80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Peels are simple, inexpensive office procedures with acceptable side effect profiles and make a good treatment modality for patients with melasma. Glycolic acid peels have been used widely for the treatment of melasma. Due to their tendency to cause undesirable side effects such as post-inflammatory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priya P. Kadu, Rachana A. Laul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-05-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849434635574968320
author Priya P. Kadu
Rachana A. Laul
author_facet Priya P. Kadu
Rachana A. Laul
author_sort Priya P. Kadu
collection DOAJ
description Peels are simple, inexpensive office procedures with acceptable side effect profiles and make a good treatment modality for patients with melasma. Glycolic acid peels have been used widely for the treatment of melasma. Due to their tendency to cause undesirable side effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, other modalities need to be studied. To compare the efficacy of 80% lactic acid and 50% glycolic acid peel for the treatment of melasma. This was a prospective, single-blinded (study subjects), randomised study. Forty patients with melasma between the ages of 18–50 years from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Central India were included in the study and randomised to receive either 80% lactic acid peel or 50% glycolic acid peel (20 in the lactic acid group and 20 in the glycolic acid group) for four sessions at 2-week intervals. The efficacy was assessed using Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores calculated at the baseline and at the end of the treatment (10 weeks). The pre- and post-treatment MASI scores were calculated for each treatment, and their difference was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-four patients completed the study over 6 months and were included in the final analysis. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The median (25th–75th percentile) decrease in MASI with glycolic acid 50% peel was 2.85 (1.875–3), which was significantly higher as compared to lactic acid 80% peel, which was 1.8 (1.125–2.4) (P value = 0.009). No significant difference was seen in the side effect profile (P value = 0.105). 50% glycolic acid peel is more efficacious than 80% lactic acid peel for the treatment of melasma.
format Article
id doaj-art-e465f4513bf1432b9af81c831216b177
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
spelling doaj-art-e465f4513bf1432b9af81c831216b1772025-08-20T03:26:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112025-05-0170315215610.4103/ijd.ijd_969_2380% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical TrialPriya P. KaduRachana A. LaulPeels are simple, inexpensive office procedures with acceptable side effect profiles and make a good treatment modality for patients with melasma. Glycolic acid peels have been used widely for the treatment of melasma. Due to their tendency to cause undesirable side effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, other modalities need to be studied. To compare the efficacy of 80% lactic acid and 50% glycolic acid peel for the treatment of melasma. This was a prospective, single-blinded (study subjects), randomised study. Forty patients with melasma between the ages of 18–50 years from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Central India were included in the study and randomised to receive either 80% lactic acid peel or 50% glycolic acid peel (20 in the lactic acid group and 20 in the glycolic acid group) for four sessions at 2-week intervals. The efficacy was assessed using Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores calculated at the baseline and at the end of the treatment (10 weeks). The pre- and post-treatment MASI scores were calculated for each treatment, and their difference was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-four patients completed the study over 6 months and were included in the final analysis. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The median (25th–75th percentile) decrease in MASI with glycolic acid 50% peel was 2.85 (1.875–3), which was significantly higher as compared to lactic acid 80% peel, which was 1.8 (1.125–2.4) (P value = 0.009). No significant difference was seen in the side effect profile (P value = 0.105). 50% glycolic acid peel is more efficacious than 80% lactic acid peel for the treatment of melasma.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23glycoliclacticmelasmapeel
spellingShingle Priya P. Kadu
Rachana A. Laul
80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Indian Journal of Dermatology
glycolic
lactic
melasma
peel
title 80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
title_full 80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
title_fullStr 80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed 80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
title_short 80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial
title_sort 80 lactic acid peel versus 50 glycolic acid peel for melasma a randomised clinical trial
topic glycolic
lactic
melasma
peel
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23
work_keys_str_mv AT priyapkadu 80lacticacidpeelversus50glycolicacidpeelformelasmaarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT rachanaalaul 80lacticacidpeelversus50glycolicacidpeelformelasmaarandomisedclinicaltrial