Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review

Purpose This umbrella review aimed to review and synthesise the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses analysing the effects of cupping therapy programs on musculoskeletal pain in athletes and the general population. Methods A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie, Amr M. Yehia, Mahmoud Hamada Mohamed, Manna Mahmoud, Mohamed N. AlKholui, Ghada I. Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2024-12-01
Series:Human Movement
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hummov.awf.wroc.pl/Effectiveness-of-cupping-therapy-for-musculoskeletal-pain-an-umbrella-review,194774,0,2.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584759307403264
author Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie
Amr M. Yehia
Mahmoud Hamada Mohamed
Manna Mahmoud
Mohamed N. AlKholui
Ghada I. Mohamed
author_facet Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie
Amr M. Yehia
Mahmoud Hamada Mohamed
Manna Mahmoud
Mohamed N. AlKholui
Ghada I. Mohamed
author_sort Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie
collection DOAJ
description Purpose This umbrella review aimed to review and synthesise the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses analysing the effects of cupping therapy programs on musculoskeletal pain in athletes and the general population. Methods A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro was performed. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was evaluated using the 16 domains of the AMSTAR2 checklist. Based on the performance in these 16 domains of different weights, an overall rating was generated, and the quality was determined to be critically low (1–4), low (5–8), moderate (9–12), or high (13–16). The overall confidence in the results of the reviews was low. Among the critical items, all reviews failed to present a list of excluded trials, four reviews did not consider the risk of bias when presenting or discussing their results, three reviews did not use adequate methods for the meta-analysis, the impact of publication bias was not investigated in three reviews, and the absence of a planned protocol to guide the review was noted in two reviews. Most reviews included trials of low quality (i.e., high risk of bias). Results A total of 301 studies involving 27,960 participants were analysed in 21 systematic reviews. The review confirmed that cupping therapy is more effective than passive interventions such as heat therapy, usual care, conventional medications, and no treatment. However, its effectiveness is similar to acupuncture. There is not enough evidence to recommend cupping therapy for athletes, and there are associated risks such as hematoma, pain at the application site, increased pain, tingling sensations, and dizziness. Conclusions Considering the standards, this umbrella review showed that most systematic reviews and meta-analyses using cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain present low methodological quality. Most of the systematic reviews in this umbrella revealed that cupping therapy is ineffective in improving musculoskeletal pain in the athletic and general populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4a78bff056c4b18abc868c9e8e0ff4b
institution Kabale University
issn 1899-1955
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Human Movement
spelling doaj-art-e4a78bff056c4b18abc868c9e8e0ff4b2025-01-27T11:40:26ZengTermedia Publishing HouseHuman Movement1899-19552024-12-01254284310.5114/hm/194774194774Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella reviewMohamed Magdy ElMeligie0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-5252Amr M. Yehia1Mahmoud Hamada Mohamed2Manna Mahmoud3Mohamed N. AlKholui4Ghada I. Mohamed5Department of Physical Therapy for Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, EgyptDepartment of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders and Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, 6th October University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Physical Therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy Ahram Canadian University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, EgyptDepartment of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamsa, EgyptDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, EgyptPurpose This umbrella review aimed to review and synthesise the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses analysing the effects of cupping therapy programs on musculoskeletal pain in athletes and the general population. Methods A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro was performed. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was evaluated using the 16 domains of the AMSTAR2 checklist. Based on the performance in these 16 domains of different weights, an overall rating was generated, and the quality was determined to be critically low (1–4), low (5–8), moderate (9–12), or high (13–16). The overall confidence in the results of the reviews was low. Among the critical items, all reviews failed to present a list of excluded trials, four reviews did not consider the risk of bias when presenting or discussing their results, three reviews did not use adequate methods for the meta-analysis, the impact of publication bias was not investigated in three reviews, and the absence of a planned protocol to guide the review was noted in two reviews. Most reviews included trials of low quality (i.e., high risk of bias). Results A total of 301 studies involving 27,960 participants were analysed in 21 systematic reviews. The review confirmed that cupping therapy is more effective than passive interventions such as heat therapy, usual care, conventional medications, and no treatment. However, its effectiveness is similar to acupuncture. There is not enough evidence to recommend cupping therapy for athletes, and there are associated risks such as hematoma, pain at the application site, increased pain, tingling sensations, and dizziness. Conclusions Considering the standards, this umbrella review showed that most systematic reviews and meta-analyses using cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain present low methodological quality. Most of the systematic reviews in this umbrella revealed that cupping therapy is ineffective in improving musculoskeletal pain in the athletic and general populations.https://hummov.awf.wroc.pl/Effectiveness-of-cupping-therapy-for-musculoskeletal-pain-an-umbrella-review,194774,0,2.htmlathletescupping therapypainmusculoskeletal injurygeneral population
spellingShingle Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie
Amr M. Yehia
Mahmoud Hamada Mohamed
Manna Mahmoud
Mohamed N. AlKholui
Ghada I. Mohamed
Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
Human Movement
athletes
cupping therapy
pain
musculoskeletal injury
general population
title Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
title_full Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
title_short Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
title_sort effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain an umbrella review
topic athletes
cupping therapy
pain
musculoskeletal injury
general population
url https://hummov.awf.wroc.pl/Effectiveness-of-cupping-therapy-for-musculoskeletal-pain-an-umbrella-review,194774,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmagdyelmeligie effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview
AT amrmyehia effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview
AT mahmoudhamadamohamed effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview
AT mannamahmoud effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview
AT mohamednalkholui effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview
AT ghadaimohamed effectivenessofcuppingtherapyformusculoskeletalpainanumbrellareview