Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas

ABSTRACT Wildlife populations are increasingly threatened by human activities. Most studies, however, are often short in duration or do not encompass the large spatial extent necessary to measure the potential effects of human activities on population vital rates. Furthermore, the life history featu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariana L. Cerreta, Jennifer R. Adams, Bridget L. Borg, Mathew S. Sorum, Lisette P. Waits, David E. Ausband
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71420
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849469825956446208
author Ariana L. Cerreta
Jennifer R. Adams
Bridget L. Borg
Mathew S. Sorum
Lisette P. Waits
David E. Ausband
author_facet Ariana L. Cerreta
Jennifer R. Adams
Bridget L. Borg
Mathew S. Sorum
Lisette P. Waits
David E. Ausband
author_sort Ariana L. Cerreta
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Wildlife populations are increasingly threatened by human activities. Most studies, however, are often short in duration or do not encompass the large spatial extent necessary to measure the potential effects of human activities on population vital rates. Furthermore, the life history features of species with high fecundity and excellent dispersal capabilities can act as buffers against the potential negative effects of human activities on their populations. We used a 30‐year dataset of genetic samples from gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Alaska, USA, to examine genetic connectivity and diversity between National Park units separated by a region with recurrent human‐caused mortality. We found that the two protected populations were genetically similar and that dispersal events occurred between them even though they are > 450 km apart. We posit that intact ecosystems and a history of continuous distribution of wolves surrounding the affected regions likely maintained the genetic connectivity of wolves in the two protected areas.
format Article
id doaj-art-e444b310eb9d465297168191b7fa7a8b
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-e444b310eb9d465297168191b7fa7a8b2025-08-20T03:25:20ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-05-01155n/an/a10.1002/ece3.71420Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected AreasAriana L. Cerreta0Jennifer R. Adams1Bridget L. Borg2Mathew S. Sorum3Lisette P. Waits4David E. Ausband5Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USALaboratory for Ecological, Evolutionary and Conservation Genetics, Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USANational Park Service Denali National Park and Preserve Denali Park Alaska USANational Park Service Yukon‐Charley Rivers National Preserve Fairbanks Alaska USADepartment of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USAU.S. Geological Survey, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USAABSTRACT Wildlife populations are increasingly threatened by human activities. Most studies, however, are often short in duration or do not encompass the large spatial extent necessary to measure the potential effects of human activities on population vital rates. Furthermore, the life history features of species with high fecundity and excellent dispersal capabilities can act as buffers against the potential negative effects of human activities on their populations. We used a 30‐year dataset of genetic samples from gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Alaska, USA, to examine genetic connectivity and diversity between National Park units separated by a region with recurrent human‐caused mortality. We found that the two protected populations were genetically similar and that dispersal events occurred between them even though they are > 450 km apart. We posit that intact ecosystems and a history of continuous distribution of wolves surrounding the affected regions likely maintained the genetic connectivity of wolves in the two protected areas.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71420AlaskaCanis lupusdispersalmicrosatellitespedigree reconstructionwolf
spellingShingle Ariana L. Cerreta
Jennifer R. Adams
Bridget L. Borg
Mathew S. Sorum
Lisette P. Waits
David E. Ausband
Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
Ecology and Evolution
Alaska
Canis lupus
dispersal
microsatellites
pedigree reconstruction
wolf
title Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
title_full Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
title_fullStr Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
title_short Genetic Connectivity in a Cooperatively Breeding Carnivore Between Two Protected Areas
title_sort genetic connectivity in a cooperatively breeding carnivore between two protected areas
topic Alaska
Canis lupus
dispersal
microsatellites
pedigree reconstruction
wolf
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71420
work_keys_str_mv AT arianalcerreta geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas
AT jenniferradams geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas
AT bridgetlborg geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas
AT mathewssorum geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas
AT lisettepwaits geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas
AT davideausband geneticconnectivityinacooperativelybreedingcarnivorebetweentwoprotectedareas