DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?

Objective: To date, there are only few systematic reports on the quality of DNA extracted from routine diagnostic cytologic specimens. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the ability of 50% ethanol/2% carbowax (Saccomanno fixative) to preserve bronchial secretions with high quality genom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans Jürgen Grote, Viola Schmiemann, Mario Sarbia, Alfred Böcking
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003-01-01
Series:Analytical Cellular Pathology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/354796
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563949426442240
author Hans Jürgen Grote
Viola Schmiemann
Mario Sarbia
Alfred Böcking
author_facet Hans Jürgen Grote
Viola Schmiemann
Mario Sarbia
Alfred Böcking
author_sort Hans Jürgen Grote
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To date, there are only few systematic reports on the quality of DNA extracted from routine diagnostic cytologic specimens. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the ability of 50% ethanol/2% carbowax (Saccomanno fixative) to preserve bronchial secretions with high quality genomic DNA as well as to compare different DNA extraction methods. Methods: DNA was extracted from 45 bronchial aspirates by four different extraction protocols. Beside DNA yield, DNA quality with regard to purity, integrity, and PCR success rate were investigated. Results: No fragmentation of sample DNA due to the fixative was detected. It was preserved as high molecular weight DNA. DNA yield, purity, and integrity were dependent on the DNA extraction method to some extend. Irrespective of the DNA extraction method the PCR success rate for amplification of β‐globin gene fragments (268, 536, and 989 bp) was 100%. Conclusions: A fixative containing 50% ethanol/2% carbowax preserves high quality DNA which is well suited for PCR‐based assays regardless of the extraction protocol used. The selection of the DNA extraction protocol has to be adjusted to the circumstances of application.
format Article
id doaj-art-e627bfadda8e469887a9493bb05e6ec4
institution Kabale University
issn 0921-8912
1878-3651
language English
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Analytical Cellular Pathology
spelling doaj-art-e627bfadda8e469887a9493bb05e6ec42025-02-03T01:12:10ZengWileyAnalytical Cellular Pathology0921-89121878-36512003-01-01252838810.1155/2003/354796DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?Hans Jürgen Grote0Viola Schmiemann1Mario Sarbia2Alfred Böcking3Institute of Cytopathology, Heinrich‐Heine‐University, Moorenstrasse 5, D‐40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Cytopathology, Heinrich‐Heine‐University, Moorenstrasse 5, D‐40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich‐Heine‐University, Moorenstrasse 5, D‐40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Cytopathology, Heinrich‐Heine‐University, Moorenstrasse 5, D‐40225 Düsseldorf, GermanyObjective: To date, there are only few systematic reports on the quality of DNA extracted from routine diagnostic cytologic specimens. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the ability of 50% ethanol/2% carbowax (Saccomanno fixative) to preserve bronchial secretions with high quality genomic DNA as well as to compare different DNA extraction methods. Methods: DNA was extracted from 45 bronchial aspirates by four different extraction protocols. Beside DNA yield, DNA quality with regard to purity, integrity, and PCR success rate were investigated. Results: No fragmentation of sample DNA due to the fixative was detected. It was preserved as high molecular weight DNA. DNA yield, purity, and integrity were dependent on the DNA extraction method to some extend. Irrespective of the DNA extraction method the PCR success rate for amplification of β‐globin gene fragments (268, 536, and 989 bp) was 100%. Conclusions: A fixative containing 50% ethanol/2% carbowax preserves high quality DNA which is well suited for PCR‐based assays regardless of the extraction protocol used. The selection of the DNA extraction protocol has to be adjusted to the circumstances of application.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/354796
spellingShingle Hans Jürgen Grote
Viola Schmiemann
Mario Sarbia
Alfred Böcking
DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
Analytical Cellular Pathology
title DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
title_full DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
title_fullStr DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
title_full_unstemmed DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
title_short DNA Extraction from Bronchial Aspirates for Molecular Cytology: Which Method to Take?
title_sort dna extraction from bronchial aspirates for molecular cytology which method to take
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/354796
work_keys_str_mv AT hansjurgengrote dnaextractionfrombronchialaspiratesformolecularcytologywhichmethodtotake
AT violaschmiemann dnaextractionfrombronchialaspiratesformolecularcytologywhichmethodtotake
AT mariosarbia dnaextractionfrombronchialaspiratesformolecularcytologywhichmethodtotake
AT alfredbocking dnaextractionfrombronchialaspiratesformolecularcytologywhichmethodtotake