Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role of indoor environments on disease transmission. However, our understanding of how transmission occurred evolved as the pandemic progressed. Enclosed spaces where pathogen-laden aerosols accumulate were strongly linked to increased transmission events. Most...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314002 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850129358703820800 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandra Goldblatt Michael J Loccisano Mazharul I Mahe John J Dennehy Fabrizio Spagnolo |
| author_facet | Alexandra Goldblatt Michael J Loccisano Mazharul I Mahe John J Dennehy Fabrizio Spagnolo |
| author_sort | Alexandra Goldblatt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role of indoor environments on disease transmission. However, our understanding of how transmission occurred evolved as the pandemic progressed. Enclosed spaces where pathogen-laden aerosols accumulate were strongly linked to increased transmission events. Most classrooms, particulalry in the U.S., do not have any mechanical ventilation systems but do have many people congregating indoors for long periods of time. Here we employ a safe, non-pathogenic surrogate virus, the bacteriophage phi6, to interrogate aerosol transmission in classroom environments that do not have any natural or mechanical ventilation in order to provide baseline understanding of how effectively aerosols facilitate new infections. We measure exposure risk using a modified passive monitoring technique compliant with applicable standards, including ISO 14698-1:2003. We find that virus-laden aerosols establish new infections over all distances tested within minutes and that the time of exposure did not change transmission rate. We further find that relative humidity, but not temperature nor a UV-based disinfection device, significantly lowered transmission rates. Our data suggest that, even without mechanical ventilation, relative humidity remains an inexpensive and highly effective mitigation strategy while UV air treatment may not. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e61ee9a32eb440d994da194d38ee1cf7 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-e61ee9a32eb440d994da194d38ee1cf72025-08-20T02:33:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011911e031400210.1371/journal.pone.0314002Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation.Alexandra GoldblattMichael J LoccisanoMazharul I MaheJohn J DennehyFabrizio SpagnoloThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role of indoor environments on disease transmission. However, our understanding of how transmission occurred evolved as the pandemic progressed. Enclosed spaces where pathogen-laden aerosols accumulate were strongly linked to increased transmission events. Most classrooms, particulalry in the U.S., do not have any mechanical ventilation systems but do have many people congregating indoors for long periods of time. Here we employ a safe, non-pathogenic surrogate virus, the bacteriophage phi6, to interrogate aerosol transmission in classroom environments that do not have any natural or mechanical ventilation in order to provide baseline understanding of how effectively aerosols facilitate new infections. We measure exposure risk using a modified passive monitoring technique compliant with applicable standards, including ISO 14698-1:2003. We find that virus-laden aerosols establish new infections over all distances tested within minutes and that the time of exposure did not change transmission rate. We further find that relative humidity, but not temperature nor a UV-based disinfection device, significantly lowered transmission rates. Our data suggest that, even without mechanical ventilation, relative humidity remains an inexpensive and highly effective mitigation strategy while UV air treatment may not.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314002 |
| spellingShingle | Alexandra Goldblatt Michael J Loccisano Mazharul I Mahe John J Dennehy Fabrizio Spagnolo Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. |
| title_full | Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. |
| title_fullStr | Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. |
| title_short | Risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation. |
| title_sort | risk of infection due to airborne virus in classroom environments lacking mechanical ventilation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314002 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandragoldblatt riskofinfectionduetoairbornevirusinclassroomenvironmentslackingmechanicalventilation AT michaeljloccisano riskofinfectionduetoairbornevirusinclassroomenvironmentslackingmechanicalventilation AT mazharulimahe riskofinfectionduetoairbornevirusinclassroomenvironmentslackingmechanicalventilation AT johnjdennehy riskofinfectionduetoairbornevirusinclassroomenvironmentslackingmechanicalventilation AT fabriziospagnolo riskofinfectionduetoairbornevirusinclassroomenvironmentslackingmechanicalventilation |