Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials

Abstract Background Fractionated atrial potential (FAP) during sinus rhythm (SR) may be a new target for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effects of the direction of activation and premature atrial contraction (PAC) on FAP is unknown. Therefore, we examined the impact of anisotropi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hideko Toyama, Koichiro Kumagai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13161
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850062075936636928
author Hideko Toyama
Koichiro Kumagai
author_facet Hideko Toyama
Koichiro Kumagai
author_sort Hideko Toyama
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Fractionated atrial potential (FAP) during sinus rhythm (SR) may be a new target for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effects of the direction of activation and premature atrial contraction (PAC) on FAP is unknown. Therefore, we examined the impact of anisotropic conduction and PAC on the distribution and areas of FAP. Methods FAP map in the left atrium was created in 40 patients with AF before ablation. The distribution and areas of FAP were compared during SR, distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing (S1) and extrastimulus (S2), and paced PAC after SR. FAP was defined as a potential with four or more fragmented deflections. Results FAPs during SR were found in the right and mid‐anterior walls and septum in most patients. During S1 compared to SR, FAPs significantly decreased in the right and mid‐anterior walls, appendage, septum, and right inferior wall, while significantly increased in the lateral wall. During S2 compared to S1, FAPs significantly increased in the mid anterior and right and mid posterior walls. During PAC compared to SR, FAPs significantly decreased in the right and mid anterior walls and roof, while significantly increased in the left anterior, left inferior and lateral walls. A rotational activation pattern at the FAP area during CS pacing was observed in 12 patients (30%), mostly in the left inferior wall. Conclusions The distribution and areas of FAP vary with anisotropic conduction and extrastimulus. Therefore, FAP should be evaluated not only during SR but also during extrastimulus from the distal CS.
format Article
id doaj-art-e460fe3f329c4ca39909e5d6318c99db
institution DOAJ
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj-art-e460fe3f329c4ca39909e5d6318c99db2025-08-20T02:50:01ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482024-12-014061381138810.1002/joa3.13161Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentialsHideko Toyama0Koichiro Kumagai1Heart Rhythm Center Fukuoka Sanno Hospital Fukuoka JapanHeart Rhythm Center Fukuoka Sanno Hospital Fukuoka JapanAbstract Background Fractionated atrial potential (FAP) during sinus rhythm (SR) may be a new target for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effects of the direction of activation and premature atrial contraction (PAC) on FAP is unknown. Therefore, we examined the impact of anisotropic conduction and PAC on the distribution and areas of FAP. Methods FAP map in the left atrium was created in 40 patients with AF before ablation. The distribution and areas of FAP were compared during SR, distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing (S1) and extrastimulus (S2), and paced PAC after SR. FAP was defined as a potential with four or more fragmented deflections. Results FAPs during SR were found in the right and mid‐anterior walls and septum in most patients. During S1 compared to SR, FAPs significantly decreased in the right and mid‐anterior walls, appendage, septum, and right inferior wall, while significantly increased in the lateral wall. During S2 compared to S1, FAPs significantly increased in the mid anterior and right and mid posterior walls. During PAC compared to SR, FAPs significantly decreased in the right and mid anterior walls and roof, while significantly increased in the left anterior, left inferior and lateral walls. A rotational activation pattern at the FAP area during CS pacing was observed in 12 patients (30%), mostly in the left inferior wall. Conclusions The distribution and areas of FAP vary with anisotropic conduction and extrastimulus. Therefore, FAP should be evaluated not only during SR but also during extrastimulus from the distal CS.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13161atrial fibrillationfractionated potentialhigh‐density mappingpremature atrial contraction
spellingShingle Hideko Toyama
Koichiro Kumagai
Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
Journal of Arrhythmia
atrial fibrillation
fractionated potential
high‐density mapping
premature atrial contraction
title Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
title_full Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
title_fullStr Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
title_full_unstemmed Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
title_short Impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
title_sort impact of anisotropic conduction and premature atrial contraction on the fractionated atrial potentials
topic atrial fibrillation
fractionated potential
high‐density mapping
premature atrial contraction
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT hidekotoyama impactofanisotropicconductionandprematureatrialcontractiononthefractionatedatrialpotentials
AT koichirokumagai impactofanisotropicconductionandprematureatrialcontractiononthefractionatedatrialpotentials