Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a new endodontic filling material containing added bioactive glass in comparison to a conventional polydimethylsiloxane-based material. Materials and methods: Fourteen single-rooted teeth were chemomechanically prepared, divided...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maja Namjesnik, Ivan Šalinović, Uzay Koç Vural, Sevil Gurgan, Anja Baraba, Ivana Miletić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine 2025-01-01
Series:Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/480494
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849427940271456256
author Maja Namjesnik
Ivan Šalinović
Uzay Koç Vural
Sevil Gurgan
Anja Baraba
Ivana Miletić
author_facet Maja Namjesnik
Ivan Šalinović
Uzay Koç Vural
Sevil Gurgan
Anja Baraba
Ivana Miletić
author_sort Maja Namjesnik
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a new endodontic filling material containing added bioactive glass in comparison to a conventional polydimethylsiloxane-based material. Materials and methods: Fourteen single-rooted teeth were chemomechanically prepared, divided into two test groups and filled with the test material. The samples were embedded in acrylic resin and sectioned into 1 mm thick slices using a diamond saw. An average of 8 samples was obtained from each tooth GuttaFlow2 n=37, GuttaFlow bioseal n= 34). The force required to fracture each individual sample was measured using the ‘push out’ test method. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test assessed the ‘bonding strength’ distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test compared bonding strength differences between the filling material groups. Results: The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference between the two tested groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: No statistically significant differences in bond strength between tested materials were observed.
format Article
id doaj-art-e537bbd92b2f4f789b9c7c9062b7b800
institution Kabale University
issn 0001-7019
1846-0410
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine
record_format Article
series Acta Stomatologica Croatica
spelling doaj-art-e537bbd92b2f4f789b9c7c9062b7b8002025-08-20T03:28:51ZengUniversity of Zagreb. School of Dental MedicineActa Stomatologica Croatica0001-70191846-04102025-01-0159213314010.15644/asc59/2/3Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling MaterialsMaja Namjesnik0Ivan Šalinović1Uzay Koç Vural2Sevil Gurgan3Anja Baraba4Ivana Miletić5Community Health Center Osijek-Baranja County, Osijek, CroatiaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, CroatiaHacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyHacettepe University, Ankara, TurkeyUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, CroatiaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, CroatiaObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a new endodontic filling material containing added bioactive glass in comparison to a conventional polydimethylsiloxane-based material. Materials and methods: Fourteen single-rooted teeth were chemomechanically prepared, divided into two test groups and filled with the test material. The samples were embedded in acrylic resin and sectioned into 1 mm thick slices using a diamond saw. An average of 8 samples was obtained from each tooth GuttaFlow2 n=37, GuttaFlow bioseal n= 34). The force required to fracture each individual sample was measured using the ‘push out’ test method. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test assessed the ‘bonding strength’ distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test compared bonding strength differences between the filling material groups. Results: The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference between the two tested groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: No statistically significant differences in bond strength between tested materials were observed.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/480494Root Canal Filling MaterialsDentin-Bonding AgentsBond strengthBioactive glassEndodontic filling material
spellingShingle Maja Namjesnik
Ivan Šalinović
Uzay Koç Vural
Sevil Gurgan
Anja Baraba
Ivana Miletić
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Root Canal Filling Materials
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Bond strength
Bioactive glass
Endodontic filling material
title Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
title_full Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
title_short Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials
title_sort evaluation of the bond strength of bioglass based root canal filling materials
topic Root Canal Filling Materials
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Bond strength
Bioactive glass
Endodontic filling material
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/480494
work_keys_str_mv AT majanamjesnik evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials
AT ivansalinovic evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials
AT uzaykocvural evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials
AT sevilgurgan evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials
AT anjabaraba evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials
AT ivanamiletic evaluationofthebondstrengthofbioglassbasedrootcanalfillingmaterials