey
Lily Bennett
Joseph A. Aronovitz
Daniel R. Schmidt
Jonathan W. Lischalk
Irving D. Kaplan
Nima Aghdam
author_sort Nisha Bhargava
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, comparing cohorts with and without intraprostatic boost (IPB) to assess feasibility and safety of IPB, with particular attention to urethral and bladder dose and toxicity. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 349 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2018 and 2023. Of these, 266 received SBRT with IPB, and 83 received SBRT without IPB. Patients were treated using a robotic SBRT platform with fiducial tracking. Dosimetric parameters for the urethra, including D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, including D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy, were evaluated. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using CTCAE criteria. Results: For the urethra, median values for D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, median values D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy were compared and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Late urinary toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2.25 % of patients in the IPB group and 2.47 % in the no IPB group, with no grade 3 acute toxicities reported. Discussion: These findings support the use of SBRT using an IPB as a feasible and safe approach to achieve focal dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) without significantly increasing urethra or bladder dose or toxicity. Future research should focus on standardizing DIL contouring, exploring adaptive planning techniques to increase accuracy, and prospectively studying toxicity and quality of life in patients treated with IPB with SBRT.
format Article
id doaj-art-e6bdc2d390a845538f00c03ff56829e4
institution DOAJ
issn 2405-6308
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-e6bdc2d390a845538f00c03ff56829e42025-08-20T02:55:20ZengElsevierClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology2405-63082025-09-015410099310.1016/j.ctro.2025.100993Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boostNisha Bhargava0Martina Hurwitz1Josephine Levey2Lily Bennett3Joseph A. Aronovitz4Daniel R. Schmidt5Jonathan W. Lischalk6Irving D. Kaplan7Nima Aghdam8Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Boston, Weymouth MA USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Medicine, MedStar-Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, NY, USA; NYCyberknife at Perlmutter Cancer Center -Manhattan, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding author at: 150 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10023, USA.Background and purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, comparing cohorts with and without intraprostatic boost (IPB) to assess feasibility and safety of IPB, with particular attention to urethral and bladder dose and toxicity. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 349 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2018 and 2023. Of these, 266 received SBRT with IPB, and 83 received SBRT without IPB. Patients were treated using a robotic SBRT platform with fiducial tracking. Dosimetric parameters for the urethra, including D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, including D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy, were evaluated. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using CTCAE criteria. Results: For the urethra, median values for D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, median values D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy were compared and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Late urinary toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2.25 % of patients in the IPB group and 2.47 % in the no IPB group, with no grade 3 acute toxicities reported. Discussion: These findings support the use of SBRT using an IPB as a feasible and safe approach to achieve focal dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) without significantly increasing urethra or bladder dose or toxicity. Future research should focus on standardizing DIL contouring, exploring adaptive planning techniques to increase accuracy, and prospectively studying toxicity and quality of life in patients treated with IPB with SBRT.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000850Prostatic neoplasmsStereotactic body radiation therapyDominant intraprostatic lesionFocal dose escalationUrinary toxicityUrethral dose constraint
spellingShingle Nisha Bhargava
Martina Hurwitz
Josephine Levey
Lily Bennett
Joseph A. Aronovitz
Daniel R. Schmidt
Jonathan W. Lischalk
Irving D. Kaplan
Nima Aghdam
Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Prostatic neoplasms
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Dominant intraprostatic lesion
Focal dose escalation
Urinary toxicity
Urethral dose constraint
title Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
title_full Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
title_fullStr Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
title_full_unstemmed Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
title_short Urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with and without intra-prostatic boost
title_sort urethral and bladder dosimetry and urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing sbrt with and without intra prostatic boost
topic Prostatic neoplasms
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Dominant intraprostatic lesion
Focal dose escalation
Urinary toxicity
Urethral dose constraint
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000850
work_keys_str_mv AT nishabhargava urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT martinahurwitz urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT josephinelevey urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT lilybennett urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT josephaaronovitz urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT danielrschmidt urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT jonathanwlischalk urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT irvingdkaplan urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost
AT nimaaghdam urethralandbladderdosimetryandurinarytoxicityinprostatecancerpatientsundergoingsbrtwithandwithoutintraprostaticboost