Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects

Heritage conservation projects involve diverse stakeholders, such as property owners, communities, NGOs, and governments, whose “misaligned” incentives produce high transaction costs and often pose persistent challenges. Considering heritage sites as analogous to common pool resources (CPR), this st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Hansley Chua, Yung Yau, Wanling Jian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/7/1152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849730803519455232
author Mark Hansley Chua
Yung Yau
Wanling Jian
author_facet Mark Hansley Chua
Yung Yau
Wanling Jian
author_sort Mark Hansley Chua
collection DOAJ
description Heritage conservation projects involve diverse stakeholders, such as property owners, communities, NGOs, and governments, whose “misaligned” incentives produce high transaction costs and often pose persistent challenges. Considering heritage sites as analogous to common pool resources (CPR), this study examines whether sustainable heritage projects adhere to Elinor Ostrom’s design principles for managing CPRs. The UNESCO Asia-Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation are used as a benchmark to identify best practices in private–public collaborations over the past two decades. Through content analysis of award application dossiers, the researchers assess whether the design principles are applied differently between successful and unsuccessful projects and evaluate the sufficiency of Ostrom’s principles in the heritage conservation context. The findings indicate that four design principles are more consistently balanced in award-winning projects: “Collective Choice Arrangements”, “Congruence with Local Conditions”, “Monitoring Mechanisms”, and “Minimum Recognition of Rights”. Additionally, successful projects tend to incorporate “people growth-oriented activities”, such as skills training and education for local workers and youth, benefiting current and future project beneficiaries. These insights suggest that adapting Ostrom’s design principles can enhance the sustainability of heritage conservation efforts by better aligning stakeholder incentives and addressing the “misalignment of incentives” challenge commonly encountered in such projects.
format Article
id doaj-art-e46fec7f70434c8481c778a44f801ae9
institution DOAJ
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-e46fec7f70434c8481c778a44f801ae92025-08-20T03:08:45ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-04-01157115210.3390/buildings15071152Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage ProjectsMark Hansley Chua0Yung Yau1Wanling Jian2School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaSchool of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaSchool of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong 999077, ChinaHeritage conservation projects involve diverse stakeholders, such as property owners, communities, NGOs, and governments, whose “misaligned” incentives produce high transaction costs and often pose persistent challenges. Considering heritage sites as analogous to common pool resources (CPR), this study examines whether sustainable heritage projects adhere to Elinor Ostrom’s design principles for managing CPRs. The UNESCO Asia-Pacific Awards for Cultural Heritage Conservation are used as a benchmark to identify best practices in private–public collaborations over the past two decades. Through content analysis of award application dossiers, the researchers assess whether the design principles are applied differently between successful and unsuccessful projects and evaluate the sufficiency of Ostrom’s principles in the heritage conservation context. The findings indicate that four design principles are more consistently balanced in award-winning projects: “Collective Choice Arrangements”, “Congruence with Local Conditions”, “Monitoring Mechanisms”, and “Minimum Recognition of Rights”. Additionally, successful projects tend to incorporate “people growth-oriented activities”, such as skills training and education for local workers and youth, benefiting current and future project beneficiaries. These insights suggest that adapting Ostrom’s design principles can enhance the sustainability of heritage conservation efforts by better aligning stakeholder incentives and addressing the “misalignment of incentives” challenge commonly encountered in such projects.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/7/1152design principlescollective actionheritage buildingsgovernance sustainability
spellingShingle Mark Hansley Chua
Yung Yau
Wanling Jian
Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
Buildings
design principles
collective action
heritage buildings
governance sustainability
title Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
title_full Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
title_fullStr Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
title_full_unstemmed Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
title_short Unravelling Ostrom’s Design Principles Underpinning Sustainable Heritage Projects
title_sort unravelling ostrom s design principles underpinning sustainable heritage projects
topic design principles
collective action
heritage buildings
governance sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/7/1152
work_keys_str_mv AT markhansleychua unravellingostromsdesignprinciplesunderpinningsustainableheritageprojects
AT yungyau unravellingostromsdesignprinciplesunderpinningsustainableheritageprojects
AT wanlingjian unravellingostromsdesignprinciplesunderpinningsustainableheritageprojects