Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa
This article analyzes the controversy between the Uruguayan critics Carlos Real de Azúa and Alberto Zum Felde around “literary history”. The dispute initiated in the weekly publication Marcha in 1955 problematizes the notions of history as a concept, field of research and writing. It anticipates a t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Réseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la Plata
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Cuadernos LIRICO |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/12205 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846091207557513216 |
|---|---|
| author | Ignacio Bajter |
| author_facet | Ignacio Bajter |
| author_sort | Ignacio Bajter |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article analyzes the controversy between the Uruguayan critics Carlos Real de Azúa and Alberto Zum Felde around “literary history”. The dispute initiated in the weekly publication Marcha in 1955 problematizes the notions of history as a concept, field of research and writing. It anticipates a theoretical crisis and eventually divides the historiography of Uruguayan literature. Real de Azúa’s groundbreaking argument, the object of this article, suggests the impossibility of a history of literature and instead proposes an approach to “temporal texture”. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e4d5737d2d154cc788edd3531fe1f9ab |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2262-8339 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Réseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la Plata |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cuadernos LIRICO |
| spelling | doaj-art-e4d5737d2d154cc788edd3531fe1f9ab2025-01-10T13:08:11ZspaRéseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la PlataCuadernos LIRICO2262-83392022-06-012410.4000/lirico.12205Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de AzúaIgnacio BajterThis article analyzes the controversy between the Uruguayan critics Carlos Real de Azúa and Alberto Zum Felde around “literary history”. The dispute initiated in the weekly publication Marcha in 1955 problematizes the notions of history as a concept, field of research and writing. It anticipates a theoretical crisis and eventually divides the historiography of Uruguayan literature. Real de Azúa’s groundbreaking argument, the object of this article, suggests the impossibility of a history of literature and instead proposes an approach to “temporal texture”.https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/12205History of literatureUruguayan literatureimpossibility of history |
| spellingShingle | Ignacio Bajter Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa Cuadernos LIRICO History of literature Uruguayan literature impossibility of history |
| title | Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa |
| title_full | Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa |
| title_fullStr | Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa |
| title_short | Crítica después de la historia: Zum Felde, Real de Azúa |
| title_sort | critica despues de la historia zum felde real de azua |
| topic | History of literature Uruguayan literature impossibility of history |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/12205 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ignaciobajter criticadespuesdelahistoriazumfelderealdeazua |