Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests
The goal of the present study to tested and compared a new file system (“Diamond“, Edge Endo, Albuquerque, NM) with a well-known and investigated one (Protaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Baillegues, Switzerland) using three of the most widely used testing methods for NiTi rotary instruments : stiffne...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Publymed
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Annali di Stomatologia |
| Online Access: | https://www.annalidistomatologia.eu/ads/article/view/357/349 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832577706362929152 |
|---|---|
| author | Maya Feghali Biraj Patel Dina Adami James Wealleans Massimo Galli Tugba Turk |
| author_facet | Maya Feghali Biraj Patel Dina Adami James Wealleans Massimo Galli Tugba Turk |
| author_sort | Maya Feghali |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The goal of the present study to tested and compared a new file system (“Diamond“, Edge Endo, Albuquerque, NM) with a well-known and investigated one (Protaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Baillegues, Switzerland) using three of the most widely used testing methods for NiTi rotary instruments : stiffness, torsional and cyclic fatigue tests. For each size and test, ten instruments were analyzed for each of the two brands and then the data were collected. Mean values and the standard deviations of all tests were then statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test with significance set to a 95% confidence level. Results from the present study showed that the new “Diamond” instruments are more flexible than Protaper in size 25 (F2). On the contrary Protaper size 25 is more resistant to torsional stress when measuring torque at failure. All the other sizes show no statistically significant difference it the previously mentioned tests. On the contrary, statistically significant differences can be noted in all sized when evaluation torsional resistance using the deflection angle and cyclic fatigue, with “Diamond” instruments providing the best Results. Therefore, data of the present study suggest the clinical use of the new “Diamond “ instruments for easy, safe and predictable root canal shaping procedures |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e529f5576612461eb8f26b0dbaafc23c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1971-1441 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Publymed |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annali di Stomatologia |
| spelling | doaj-art-e529f5576612461eb8f26b0dbaafc23c2025-01-30T18:19:39ZengPublymedAnnali di Stomatologia1971-14412024-04-0115420320810.59987/ads/2024.4.203-208ads2404-203-208Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro testsMaya Feghali0Biraj Patel1Dina Adami2James Wealleans3Massimo Galli4Tugba Turk5Private practice, Paris, FrancePrivate practice, London, UKPrivate practice, Los Angeles, USAPrivate practice, North South Wales, AustraliaSapienza University of Rome, ItalyUniversity of Izmir, Izmir, TurkeyThe goal of the present study to tested and compared a new file system (“Diamond“, Edge Endo, Albuquerque, NM) with a well-known and investigated one (Protaper Gold, Dentsply Maillefer, Baillegues, Switzerland) using three of the most widely used testing methods for NiTi rotary instruments : stiffness, torsional and cyclic fatigue tests. For each size and test, ten instruments were analyzed for each of the two brands and then the data were collected. Mean values and the standard deviations of all tests were then statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test with significance set to a 95% confidence level. Results from the present study showed that the new “Diamond” instruments are more flexible than Protaper in size 25 (F2). On the contrary Protaper size 25 is more resistant to torsional stress when measuring torque at failure. All the other sizes show no statistically significant difference it the previously mentioned tests. On the contrary, statistically significant differences can be noted in all sized when evaluation torsional resistance using the deflection angle and cyclic fatigue, with “Diamond” instruments providing the best Results. Therefore, data of the present study suggest the clinical use of the new “Diamond “ instruments for easy, safe and predictable root canal shaping procedureshttps://www.annalidistomatologia.eu/ads/article/view/357/349 |
| spellingShingle | Maya Feghali Biraj Patel Dina Adami James Wealleans Massimo Galli Tugba Turk Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests Annali di Stomatologia |
| title | Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| title_full | Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| title_fullStr | Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| title_short | Mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments: a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| title_sort | mechanical properties of new endodontic instruments a comparative approach with different in vitro tests |
| url | https://www.annalidistomatologia.eu/ads/article/view/357/349 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mayafeghali mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests AT birajpatel mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests AT dinaadami mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests AT jameswealleans mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests AT massimogalli mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests AT tugbaturk mechanicalpropertiesofnewendodonticinstrumentsacomparativeapproachwithdifferentinvitrotests |