Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Introduction and Hypothesis. We sought to determine the mesh extrusion (vaginal exposure) rates and subject outcomes following IntePro (Type I polypropylene) mesh “kit” repairs for vaginal prolapse. Methods. Data were pooled from two prospective multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James C. Lukban, Roger D. Beyer, Robert D. Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/354897
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551769757974528
author James C. Lukban
Roger D. Beyer
Robert D. Moore
author_facet James C. Lukban
Roger D. Beyer
Robert D. Moore
author_sort James C. Lukban
collection DOAJ
description Introduction and Hypothesis. We sought to determine the mesh extrusion (vaginal exposure) rates and subject outcomes following IntePro (Type I polypropylene) mesh “kit” repairs for vaginal prolapse. Methods. Data were pooled from two prospective multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Perigee and Apogee (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minn, USA) to treat anterior and posterior/apical prolapses, respectively. Extrusions involving the anterior compartment (AC) or posterior compartment/apex (PC/A) were recorded. Results. Two hundred sixty women underwent mesh placement, with a total of 368 mesh units inserted (173 in the AC and 195 in the PC/A). Extrusions were noted in 13 (7.5%) of AC implants and 27 (13.8%) of PC/A implants through 12 months. No difference was seen between those with and without extrusion in regard to anatomic cure, postoperative painor quality of life at 1 year. Conclusions. Extrusion had no apparent effect on short-term outcomes. Given the unknown long-term sequellae of vaginal mesh exposure, a thorough assessment of risks and benefits of transvaginal mesh placement should be considered at the time of preoperative planning.
format Article
id doaj-art-e68b226e81954ac18bd5ac129cc52872
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9589
1687-9597
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
spelling doaj-art-e68b226e81954ac18bd5ac129cc528722025-02-03T06:00:37ZengWileyObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972012-01-01201210.1155/2012/354897354897Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ ProlapseJames C. Lukban0Roger D. Beyer1Robert D. Moore2Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 310, Norfolk, VA 23507, USAWomen's Health Care Specialists, PC, 7110 Stadium Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49009, USAAtlanta Urogynecology Associates, 3400 Old Milton Parkway, Building C, Suite 330, Alpharetta, GA 30005, USAIntroduction and Hypothesis. We sought to determine the mesh extrusion (vaginal exposure) rates and subject outcomes following IntePro (Type I polypropylene) mesh “kit” repairs for vaginal prolapse. Methods. Data were pooled from two prospective multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Perigee and Apogee (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minn, USA) to treat anterior and posterior/apical prolapses, respectively. Extrusions involving the anterior compartment (AC) or posterior compartment/apex (PC/A) were recorded. Results. Two hundred sixty women underwent mesh placement, with a total of 368 mesh units inserted (173 in the AC and 195 in the PC/A). Extrusions were noted in 13 (7.5%) of AC implants and 27 (13.8%) of PC/A implants through 12 months. No difference was seen between those with and without extrusion in regard to anatomic cure, postoperative painor quality of life at 1 year. Conclusions. Extrusion had no apparent effect on short-term outcomes. Given the unknown long-term sequellae of vaginal mesh exposure, a thorough assessment of risks and benefits of transvaginal mesh placement should be considered at the time of preoperative planning.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/354897
spellingShingle James C. Lukban
Roger D. Beyer
Robert D. Moore
Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
title Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_fullStr Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_short Incidence of Extrusion Following Type I Polypropylene Mesh “Kit” Repairs in the Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_sort incidence of extrusion following type i polypropylene mesh kit repairs in the correction of pelvic organ prolapse
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/354897
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesclukban incidenceofextrusionfollowingtypeipolypropylenemeshkitrepairsinthecorrectionofpelvicorganprolapse
AT rogerdbeyer incidenceofextrusionfollowingtypeipolypropylenemeshkitrepairsinthecorrectionofpelvicorganprolapse
AT robertdmoore incidenceofextrusionfollowingtypeipolypropylenemeshkitrepairsinthecorrectionofpelvicorganprolapse