Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público
The Act 40/2015 of the legal regime of the Public Sector has introduced a new rule on the calculation of the limitation period to be applied to sanctions in cases where hierarchichal appeal filed against them had been rejected by administrative silence. Thus, within the meaning of section 30.3 of th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP)
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Revista Vasca de Administración Pública |
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850159197667196928 |
|---|---|
| author | Carmen Chinchilla Marín |
| author_facet | Carmen Chinchilla Marín |
| author_sort | Carmen Chinchilla Marín |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Act 40/2015 of the legal regime of the Public Sector has introduced a new rule on the calculation of the limitation period to be applied to sanctions in cases where hierarchichal appeal filed against them had been rejected by administrative silence. Thus, within the meaning of section 30.3 of this Act, in case of implied rejection of the appeal, the calculation of the limitation period of the sanction shall begin from the day following the deadline legally established to resolve that appeal. This new rule about the limitation period has logically to have consequences over the enforceability of sanctions, since enforceability of the sanction as such is a prerequisite for the limitation period of it. This article deals with both novelties and analyzes the problem of their contradiction with the case law ¿by the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court¿ regarding the silence within the appeal and its effects (or rather lack of effects) about the limitation period and enforceability of sanctions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e58c9875ae4c4bd2ad4131b4a85af486 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0211-9560 2695-5407 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Vasca de Administración Pública |
| spelling | doaj-art-e58c9875ae4c4bd2ad4131b4a85af4862025-08-20T02:23:36ZspaInstituto Vasco de Administración Pública (IVAP)Revista Vasca de Administración Pública0211-95602695-54072018-04-01110-1Procedimiento Administrativo5795https://doi.org/10.47623/ivap-rvap.110.2018.1.02Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector PúblicoCarmen Chinchilla MarínThe Act 40/2015 of the legal regime of the Public Sector has introduced a new rule on the calculation of the limitation period to be applied to sanctions in cases where hierarchichal appeal filed against them had been rejected by administrative silence. Thus, within the meaning of section 30.3 of this Act, in case of implied rejection of the appeal, the calculation of the limitation period of the sanction shall begin from the day following the deadline legally established to resolve that appeal. This new rule about the limitation period has logically to have consequences over the enforceability of sanctions, since enforceability of the sanction as such is a prerequisite for the limitation period of it. This article deals with both novelties and analyzes the problem of their contradiction with the case law ¿by the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court¿ regarding the silence within the appeal and its effects (or rather lack of effects) about the limitation period and enforceability of sanctions.administrative appealsadministrative sanctionsenforceabilitylimitation periodadministrative silence |
| spellingShingle | Carmen Chinchilla Marín Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público Revista Vasca de Administración Pública administrative appeals administrative sanctions enforceability limitation period administrative silence |
| title | Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público |
| title_full | Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público |
| title_fullStr | Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público |
| title_short | Ejecutividad y prescripción de las sanciones administrativas en las Leyes 39/2015, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas y 40/2015, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público |
| title_sort | ejecutividad y prescripcion de las sanciones administrativas en las leyes 39 2015 del procedimiento administrativo comun de las administraciones publicas y 40 2015 de regimen juridico del sector publico |
| topic | administrative appeals administrative sanctions enforceability limitation period administrative silence |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carmenchinchillamarin ejecutividadyprescripciondelassancionesadministrativasenlasleyes392015delprocedimientoadministrativocomundelasadministracionespublicasy402015deregimenjuridicodelsectorpublico |