Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing

ABSTRACT Background Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) affects one in eight people over 50, yet its impact on foot and lower limb kinematics remains poorly understood. This study compared foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing between people with and without symptomatic radi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merridy J. Lithgow, Jayishni N. Maharaj, Andrew K. Buldt, Shannon E. Munteanu, Benjamin F. Mentiplay, Hylton B. Menz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70054
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849418082281324544
author Merridy J. Lithgow
Jayishni N. Maharaj
Andrew K. Buldt
Shannon E. Munteanu
Benjamin F. Mentiplay
Hylton B. Menz
author_facet Merridy J. Lithgow
Jayishni N. Maharaj
Andrew K. Buldt
Shannon E. Munteanu
Benjamin F. Mentiplay
Hylton B. Menz
author_sort Merridy J. Lithgow
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) affects one in eight people over 50, yet its impact on foot and lower limb kinematics remains poorly understood. This study compared foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA. Methods Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks and radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints. Cases aged ≥ 45 years were matched 1:1 for sex and age (± 5 years) to controls. A 10‐camera motion analysis system was used to capture foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing, which were analysed with a validated multi‐segmental lower limb model. Group differences were analysed using independent samples t‐tests and effect sizes for discrete angles, whereas statistical parametric mapping compared kinematic patterns between groups. Results We included 24 midfoot OA cases (mean age 64.4, SD 9.5) matched to 24 controls (mean age 65.2, SD 10.1). During level walking, people with midfoot OA walked slower and displayed absolute joint angles that showed less hip extension throughout stance, less knee flexion in early and late stance, less ankle dorsiflexion throughout stance (medium to large effects), greater subtalar pronation in late stance, and greater tarsometatarsal supination during early stance (medium effects). There were few differences during stair ascent and descent. Conclusion People with midfoot OA walk slower and demonstrate medium to large differences in sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle kinematics, and medium differences in subtalar and tarsometatarsal kinematics. These findings offer insights into the walking patterns of people with midfoot OA and the mechanisms that may contribute to or result from the condition. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the temporal relationship between these factors and midfoot OA development.
format Article
id doaj-art-e61e00fd09ea4b899200f7d25a80d50e
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-1146
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
spelling doaj-art-e61e00fd09ea4b899200f7d25a80d50e2025-08-20T03:32:32ZengWileyJournal of Foot and Ankle Research1757-11462025-06-01182n/an/a10.1002/jfa2.70054Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair ClimbingMerridy J. Lithgow0Jayishni N. Maharaj1Andrew K. Buldt2Shannon E. Munteanu3Benjamin F. Mentiplay4Hylton B. Menz5Discipline of Podiatry School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Victoria AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work Griffith University Gold Coast AustraliaDiscipline of Podiatry School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Victoria AustraliaDiscipline of Podiatry School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Victoria AustraliaDiscipline of Sport and Exercise Science School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Victoria AustraliaDiscipline of Podiatry School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Victoria AustraliaABSTRACT Background Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) affects one in eight people over 50, yet its impact on foot and lower limb kinematics remains poorly understood. This study compared foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing between people with and without symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA. Methods Symptomatic radiographic midfoot OA was defined as midfoot pain in the last 4 weeks and radiographic OA in one or more midfoot joints. Cases aged ≥ 45 years were matched 1:1 for sex and age (± 5 years) to controls. A 10‐camera motion analysis system was used to capture foot and lower limb kinematics during level walking and stair climbing, which were analysed with a validated multi‐segmental lower limb model. Group differences were analysed using independent samples t‐tests and effect sizes for discrete angles, whereas statistical parametric mapping compared kinematic patterns between groups. Results We included 24 midfoot OA cases (mean age 64.4, SD 9.5) matched to 24 controls (mean age 65.2, SD 10.1). During level walking, people with midfoot OA walked slower and displayed absolute joint angles that showed less hip extension throughout stance, less knee flexion in early and late stance, less ankle dorsiflexion throughout stance (medium to large effects), greater subtalar pronation in late stance, and greater tarsometatarsal supination during early stance (medium effects). There were few differences during stair ascent and descent. Conclusion People with midfoot OA walk slower and demonstrate medium to large differences in sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle kinematics, and medium differences in subtalar and tarsometatarsal kinematics. These findings offer insights into the walking patterns of people with midfoot OA and the mechanisms that may contribute to or result from the condition. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the temporal relationship between these factors and midfoot OA development.https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70054biomechanical phenomenafootfoot jointsgaitmidfootosteoarthritis
spellingShingle Merridy J. Lithgow
Jayishni N. Maharaj
Andrew K. Buldt
Shannon E. Munteanu
Benjamin F. Mentiplay
Hylton B. Menz
Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
biomechanical phenomena
foot
foot joints
gait
midfoot
osteoarthritis
title Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
title_full Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
title_fullStr Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
title_full_unstemmed Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
title_short Lower Limb Kinematics of People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis During Level Walking and Stair Climbing
title_sort lower limb kinematics of people with midfoot osteoarthritis during level walking and stair climbing
topic biomechanical phenomena
foot
foot joints
gait
midfoot
osteoarthritis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70054
work_keys_str_mv AT merridyjlithgow lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing
AT jayishninmaharaj lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing
AT andrewkbuldt lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing
AT shannonemunteanu lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing
AT benjaminfmentiplay lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing
AT hyltonbmenz lowerlimbkinematicsofpeoplewithmidfootosteoarthritisduringlevelwalkingandstairclimbing