A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally

Abstract Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) is often used in cancer studies to assess patient reported quality of life over time. A number of challenges are faced when analysing scores derived from this questionna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosie A. Harris, Chris A. Rogers, Jessica Harris, Eric Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02622-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234498873458688
author Rosie A. Harris
Chris A. Rogers
Jessica Harris
Eric Lim
author_facet Rosie A. Harris
Chris A. Rogers
Jessica Harris
Eric Lim
author_sort Rosie A. Harris
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) is often used in cancer studies to assess patient reported quality of life over time. A number of challenges are faced when analysing scores derived from this questionnaire, and a multitude of statistical methods can be used. Whilst methods exist to overcome issues such as non-independence of repeated measurements and informative dropout, it is unclear how often these are implemented in practice. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively describe the statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal quality of life scores derived from the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Methods Two databases, MEDLINE and Embase, were searched for randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies presenting statistical analyses of QLQ-C30 scores collected over time. Only studies published in English between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 were included. Studies not reporting the statistical methods used were excluded. A REDCap database was developed to store extracted information and results are presented as descriptive summaries. Results Two-hundred and seventy-one eligible studies were identified including 161 parallel group randomised controlled trials and 84 cohort studies. A linear mixed effects model was the most utilized analysis method, applied in 121/271 (45%) studies, followed by time to event analyses (54/271, 20%) and t-tests (44/271, 16%). Nearly one third of studies did not apply any longitudinal analysis method (82/271, 30%). Missing data due to death was accounted for in 23/271 (8%) studies. Statistical approaches did not differ greatly depending on the design of the study. Conclusions There is no current consensus on the statistical method to analyse repeated QLQ-C30 scores. Many studies continue to ignore the longitudinal structure of repeated measures data, which could impact the interpretation of the data and conclusions drawn.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4a4306da7a5447e8f56648d8fd52cb0
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2288
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj-art-e4a4306da7a5447e8f56648d8fd52cb02025-08-20T04:03:07ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882025-08-0125111510.1186/s12874-025-02622-1A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinallyRosie A. Harris0Chris A. Rogers1Jessica Harris2Eric Lim3Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolBristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolRoyal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) is often used in cancer studies to assess patient reported quality of life over time. A number of challenges are faced when analysing scores derived from this questionnaire, and a multitude of statistical methods can be used. Whilst methods exist to overcome issues such as non-independence of repeated measurements and informative dropout, it is unclear how often these are implemented in practice. The aim of this scoping review was to comprehensively describe the statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal quality of life scores derived from the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Methods Two databases, MEDLINE and Embase, were searched for randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies presenting statistical analyses of QLQ-C30 scores collected over time. Only studies published in English between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 were included. Studies not reporting the statistical methods used were excluded. A REDCap database was developed to store extracted information and results are presented as descriptive summaries. Results Two-hundred and seventy-one eligible studies were identified including 161 parallel group randomised controlled trials and 84 cohort studies. A linear mixed effects model was the most utilized analysis method, applied in 121/271 (45%) studies, followed by time to event analyses (54/271, 20%) and t-tests (44/271, 16%). Nearly one third of studies did not apply any longitudinal analysis method (82/271, 30%). Missing data due to death was accounted for in 23/271 (8%) studies. Statistical approaches did not differ greatly depending on the design of the study. Conclusions There is no current consensus on the statistical method to analyse repeated QLQ-C30 scores. Many studies continue to ignore the longitudinal structure of repeated measures data, which could impact the interpretation of the data and conclusions drawn.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02622-1Statistical methodologyStatistical analysisEORTC QLQ-C30Quality of lifeLongitudinalReview
spellingShingle Rosie A. Harris
Chris A. Rogers
Jessica Harris
Eric Lim
A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical methodology
Statistical analysis
EORTC QLQ-C30
Quality of life
Longitudinal
Review
title A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
title_full A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
title_fullStr A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
title_short A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
title_sort scoping review of statistical methods used to report eortc qlq c30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally
topic Statistical methodology
Statistical analysis
EORTC QLQ-C30
Quality of life
Longitudinal
Review
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02622-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rosieaharris ascopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT chrisarogers ascopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT jessicaharris ascopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT ericlim ascopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT rosieaharris scopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT chrisarogers scopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT jessicaharris scopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally
AT ericlim scopingreviewofstatisticalmethodsusedtoreporteortcqlqc30qualityoflifescoresmeasuredlongitudinally