Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls
Polls posted on social media can provide information about public opinion on a variety of issues from business decisions to support for presidential election candidates. However, it is largely unknown whether the information provided by social polls is useful or not. To enhance our understanding of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
HOPE
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journalqd.org/article/view/5897 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849404269251264512 |
|---|---|
| author | Stephen Scarano Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan Mattia Samory JungHwan Yang Przemyslaw Grabowicz |
| author_facet | Stephen Scarano Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan Mattia Samory JungHwan Yang Przemyslaw Grabowicz |
| author_sort | Stephen Scarano |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Polls posted on social media can provide information about public opinion on a variety of issues from business decisions to support for presidential election candidates. However, it is largely unknown whether the information provided by social polls is useful or not. To enhance our understanding of social polls, we examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns.
First, we describe the prevalence of social polls. Second, we characterize social polls in terms of the engagement they elicit and the response options they present. Third, leveraging machine learning models, we infer and describe several characteristics, including demographics and political leanings, of the users who author and interact with social polls. Finally, we study the relationship between social poll results, their attributes, and the characteristics of users interacting with them. Our findings suggest how and to what extent polling on Twitter is biased in terms of content, authorship, and audience. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump, whereas traditional surveys favored Democratic candidates. We further identify and explore the potential reasons for such biases and discuss their repercussions.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e49aa29dd07c4062a397898d05a06bcf |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2673-8813 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | HOPE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media |
| spelling | doaj-art-e49aa29dd07c4062a397898d05a06bcf2025-08-20T03:37:02ZengHOPEJournal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media2673-88132024-05-01410.51685/jqd.2024.icwsm.4Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter PollsStephen Scarano0Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan1Mattia Samory2JungHwan Yang3Przemyslaw Grabowicz 4University of Massachusetts, AmherstUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University of Massachusetts, Amherst Polls posted on social media can provide information about public opinion on a variety of issues from business decisions to support for presidential election candidates. However, it is largely unknown whether the information provided by social polls is useful or not. To enhance our understanding of social polls, we examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. First, we describe the prevalence of social polls. Second, we characterize social polls in terms of the engagement they elicit and the response options they present. Third, leveraging machine learning models, we infer and describe several characteristics, including demographics and political leanings, of the users who author and interact with social polls. Finally, we study the relationship between social poll results, their attributes, and the characteristics of users interacting with them. Our findings suggest how and to what extent polling on Twitter is biased in terms of content, authorship, and audience. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump, whereas traditional surveys favored Democratic candidates. We further identify and explore the potential reasons for such biases and discuss their repercussions. https://journalqd.org/article/view/5897public opinionsocial mediaopinion polls |
| spellingShingle | Stephen Scarano Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan Mattia Samory JungHwan Yang Przemyslaw Grabowicz Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media public opinion social media opinion polls |
| title | Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls |
| title_full | Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls |
| title_fullStr | Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls |
| title_short | Analyzing Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls |
| title_sort | analyzing support for u s presidential candidates in twitter polls |
| topic | public opinion social media opinion polls |
| url | https://journalqd.org/article/view/5897 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephenscarano analyzingsupportforuspresidentialcandidatesintwitterpolls AT vijayalakshmivasudevan analyzingsupportforuspresidentialcandidatesintwitterpolls AT mattiasamory analyzingsupportforuspresidentialcandidatesintwitterpolls AT junghwanyang analyzingsupportforuspresidentialcandidatesintwitterpolls AT przemyslawgrabowicz analyzingsupportforuspresidentialcandidatesintwitterpolls |