Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment

Abstract Marine copepod communities play crucial roles in ocean ecosystems. However, their accurate assessment remains challenging due to taxonomic complexities. This study combines morphological and DNA metabarcoding approaches to evaluate copepod diversity and community structure in the northern E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: So-yeon Kim, Seongmin Cheon, Chungoo Park, Ho Young Soh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89684-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849767174298664960
author So-yeon Kim
Seongmin Cheon
Chungoo Park
Ho Young Soh
author_facet So-yeon Kim
Seongmin Cheon
Chungoo Park
Ho Young Soh
author_sort So-yeon Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Marine copepod communities play crucial roles in ocean ecosystems. However, their accurate assessment remains challenging due to taxonomic complexities. This study combines morphological and DNA metabarcoding approaches to evaluate copepod diversity and community structure in the northern East China Sea. Zooplankton samples were collected from 10 stations along a coastal-offshore gradient in August 2019. Morphological analysis identified 34 species from 25 genera, while DNA metabarcoding detected 31 species from 20 genera. Both methods revealed distinct coastal and offshore assemblages, with Paracalanus parvus s.l. as the dominant species across all stations. A significant positive correlation was found between morphology-based individual counts and metabarcoding sequence reads (Spearman’s Rho = 0.58, p < 0.001), improving at the genus level (Rho = 0.70, p < 0.001). Redundancy analysis revealed that salinity, temperature, and phytoplankton density significantly influenced copepod distribution. Although both approaches captured similar broad-scale patterns, they provided complementary insights into community structure. Morphological identification was more effective for detecting Cyclopoida diversity, whereas DNA metabarcoding had greater sensitivity for specific Calanoid species. This study underscores the value of integrating traditional and molecular methods for marine biodiversity assessment, especially in the context of global environmental changes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e44084496a3b43cb965bafc9b9493806
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-e44084496a3b43cb965bafc9b94938062025-08-20T03:04:20ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-89684-9Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessmentSo-yeon Kim0Seongmin Cheon1Chungoo Park2Ho Young Soh3Interdisciplinary Program of Bigdata Fishery Resources Management, Chonnam National UniversitySchool of Biological Sciences and Technology, Chonnam National UniversityInterdisciplinary Program of Bigdata Fishery Resources Management, Chonnam National UniversityInterdisciplinary Program of Bigdata Fishery Resources Management, Chonnam National UniversityAbstract Marine copepod communities play crucial roles in ocean ecosystems. However, their accurate assessment remains challenging due to taxonomic complexities. This study combines morphological and DNA metabarcoding approaches to evaluate copepod diversity and community structure in the northern East China Sea. Zooplankton samples were collected from 10 stations along a coastal-offshore gradient in August 2019. Morphological analysis identified 34 species from 25 genera, while DNA metabarcoding detected 31 species from 20 genera. Both methods revealed distinct coastal and offshore assemblages, with Paracalanus parvus s.l. as the dominant species across all stations. A significant positive correlation was found between morphology-based individual counts and metabarcoding sequence reads (Spearman’s Rho = 0.58, p < 0.001), improving at the genus level (Rho = 0.70, p < 0.001). Redundancy analysis revealed that salinity, temperature, and phytoplankton density significantly influenced copepod distribution. Although both approaches captured similar broad-scale patterns, they provided complementary insights into community structure. Morphological identification was more effective for detecting Cyclopoida diversity, whereas DNA metabarcoding had greater sensitivity for specific Calanoid species. This study underscores the value of integrating traditional and molecular methods for marine biodiversity assessment, especially in the context of global environmental changes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89684-9Copepod diversityDNA metabarcodingMorphological identificationEast China SeaZooplankton ecologyMarine biodiversity assessment
spellingShingle So-yeon Kim
Seongmin Cheon
Chungoo Park
Ho Young Soh
Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
Scientific Reports
Copepod diversity
DNA metabarcoding
Morphological identification
East China Sea
Zooplankton ecology
Marine biodiversity assessment
title Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
title_full Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
title_fullStr Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
title_full_unstemmed Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
title_short Integrating DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
title_sort integrating dna metabarcoding and morphological analysis improves marine zooplankton biodiversity assessment
topic Copepod diversity
DNA metabarcoding
Morphological identification
East China Sea
Zooplankton ecology
Marine biodiversity assessment
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89684-9
work_keys_str_mv AT soyeonkim integratingdnametabarcodingandmorphologicalanalysisimprovesmarinezooplanktonbiodiversityassessment
AT seongmincheon integratingdnametabarcodingandmorphologicalanalysisimprovesmarinezooplanktonbiodiversityassessment
AT chungoopark integratingdnametabarcodingandmorphologicalanalysisimprovesmarinezooplanktonbiodiversityassessment
AT hoyoungsoh integratingdnametabarcodingandmorphologicalanalysisimprovesmarinezooplanktonbiodiversityassessment