Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing minimally invasive pneumonectomy at high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers have improved survival compared with patients who undergo open pneumonectomy. Methods: Patients from the National Cancer Database who underwent pneumonec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Winston L. Trope, BE, Ntemena Kapula, MS, Irmina A. Elliott, MD, Brandon A. Guenthart, MD, Natalie S. Lui, MD, Leah M. Backhus, MD, Mark F. Berry, MD, Joseph B. Shrager, MD, Douglas Z. Liou, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:JTCVS Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000543
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849710106066812928
author Winston L. Trope, BE
Ntemena Kapula, MS
Irmina A. Elliott, MD
Brandon A. Guenthart, MD
Natalie S. Lui, MD
Leah M. Backhus, MD
Mark F. Berry, MD
Joseph B. Shrager, MD
Douglas Z. Liou, MD
author_facet Winston L. Trope, BE
Ntemena Kapula, MS
Irmina A. Elliott, MD
Brandon A. Guenthart, MD
Natalie S. Lui, MD
Leah M. Backhus, MD
Mark F. Berry, MD
Joseph B. Shrager, MD
Douglas Z. Liou, MD
author_sort Winston L. Trope, BE
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing minimally invasive pneumonectomy at high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers have improved survival compared with patients who undergo open pneumonectomy. Methods: Patients from the National Cancer Database who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2010 and 2020 were stratified into 3 groups according to surgical technique (open, minimally invasive, converted from minimally invasive to open). Institutions were categorized as low-, mid-, or high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers according to percentage of total anatomic lung resections performed by video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and propensity score matching. Results: In total, 5750 patients from 850 facilities were included, with 4597 (79.9%) undergoing upfront open pneumonectomy. Among the 1153 attempted minimally invasive pneumonectomies, 364 (31.6%) required conversion to open pneumonectomy. Surgery at a non−high-volume center was associated with greater conversion risk (adjusted odds ratio, 4.16; P < .001), whereas neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; P = .015). Similar 5-year overall survival was seen among the 3 groups (open 45.2%, minimally invasive 48.3%, converted 43.3%); however, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.16; P = .058). Conclusions: Minimally invasive pneumonectomy for lung cancer had similar 5-year survival compared with open pneumonectomy. However, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy showed a trend toward increased risk of death, and conversion rates were high irrespective of institutional minimally invasive lung surgery volume. Careful patient selection is necessary when considering minimally invasive pneumonectomy so that long-term outcomes are not compromised.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4e4c71cd38445d1843c6272e1059d69
institution DOAJ
issn 2666-2736
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JTCVS Open
spelling doaj-art-e4e4c71cd38445d1843c6272e1059d692025-08-20T03:15:03ZengElsevierJTCVS Open2666-27362025-04-012442343710.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.006Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspectiveWinston L. Trope, BE0Ntemena Kapula, MS1Irmina A. Elliott, MD2Brandon A. Guenthart, MD3Natalie S. Lui, MD4Leah M. Backhus, MD5Mark F. Berry, MD6Joseph B. Shrager, MD7Douglas Z. Liou, MD8Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, ConnDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CalifDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif; Address for reprints: Douglas Z. Liou, MD, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Falk Cardiovascular Research Institute, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.Objective: To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing minimally invasive pneumonectomy at high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers have improved survival compared with patients who undergo open pneumonectomy. Methods: Patients from the National Cancer Database who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2010 and 2020 were stratified into 3 groups according to surgical technique (open, minimally invasive, converted from minimally invasive to open). Institutions were categorized as low-, mid-, or high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers according to percentage of total anatomic lung resections performed by video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and propensity score matching. Results: In total, 5750 patients from 850 facilities were included, with 4597 (79.9%) undergoing upfront open pneumonectomy. Among the 1153 attempted minimally invasive pneumonectomies, 364 (31.6%) required conversion to open pneumonectomy. Surgery at a non−high-volume center was associated with greater conversion risk (adjusted odds ratio, 4.16; P < .001), whereas neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; P = .015). Similar 5-year overall survival was seen among the 3 groups (open 45.2%, minimally invasive 48.3%, converted 43.3%); however, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.16; P = .058). Conclusions: Minimally invasive pneumonectomy for lung cancer had similar 5-year survival compared with open pneumonectomy. However, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy showed a trend toward increased risk of death, and conversion rates were high irrespective of institutional minimally invasive lung surgery volume. Careful patient selection is necessary when considering minimally invasive pneumonectomy so that long-term outcomes are not compromised.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000543pneumonectomysurgeryoperative planningsurgical volumeneoadjuvant therapy
spellingShingle Winston L. Trope, BE
Ntemena Kapula, MS
Irmina A. Elliott, MD
Brandon A. Guenthart, MD
Natalie S. Lui, MD
Leah M. Backhus, MD
Mark F. Berry, MD
Joseph B. Shrager, MD
Douglas Z. Liou, MD
Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
JTCVS Open
pneumonectomy
surgery
operative planning
surgical volume
neoadjuvant therapy
title Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
title_full Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
title_fullStr Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
title_full_unstemmed Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
title_short Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomyCentral MessagePerspective
title_sort factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomycentral messageperspective
topic pneumonectomy
surgery
operative planning
surgical volume
neoadjuvant therapy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000543
work_keys_str_mv AT winstonltropebe factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT ntemenakapulams factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT irminaaelliottmd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT brandonaguenthartmd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT nataliesluimd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT leahmbackhusmd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT markfberrymd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT josephbshragermd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective
AT douglaszlioumd factorsandoutcomesassociatedwithsuccessfulminimallyinvasivepneumonectomycentralmessageperspective