Embodied decisions as active inference.
Decision-making is often conceptualized as a serial process, during which sensory evidence is accumulated for the choice alternatives until a certain threshold is reached, at which point a decision is made and an action is executed. This decide-then-act perspective has successfully explained various...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013180 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849417400286445568 |
|---|---|
| author | Matteo Priorelli Ivilin Peev Stoianov Giovanni Pezzulo |
| author_facet | Matteo Priorelli Ivilin Peev Stoianov Giovanni Pezzulo |
| author_sort | Matteo Priorelli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Decision-making is often conceptualized as a serial process, during which sensory evidence is accumulated for the choice alternatives until a certain threshold is reached, at which point a decision is made and an action is executed. This decide-then-act perspective has successfully explained various facets of perceptual and economic decisions in the laboratory, in which action dynamics are usually irrelevant to the choice. However, living organisms often face another class of decisions-called embodied decisions-that require selecting between potential courses of actions to be executed timely in a dynamic environment, e.g., for a lion, deciding which gazelle to chase and how fast to do so. Studies of embodied decisions reveal two aspects of goal-directed behavior in stark contrast to the serial view. First, that decision and action processes can unfold in parallel; second, that action-related components, such as the motor costs associated with selecting a particular choice alternative or required to "change mind" between choice alternatives, exert a feedback effect on the decision taken. Here, we show that these signatures of embodied decisions emerge naturally in active inference-a framework that simultaneously optimizes perception and action, according to the same (free energy minimization) imperative. We show that optimizing embodied choices requires a continuous feedback loop between motor planning (where beliefs about choice alternatives guide action dynamics) and motor inference (where action dynamics finesse beliefs about choice alternatives). Furthermore, our active inference simulations reveal the normative character of embodied decisions in ecological settings - namely, achieving an effective balance between a high accuracy and a low risk of missing valid opportunities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e50aedee0f9b422ab476f54ddd257273 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Computational Biology |
| spelling | doaj-art-e50aedee0f9b422ab476f54ddd2572732025-08-20T03:32:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582025-06-01216e101318010.1371/journal.pcbi.1013180Embodied decisions as active inference.Matteo PriorelliIvilin Peev StoianovGiovanni PezzuloDecision-making is often conceptualized as a serial process, during which sensory evidence is accumulated for the choice alternatives until a certain threshold is reached, at which point a decision is made and an action is executed. This decide-then-act perspective has successfully explained various facets of perceptual and economic decisions in the laboratory, in which action dynamics are usually irrelevant to the choice. However, living organisms often face another class of decisions-called embodied decisions-that require selecting between potential courses of actions to be executed timely in a dynamic environment, e.g., for a lion, deciding which gazelle to chase and how fast to do so. Studies of embodied decisions reveal two aspects of goal-directed behavior in stark contrast to the serial view. First, that decision and action processes can unfold in parallel; second, that action-related components, such as the motor costs associated with selecting a particular choice alternative or required to "change mind" between choice alternatives, exert a feedback effect on the decision taken. Here, we show that these signatures of embodied decisions emerge naturally in active inference-a framework that simultaneously optimizes perception and action, according to the same (free energy minimization) imperative. We show that optimizing embodied choices requires a continuous feedback loop between motor planning (where beliefs about choice alternatives guide action dynamics) and motor inference (where action dynamics finesse beliefs about choice alternatives). Furthermore, our active inference simulations reveal the normative character of embodied decisions in ecological settings - namely, achieving an effective balance between a high accuracy and a low risk of missing valid opportunities.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013180 |
| spellingShingle | Matteo Priorelli Ivilin Peev Stoianov Giovanni Pezzulo Embodied decisions as active inference. PLoS Computational Biology |
| title | Embodied decisions as active inference. |
| title_full | Embodied decisions as active inference. |
| title_fullStr | Embodied decisions as active inference. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Embodied decisions as active inference. |
| title_short | Embodied decisions as active inference. |
| title_sort | embodied decisions as active inference |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013180 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matteopriorelli embodieddecisionsasactiveinference AT ivilinpeevstoianov embodieddecisionsasactiveinference AT giovannipezzulo embodieddecisionsasactiveinference |