Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review

This article aims to make a scoping review of Validating Questionnaires used in the field of lower limb (LL) rehabilitation in which systems, devices or exergames are used. Its main objective is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results obtained in the validation of questionnaires...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angie D. Moscoso, Vera Z. Pérez, Manuel J. Betancur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/13/1/4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587464652357632
author Angie D. Moscoso
Vera Z. Pérez
Manuel J. Betancur
author_facet Angie D. Moscoso
Vera Z. Pérez
Manuel J. Betancur
author_sort Angie D. Moscoso
collection DOAJ
description This article aims to make a scoping review of Validating Questionnaires used in the field of lower limb (LL) rehabilitation in which systems, devices or exergames are used. Its main objective is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results obtained in the validation of questionnaires, as well as to identify specific criteria for evaluating systems, devices or exergames in the area of LL rehabilitation, through the analysis of validating instruments and their application in different associated contexts. The article details the methodology employed, a PRISMA ScR method review which included database research and an evaluation of the selected studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select all relevant studies, resulting in 81 studies after initial review based on titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the criteria were again applied to read the full text, resulting in 58 final studies. The document distinguishes between standardized and non-standardized validating questionnaires, emphasizing that standardized validating questionnaires have undergone rigorous statistical processes to ensure their validity, reliability and consistency. The information compiled in the tables provides a solid basis for identifying and evaluating validation questionnaires in the above-mentioned context. This resource constitutes an accurate and reliable reference for selecting the most appropriate instruments for future research and comparisons with similar work. This article is a valuable resource for those interested in the validation of questionnaires used in the field of lower limb rehabilitation systems/devices/exergames.
format Article
id doaj-art-e464f0df5b45406a9f2ec634538285b9
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-4663
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj-art-e464f0df5b45406a9f2ec634538285b92025-01-24T13:49:50ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632025-01-01131410.3390/sports13010004Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping ReviewAngie D. Moscoso0Vera Z. Pérez1Manuel J. Betancur2Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, ColombiaFacultad de Ingeniería Electrónica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, ColombiaFacultad de Ingeniería Electrónica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, ColombiaThis article aims to make a scoping review of Validating Questionnaires used in the field of lower limb (LL) rehabilitation in which systems, devices or exergames are used. Its main objective is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results obtained in the validation of questionnaires, as well as to identify specific criteria for evaluating systems, devices or exergames in the area of LL rehabilitation, through the analysis of validating instruments and their application in different associated contexts. The article details the methodology employed, a PRISMA ScR method review which included database research and an evaluation of the selected studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select all relevant studies, resulting in 81 studies after initial review based on titles and abstracts. Subsequently, the criteria were again applied to read the full text, resulting in 58 final studies. The document distinguishes between standardized and non-standardized validating questionnaires, emphasizing that standardized validating questionnaires have undergone rigorous statistical processes to ensure their validity, reliability and consistency. The information compiled in the tables provides a solid basis for identifying and evaluating validation questionnaires in the above-mentioned context. This resource constitutes an accurate and reliable reference for selecting the most appropriate instruments for future research and comparisons with similar work. This article is a valuable resource for those interested in the validation of questionnaires used in the field of lower limb rehabilitation systems/devices/exergames.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/13/1/4validating questionnairesexergameslower limbsrehabilitation
spellingShingle Angie D. Moscoso
Vera Z. Pérez
Manuel J. Betancur
Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
Sports
validating questionnaires
exergames
lower limbs
rehabilitation
title Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
title_full Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
title_short Validating Questionnaires for Lower Limb Rehabilitation Systems and Devices: A Scoping Review
title_sort validating questionnaires for lower limb rehabilitation systems and devices a scoping review
topic validating questionnaires
exergames
lower limbs
rehabilitation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/13/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT angiedmoscoso validatingquestionnairesforlowerlimbrehabilitationsystemsanddevicesascopingreview
AT verazperez validatingquestionnairesforlowerlimbrehabilitationsystemsanddevicesascopingreview
AT manueljbetancur validatingquestionnairesforlowerlimbrehabilitationsystemsanddevicesascopingreview