Can biosampling really be “non-invasive”? An examination of the socially invasive nature of physically non-invasive biosampling in urban and rural Malawi

Glucocorticoids are understood to represent useful biomarkers of stress and can be measured in saliva, hair, and breastmilk. The collection of such biosamples is increasingly included in biobank and cohort studies. While collection is considered “non-invasive” by biomedical researchers (compared to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Myness Kasanda Ndambo, Christopher Bunn, Martyn Pickersgill, Robert C. Stewart, Amelia C. Crampin, Maisha Nyasulu, Beatson Kanyenda, Wisdom Mnthali, Eric Umar, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Lucinda Manda-Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Global Bioethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11287462.2024.2398303
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Glucocorticoids are understood to represent useful biomarkers of stress and can be measured in saliva, hair, and breastmilk. The collection of such biosamples is increasingly included in biobank and cohort studies. While collection is considered “non-invasive” by biomedical researchers (compared to sampling blood), community perspectives may differ. This cross-sectional, qualitative study utilising eight focus groups aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of collecting ostensibly “non-invasive” biological samples in Malawi. Breastfeeding women, couples, field workers, and healthcare providers were purposively sampled. Data about prior understandings of, barriers to, and feasibility of “non-invasive” biosampling were analysed. Participants described biomaterials intended for “non-invasive” collection as sometimes highly sensitive, with sampling procedures raising community concerns. Sampling methods framed as physically “non-invasive” within biomedicine can consequently be considered socially “invasive” by prospective sample donors. Biomedical and community framings of “invasiveness’ can therefore diverge, and the former must respond to and be informed by the perspectives of the latter. Further, considerations of collection procedures are shaped by therapeutic misconceptions about the immediate health-related utility of biomedical and public health research. When researchers engage with communities about biosampling, they must ensure they are not furthering therapeutic misconceptions and actively seek to dispel these.
ISSN:1128-7462
1591-7398