Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods, indications, outcome of induced labor and its significance in obstetric practice in the study area. Methods. This was a retrospective study of cases of induced labor at the Catholic Maternity Hospital in Ogoja, Cross-River State, Nigeria...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osaheni Lucky Lawani, Azubuike Kanario Onyebuchi, Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke, Chikezie Nwachukwu Okafo, Leonard Ogbonna Ajah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/419621
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849435335464845312
author Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Azubuike Kanario Onyebuchi
Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke
Chikezie Nwachukwu Okafo
Leonard Ogbonna Ajah
author_facet Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Azubuike Kanario Onyebuchi
Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke
Chikezie Nwachukwu Okafo
Leonard Ogbonna Ajah
author_sort Osaheni Lucky Lawani
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods, indications, outcome of induced labor and its significance in obstetric practice in the study area. Methods. This was a retrospective study of cases of induced labor at the Catholic Maternity Hospital in Ogoja, Cross-River State, Nigeria, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2011. Data on the sociodemographic characteristics of the parturient, induction methods, indications for induction, outcomes and reasons for failed induction were abstracted from personal case files and the hospital’s maternity/delivery register. The data were analyzed with SPSS15.0 window version. Result. The induction rate in this study was 11.5%. Induction was successful in 75.9% of cases but failed in 24.1%. Misoprostol was the commonest induction method (78.2%). The commonest indication for induction was postdate pregnancy (45.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, prolonged labor, cephalopelvic disproportion and cord prolapse. The induction-delivery interval was 12±3.6 hours. Conclusion. Induction of labor is a common obstetric procedure which is safe and beneficial in well-selected and properly monitored high risk pregnancies where the benefits of early delivery outweigh the risk of continuing the pregnancy.
format Article
id doaj-art-e501aa0037054ca0a53f2e822ee281d2
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9589
1687-9597
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
spelling doaj-art-e501aa0037054ca0a53f2e822ee281d22025-08-20T03:26:20ZengWileyObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972014-01-01201410.1155/2014/419621419621Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor SettingOsaheni Lucky Lawani0Azubuike Kanario Onyebuchi1Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke2Chikezie Nwachukwu Okafo3Leonard Ogbonna Ajah4Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Catholic Maternity Hospital, PMB 104, Moniaya, Ogoja, Cross-Rivers State, NigeriaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Federal Teaching Hospital, PMB 102, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, NigeriaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, PMB 01129, Enugu State, Enugu 400001, NigeriaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, PMB 007, Lafia, Nasarawa State, NigeriaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, PMB 01129, Enugu State, Enugu 400001, NigeriaObjectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods, indications, outcome of induced labor and its significance in obstetric practice in the study area. Methods. This was a retrospective study of cases of induced labor at the Catholic Maternity Hospital in Ogoja, Cross-River State, Nigeria, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2011. Data on the sociodemographic characteristics of the parturient, induction methods, indications for induction, outcomes and reasons for failed induction were abstracted from personal case files and the hospital’s maternity/delivery register. The data were analyzed with SPSS15.0 window version. Result. The induction rate in this study was 11.5%. Induction was successful in 75.9% of cases but failed in 24.1%. Misoprostol was the commonest induction method (78.2%). The commonest indication for induction was postdate pregnancy (45.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, prolonged labor, cephalopelvic disproportion and cord prolapse. The induction-delivery interval was 12±3.6 hours. Conclusion. Induction of labor is a common obstetric procedure which is safe and beneficial in well-selected and properly monitored high risk pregnancies where the benefits of early delivery outweigh the risk of continuing the pregnancy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/419621
spellingShingle Osaheni Lucky Lawani
Azubuike Kanario Onyebuchi
Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke
Chikezie Nwachukwu Okafo
Leonard Ogbonna Ajah
Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
title Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
title_full Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
title_fullStr Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
title_short Obstetric Outcome and Significance of Labour Induction in a Health Resource Poor Setting
title_sort obstetric outcome and significance of labour induction in a health resource poor setting
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/419621
work_keys_str_mv AT osaheniluckylawani obstetricoutcomeandsignificanceoflabourinductioninahealthresourcepoorsetting
AT azubuikekanarioonyebuchi obstetricoutcomeandsignificanceoflabourinductioninahealthresourcepoorsetting
AT chukwuemekaanthonyiyoke obstetricoutcomeandsignificanceoflabourinductioninahealthresourcepoorsetting
AT chikezienwachukwuokafo obstetricoutcomeandsignificanceoflabourinductioninahealthresourcepoorsetting
AT leonardogbonnaajah obstetricoutcomeandsignificanceoflabourinductioninahealthresourcepoorsetting