The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz

Tashkubrîzâdah, in his risalah called “Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz”, examined an issue that was previously discussed between al-Taftazani (d. 792/1390) and Sayyid Sharif (d. 816/1413) whether “wad‘” is in question when the words do not convey a specific meaning and refer direct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah Yıldırım
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Istanbul University Press 2021-10-01
Series:İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/EC6C6CB6668F43209A96863AE28D3DE4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190359841210368
author Abdullah Yıldırım
author_facet Abdullah Yıldırım
author_sort Abdullah Yıldırım
collection DOAJ
description Tashkubrîzâdah, in his risalah called “Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz”, examined an issue that was previously discussed between al-Taftazani (d. 792/1390) and Sayyid Sharif (d. 816/1413) whether “wad‘” is in question when the words do not convey a specific meaning and refer directly to themselves. al-Taftazani defends the idea that all the words that are established to show a certain meaning in language are also established for themselves. However, unlike the phenomenon of wad‘ in the known sense, this does not contain any intention to signify any meaning and takes place in the tacit of the former. Contrary to this view, Sayyid Sharif argues that in cases where the words refer directly to themselves -intentionally or unintentionally- there cannot be any mention of the phenomenon of wad‘. Ali Kuşçu conversely, adopted al-Taftazani’s approach and based this view on some of its results and also made some criticisms of Sayyid Sharif. Contrarily Tashkubrîzâdah, adopted the view put forward by Sayyid Sharif and successfully answered Kuşçu’s criticisms. The author briefly summarizes Sayyid Sharif’s statements and then provides justifications for them. He builds the narrative in this section based on three different types of provision (al-hukm). Subsequently, the author lists his objections to Kuşçu’s explanations in ten points and discusses each objection. Although the discussion of unspoken/implied wad‘ is not one of the main issues of the discipline, it is important in terms of clearly revealing the nature and conceptual content of the phenomenon of wad‘. Furthermore, as Nuzhat al-alhâz constitutes one of the remarkable examples of the risalah tradition in Ottoman intellectual life, it is important to understand it. In interpreting the Nuzhat al-alhâz, this article examines the historical origins of the debate, comperatively analyzes the views of the parties and expatiates on the development of the issue by following the subject.
format Article
id doaj-art-e535900eae4541f9be66c52923223413
institution OA Journals
issn 2717-6967
language Arabic
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-e535900eae4541f9be66c529232234132025-08-20T02:15:19ZaraIstanbul University Pressİslam Tetkikleri Dergisi2717-69672021-10-0111260363810.26650/iuitd.2021.959127123456The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâzAbdullah Yıldırım0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-4662İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, İstanbul, TürkiyeTashkubrîzâdah, in his risalah called “Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz”, examined an issue that was previously discussed between al-Taftazani (d. 792/1390) and Sayyid Sharif (d. 816/1413) whether “wad‘” is in question when the words do not convey a specific meaning and refer directly to themselves. al-Taftazani defends the idea that all the words that are established to show a certain meaning in language are also established for themselves. However, unlike the phenomenon of wad‘ in the known sense, this does not contain any intention to signify any meaning and takes place in the tacit of the former. Contrary to this view, Sayyid Sharif argues that in cases where the words refer directly to themselves -intentionally or unintentionally- there cannot be any mention of the phenomenon of wad‘. Ali Kuşçu conversely, adopted al-Taftazani’s approach and based this view on some of its results and also made some criticisms of Sayyid Sharif. Contrarily Tashkubrîzâdah, adopted the view put forward by Sayyid Sharif and successfully answered Kuşçu’s criticisms. The author briefly summarizes Sayyid Sharif’s statements and then provides justifications for them. He builds the narrative in this section based on three different types of provision (al-hukm). Subsequently, the author lists his objections to Kuşçu’s explanations in ten points and discusses each objection. Although the discussion of unspoken/implied wad‘ is not one of the main issues of the discipline, it is important in terms of clearly revealing the nature and conceptual content of the phenomenon of wad‘. Furthermore, as Nuzhat al-alhâz constitutes one of the remarkable examples of the risalah tradition in Ottoman intellectual life, it is important to understand it. In interpreting the Nuzhat al-alhâz, this article examines the historical origins of the debate, comperatively analyzes the views of the parties and expatiates on the development of the issue by following the subject.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/EC6C6CB6668F43209A96863AE28D3DE4unspoken/implied wad‘al-taftazanisayyid shariftashkubrîzâdah
spellingShingle Abdullah Yıldırım
The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
unspoken/implied wad‘
al-taftazani
sayyid sharif
tashkubrîzâdah
title The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
title_full The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
title_fullStr The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
title_full_unstemmed The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
title_short The Possibility of Unspoken/Implied Vaz‘: Can the Signifier and Signified in Language be the Same Thing? An Evaluation in the Context of Tashkubrîzâdah Ahmed Efendi’s Nuzhat al-alhâz fî adem wad‘ al-alfâz li al-alfâz
title_sort possibility of unspoken implied vaz can the signifier and signified in language be the same thing an evaluation in the context of tashkubrizadah ahmed efendi s nuzhat al alhaz fi adem wad al alfaz li al alfaz
topic unspoken/implied wad‘
al-taftazani
sayyid sharif
tashkubrîzâdah
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/EC6C6CB6668F43209A96863AE28D3DE4
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahyıldırım thepossibilityofunspokenimpliedvazcanthesignifierandsignifiedinlanguagebethesamethinganevaluationinthecontextoftashkubrizadahahmedefendisnuzhatalalhazfiademwadalalfazlialalfaz
AT abdullahyıldırım possibilityofunspokenimpliedvazcanthesignifierandsignifiedinlanguagebethesamethinganevaluationinthecontextoftashkubrizadahahmedefendisnuzhatalalhazfiademwadalalfazlialalfaz