To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers
While it is widely acknowledged that co-design will enhance project outcomes, including for digital health innovation, the definition and application of co-design remain heterogenous. Efforts to systematise co-design as a meaningful and rigorous methodology, have been made over the past decades usin...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Digital Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251339302 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850190360131665920 |
|---|---|
| author | Mahima Kalla Kit Huckvale Ashleigh Bradford Verena Schadewaldt Sarah C. E. Bray Ann Borda Kara Burns Heidi McAlpine Joseph Thomas Daniel Capurro Richard De Abreu Lourenco Sarah Cain Wendy Chapman James R. Whittle Katharine J. Drummond Meinir Krishnasamy |
| author_facet | Mahima Kalla Kit Huckvale Ashleigh Bradford Verena Schadewaldt Sarah C. E. Bray Ann Borda Kara Burns Heidi McAlpine Joseph Thomas Daniel Capurro Richard De Abreu Lourenco Sarah Cain Wendy Chapman James R. Whittle Katharine J. Drummond Meinir Krishnasamy |
| author_sort | Mahima Kalla |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | While it is widely acknowledged that co-design will enhance project outcomes, including for digital health innovation, the definition and application of co-design remain heterogenous. Efforts to systematise co-design as a meaningful and rigorous methodology, have been made over the past decades using co-design frameworks. However, we find that co-design frameworks present challenges when operational contexts are complex, and research problems nebulous, as is often the case in digital health research and development initiatives. Here, we present our experience of co-designing a self-guided supportive care digital health platform for Australians affected by brain tumours, called ‘Brain Tumours Online’. The Brain Tumours Online platform seeks to mitigate unmet supportive care needs of patients and their carers through a three-pronged approach: a repository of evidence-based information, an online peer support community, and a directory of validated digital therapeutic tools. Our co-design approach for this platform was influenced by three key contextual considerations: a) disparate operating models and competing priorities of partner organisations; b) patient population-specific needs; and c) the need to practice epistemic flexibility and adaptation to evolving project needs. Instead of following a standardised co-design framework, we adopted methodological pluralism, with a bespoke multi-modal co-design approach. This approach allowed us to combine strengths of various stakeholders and mitigate organisational barriers of working across sectors, characteristic of digital health initiatives in healthcare. Layperson summary In the realm of digital health innovation, co-design is recognized as crucial for achieving successful outcomes. Co-design refers to a participatory method whereby stakeholders, such as patients and carers, collaborate with design professionals to design solutions for problems. In the past, applying co-design methods has proved to be challenging, as there exist many different interpretations and contexts. In this paper, we reflect on the complexities we experienced when co-designing a supportive care digital health platform for Australians affected by brain tumours. Challenges encountered during this study included differing organizational priorities among partners, specific needs of patients, and the necessity for adaptable methods that respond to evolving project demands. To address these challenges, we used a variety of methods instead of adhering to a single systematized co-design framework. Our experience highlights how incorporating adaptability and engaging with different stakeholders in flexible ways can lead to better outcomes for digital health projects. By sharing what we have learned, we hope to encourage more flexible and collaborative approaches in digital health innovation, which can make treatments and tools more effective and useful for everyone involved. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e651f2f2bca144cb9d423c9ae0e8946b |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2055-2076 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Digital Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-e651f2f2bca144cb9d423c9ae0e8946b2025-08-20T02:15:19ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762025-05-011110.1177/20552076251339302To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carersMahima Kalla0Kit Huckvale1Ashleigh Bradford2Verena Schadewaldt3Sarah C. E. Bray4Ann Borda5Kara Burns6Heidi McAlpine7Joseph Thomas8Daniel Capurro9Richard De Abreu Lourenco10Sarah Cain11Wendy Chapman12James R. Whittle13Katharine J. Drummond14Meinir Krishnasamy15 Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC Department of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC, Australia Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, , Ultimo, NSW, Australia Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, , Ultimo, NSW, Australia Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, , Parkville, VIC Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaWhile it is widely acknowledged that co-design will enhance project outcomes, including for digital health innovation, the definition and application of co-design remain heterogenous. Efforts to systematise co-design as a meaningful and rigorous methodology, have been made over the past decades using co-design frameworks. However, we find that co-design frameworks present challenges when operational contexts are complex, and research problems nebulous, as is often the case in digital health research and development initiatives. Here, we present our experience of co-designing a self-guided supportive care digital health platform for Australians affected by brain tumours, called ‘Brain Tumours Online’. The Brain Tumours Online platform seeks to mitigate unmet supportive care needs of patients and their carers through a three-pronged approach: a repository of evidence-based information, an online peer support community, and a directory of validated digital therapeutic tools. Our co-design approach for this platform was influenced by three key contextual considerations: a) disparate operating models and competing priorities of partner organisations; b) patient population-specific needs; and c) the need to practice epistemic flexibility and adaptation to evolving project needs. Instead of following a standardised co-design framework, we adopted methodological pluralism, with a bespoke multi-modal co-design approach. This approach allowed us to combine strengths of various stakeholders and mitigate organisational barriers of working across sectors, characteristic of digital health initiatives in healthcare. Layperson summary In the realm of digital health innovation, co-design is recognized as crucial for achieving successful outcomes. Co-design refers to a participatory method whereby stakeholders, such as patients and carers, collaborate with design professionals to design solutions for problems. In the past, applying co-design methods has proved to be challenging, as there exist many different interpretations and contexts. In this paper, we reflect on the complexities we experienced when co-designing a supportive care digital health platform for Australians affected by brain tumours. Challenges encountered during this study included differing organizational priorities among partners, specific needs of patients, and the necessity for adaptable methods that respond to evolving project demands. To address these challenges, we used a variety of methods instead of adhering to a single systematized co-design framework. Our experience highlights how incorporating adaptability and engaging with different stakeholders in flexible ways can lead to better outcomes for digital health projects. By sharing what we have learned, we hope to encourage more flexible and collaborative approaches in digital health innovation, which can make treatments and tools more effective and useful for everyone involved.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251339302 |
| spellingShingle | Mahima Kalla Kit Huckvale Ashleigh Bradford Verena Schadewaldt Sarah C. E. Bray Ann Borda Kara Burns Heidi McAlpine Joseph Thomas Daniel Capurro Richard De Abreu Lourenco Sarah Cain Wendy Chapman James R. Whittle Katharine J. Drummond Meinir Krishnasamy To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers Digital Health |
| title | To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| title_full | To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| title_fullStr | To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| title_full_unstemmed | To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| title_short | To framework, or not to framework? Reflections from co-design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| title_sort | to framework or not to framework reflections from co design of a digital supportive care platform for patients with brain tumours and their carers |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251339302 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mahimakalla toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT kithuckvale toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT ashleighbradford toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT verenaschadewaldt toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT sarahcebray toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT annborda toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT karaburns toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT heidimcalpine toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT josephthomas toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT danielcapurro toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT richarddeabreulourenco toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT sarahcain toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT wendychapman toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT jamesrwhittle toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT katharinejdrummond toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers AT meinirkrishnasamy toframeworkornottoframeworkreflectionsfromcodesignofadigitalsupportivecareplatformforpatientswithbraintumoursandtheircarers |