The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy

<b>Background</b>: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an advanced preclinical approach in radiotherapy that utilizes spatially fractionated dose distributions by collimating x-rays into micrometer-wide, planar beams. While the benefits of temporal fractionation are well established and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Stolz, Kristina Rogal, Sandra Bicher, Johanna Winter, Mabroor Ahmed, Susanne Raulefs, Stephanie E. Combs, Stefan H. Bartzsch, Thomas E. Schmid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/678
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850204655529754624
author Jessica Stolz
Kristina Rogal
Sandra Bicher
Johanna Winter
Mabroor Ahmed
Susanne Raulefs
Stephanie E. Combs
Stefan H. Bartzsch
Thomas E. Schmid
author_facet Jessica Stolz
Kristina Rogal
Sandra Bicher
Johanna Winter
Mabroor Ahmed
Susanne Raulefs
Stephanie E. Combs
Stefan H. Bartzsch
Thomas E. Schmid
author_sort Jessica Stolz
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an advanced preclinical approach in radiotherapy that utilizes spatially fractionated dose distributions by collimating x-rays into micrometer-wide, planar beams. While the benefits of temporal fractionation are well established and widely incorporated into conventional radiotherapy protocols, the interplay between MRT and temporal dose fractionation remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate the effects of combining temporal and spatial dose fractionation by assessing clonogenic cell survival following temporally fractionated MRT with varying irradiation angles, compared to conventional broad-beam (BB) irradiation. <b>Methods</b>: A lung tumor cell line (A549) and a normal lung cell line (MRC-5) were irradiated with a total number of four fractions with a 24 h interval between each fraction. We compared a temporally fractionated BB regime to two temporally fractionated MRT schemes with either overlapping MRT fields or MRT fields with a 45° rotation per fraction. Subsequently, the clonogenic cell survival assay was used by analyzing the corresponding survival fractions (SFs). <b>Results</b>: The clonogenic survival of A549 tumor cells differed significantly between microbeam radiation therapy with rotation (MRT + R) and overlapping MRT. However, neither MRT + R nor overlapping MRT showed statistically significant differences compared to the broad-beam (BB) irradiation for A549. In contrast, the normal tissue cell line MRC-5 exhibited significantly higher clonogenic survival following both MRT + R and overlapping MRT compared to BB. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates that combining temporal and spatial fractionation enhances normal tissue cell survival while maintaining equivalent tumor cell kill, potentially increasing the therapeutic index. Our findings support the feasibility of delivering temporally fractionated doses using different MRT modalities and provide clear evidence of the therapeutic benefits of temporally fractionated MRT.
format Article
id doaj-art-e484e94b6599465f9c25b30ac2119567
institution OA Journals
issn 2227-9059
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomedicines
spelling doaj-art-e484e94b6599465f9c25b30ac21195672025-08-20T02:11:15ZengMDPI AGBiomedicines2227-90592025-03-0113367810.3390/biomedicines13030678The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation TherapyJessica Stolz0Kristina Rogal1Sandra Bicher2Johanna Winter3Mabroor Ahmed4Susanne Raulefs5Stephanie E. Combs6Stefan H. Bartzsch7Thomas E. Schmid8Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany<b>Background</b>: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an advanced preclinical approach in radiotherapy that utilizes spatially fractionated dose distributions by collimating x-rays into micrometer-wide, planar beams. While the benefits of temporal fractionation are well established and widely incorporated into conventional radiotherapy protocols, the interplay between MRT and temporal dose fractionation remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate the effects of combining temporal and spatial dose fractionation by assessing clonogenic cell survival following temporally fractionated MRT with varying irradiation angles, compared to conventional broad-beam (BB) irradiation. <b>Methods</b>: A lung tumor cell line (A549) and a normal lung cell line (MRC-5) were irradiated with a total number of four fractions with a 24 h interval between each fraction. We compared a temporally fractionated BB regime to two temporally fractionated MRT schemes with either overlapping MRT fields or MRT fields with a 45° rotation per fraction. Subsequently, the clonogenic cell survival assay was used by analyzing the corresponding survival fractions (SFs). <b>Results</b>: The clonogenic survival of A549 tumor cells differed significantly between microbeam radiation therapy with rotation (MRT + R) and overlapping MRT. However, neither MRT + R nor overlapping MRT showed statistically significant differences compared to the broad-beam (BB) irradiation for A549. In contrast, the normal tissue cell line MRC-5 exhibited significantly higher clonogenic survival following both MRT + R and overlapping MRT compared to BB. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates that combining temporal and spatial fractionation enhances normal tissue cell survival while maintaining equivalent tumor cell kill, potentially increasing the therapeutic index. Our findings support the feasibility of delivering temporally fractionated doses using different MRT modalities and provide clear evidence of the therapeutic benefits of temporally fractionated MRT.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/678microbeam radiation therapyspatially fractionated radiation therapytemporal fractionationlung cancerCFA
spellingShingle Jessica Stolz
Kristina Rogal
Sandra Bicher
Johanna Winter
Mabroor Ahmed
Susanne Raulefs
Stephanie E. Combs
Stefan H. Bartzsch
Thomas E. Schmid
The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
Biomedicines
microbeam radiation therapy
spatially fractionated radiation therapy
temporal fractionation
lung cancer
CFA
title The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
title_full The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
title_short The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy
title_sort combination of temporal and spatial dose fractionation in microbeam radiation therapy
topic microbeam radiation therapy
spatially fractionated radiation therapy
temporal fractionation
lung cancer
CFA
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/678
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicastolz thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT kristinarogal thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT sandrabicher thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT johannawinter thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT mabroorahmed thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT susanneraulefs thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT stephanieecombs thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT stefanhbartzsch thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT thomaseschmid thecombinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT jessicastolz combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT kristinarogal combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT sandrabicher combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT johannawinter combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT mabroorahmed combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT susanneraulefs combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT stephanieecombs combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT stefanhbartzsch combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy
AT thomaseschmid combinationoftemporalandspatialdosefractionationinmicrobeamradiationtherapy