Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil

The aim to solve the methodological problem of assessing variability of soil organic carbon content (Corg) in layer 0–20 cm based on 10-fold independent mixed sampling from the same field during one day. The soil sampling was carried out on 4 fields ranging from 6 to 16 hectares (Tver region). The s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. B. Khitrov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute 2025-04-01
Series:Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bulletin.esoil.ru/jour/article/view/835
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849244185241059328
author N. B. Khitrov
author_facet N. B. Khitrov
author_sort N. B. Khitrov
collection DOAJ
description The aim to solve the methodological problem of assessing variability of soil organic carbon content (Corg) in layer 0–20 cm based on 10-fold independent mixed sampling from the same field during one day. The soil sampling was carried out on 4 fields ranging from 6 to 16 hectares (Tver region). The soil cover pattern is represented by patches of agrosod-podzolic gleyic sandy loam and loam soils (Albic Retisols (Aric, Loamic)) developed from binary deposits and agrosod-podzols (Albic Podzols (Aric, Arenic)) developed from sands underlying loamy moraine from the depth 80–150 cm. It has been established that the variation in Corg content in mixed samples reflects the spatial component that is sometimes comparable to, but more often significantly higher than analytical reproducibility of laboratory methods for determination Corg (Turin method and dry combustion method). To compare single measurements of Corg in mixed samples obtained at different time periods or from different fields, the use of even the full confidence range based on the interlaboratory reproducibility of the determination method turns out to be an unreasonably low estimate. To conduct monitoring of Corg content, it is necessary to assess the spatial variation of the indicator, even when selecting mixed samples.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4feb1447bd5417c8a42d858e2576e2a
institution Kabale University
issn 0136-1694
2312-4202
language Russian
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute
record_format Article
series Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева
spelling doaj-art-e4feb1447bd5417c8a42d858e2576e2a2025-08-20T03:59:13ZrusV.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science InstituteБюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева0136-16942312-42022025-04-01012252010.19047/0136-1694-2025-122-5-20670Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soilN. B. Khitrov0Federal Research Centre “V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute”The aim to solve the methodological problem of assessing variability of soil organic carbon content (Corg) in layer 0–20 cm based on 10-fold independent mixed sampling from the same field during one day. The soil sampling was carried out on 4 fields ranging from 6 to 16 hectares (Tver region). The soil cover pattern is represented by patches of agrosod-podzolic gleyic sandy loam and loam soils (Albic Retisols (Aric, Loamic)) developed from binary deposits and agrosod-podzols (Albic Podzols (Aric, Arenic)) developed from sands underlying loamy moraine from the depth 80–150 cm. It has been established that the variation in Corg content in mixed samples reflects the spatial component that is sometimes comparable to, but more often significantly higher than analytical reproducibility of laboratory methods for determination Corg (Turin method and dry combustion method). To compare single measurements of Corg in mixed samples obtained at different time periods or from different fields, the use of even the full confidence range based on the interlaboratory reproducibility of the determination method turns out to be an unreasonably low estimate. To conduct monitoring of Corg content, it is necessary to assess the spatial variation of the indicator, even when selecting mixed samples.https://bulletin.esoil.ru/jour/article/view/835spatial variabilityanalytical reproducibilityturin methoddry combustion methodmonitoring of soil organic carbon
spellingShingle N. B. Khitrov
Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева
spatial variability
analytical reproducibility
turin method
dry combustion method
monitoring of soil organic carbon
title Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
title_full Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
title_fullStr Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
title_full_unstemmed Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
title_short Representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
title_sort representativeness of mixed samples for evaluation of organic carbon in soil
topic spatial variability
analytical reproducibility
turin method
dry combustion method
monitoring of soil organic carbon
url https://bulletin.esoil.ru/jour/article/view/835
work_keys_str_mv AT nbkhitrov representativenessofmixedsamplesforevaluationoforganiccarboninsoil