Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket

Abstract Background Proper torque control is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to employ finite element analysis to compare the torque capabilities of a novel spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system against those of commonly used passive self-ligating...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yudong Liu, Longmei Guo, Yanqing Feng, Jiahao Hua, Qingyuan Dai, Ziyang Chen, Wenlu Song, Bing Guo, Taicong Chen, Li Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05423-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544249506529280
author Yudong Liu
Longmei Guo
Yanqing Feng
Jiahao Hua
Qingyuan Dai
Ziyang Chen
Wenlu Song
Bing Guo
Taicong Chen
Li Ji
author_facet Yudong Liu
Longmei Guo
Yanqing Feng
Jiahao Hua
Qingyuan Dai
Ziyang Chen
Wenlu Song
Bing Guo
Taicong Chen
Li Ji
author_sort Yudong Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Proper torque control is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to employ finite element analysis to compare the torque capabilities of a novel spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system against those of commonly used passive self-ligating and conventional bracket systems, as well as to reveal the biomechanical changes in the periodontal ligament (PDL) during torque expression. Methods A maxillary right central incisor, along with its PDL and alveolar bone, were modeled. Three types of brackets were selected: a spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system, a passive self-ligating bracket (Damon), and a conventional bracket (Discovery). Each bracket was equipped with a 0.022-inch slot and a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire. A palatal root torque of 20° was applied. The torque moment, as well as the von Mises stress and strain in the PDL, were calculated. A clinical case involving the lingual inclination of the upper anterior teeth was utilized to assess the feasibility of using the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system to express torque. Results At a twist angle of 20°, the maximum torque generated by the spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system (27.8 N·mm) was approximately 1.6 times greater than that of the Damon bracket (17.5 N·mm) and the Discovery bracket (17.3 N·mm). As the twist angle increased, both the von Mises stress and the strain in the PDL also increased. When the maximum PDL stress was less than 0.026 MPa and the percentage of the PDL good strain area (defined as the area with PDL strain ≥ 0.3%) exceeded 50%, the torque range for the maxillary incisor was between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm. The clinical case demonstrated that the use of the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system effectively corrected the unfavorable linguoclination of the maxillary incisors. Conclusions The spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system can significantly enhance torque expression. The optimal torque range for the maxillary incisor is between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4d740228f0b47cd87a47dbd6b8102df
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6831
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj-art-e4d740228f0b47cd87a47dbd6b8102df2025-01-12T12:42:06ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-01-0125111210.1186/s12903-025-05423-6Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracketYudong Liu0Longmei Guo1Yanqing Feng2Jiahao Hua3Qingyuan Dai4Ziyang Chen5Wenlu Song6Bing Guo7Taicong Chen8Li Ji9Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversitySchool of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of TechnologySchool of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of TechnologyGuangzhou OO Stomatology InstituteGuangzhou OO Stomatology InstituteDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversitySchool of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of TechnologyDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityAbstract Background Proper torque control is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to employ finite element analysis to compare the torque capabilities of a novel spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system against those of commonly used passive self-ligating and conventional bracket systems, as well as to reveal the biomechanical changes in the periodontal ligament (PDL) during torque expression. Methods A maxillary right central incisor, along with its PDL and alveolar bone, were modeled. Three types of brackets were selected: a spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system, a passive self-ligating bracket (Damon), and a conventional bracket (Discovery). Each bracket was equipped with a 0.022-inch slot and a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire. A palatal root torque of 20° was applied. The torque moment, as well as the von Mises stress and strain in the PDL, were calculated. A clinical case involving the lingual inclination of the upper anterior teeth was utilized to assess the feasibility of using the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system to express torque. Results At a twist angle of 20°, the maximum torque generated by the spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system (27.8 N·mm) was approximately 1.6 times greater than that of the Damon bracket (17.5 N·mm) and the Discovery bracket (17.3 N·mm). As the twist angle increased, both the von Mises stress and the strain in the PDL also increased. When the maximum PDL stress was less than 0.026 MPa and the percentage of the PDL good strain area (defined as the area with PDL strain ≥ 0.3%) exceeded 50%, the torque range for the maxillary incisor was between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm. The clinical case demonstrated that the use of the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system effectively corrected the unfavorable linguoclination of the maxillary incisors. Conclusions The spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system can significantly enhance torque expression. The optimal torque range for the maxillary incisor is between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05423-6Torque expressionSpherical self-ligating bracketLock-hook systemBiomechanicsFinite element analysis
spellingShingle Yudong Liu
Longmei Guo
Yanqing Feng
Jiahao Hua
Qingyuan Dai
Ziyang Chen
Wenlu Song
Bing Guo
Taicong Chen
Li Ji
Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
BMC Oral Health
Torque expression
Spherical self-ligating bracket
Lock-hook system
Biomechanics
Finite element analysis
title Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
title_full Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
title_fullStr Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
title_short Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket
title_sort comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects spherical self ligating bracket with lock hook system versus passive self ligating bracket and conventional bracket
topic Torque expression
Spherical self-ligating bracket
Lock-hook system
Biomechanics
Finite element analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05423-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yudongliu comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT longmeiguo comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT yanqingfeng comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT jiahaohua comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT qingyuandai comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT ziyangchen comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT wenlusong comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT bingguo comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT taicongchen comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket
AT liji comparativestudyoftorqueexpressionanditsbiomechanicaleffectssphericalselfligatingbracketwithlockhooksystemversuspassiveselfligatingbracketandconventionalbracket