Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis

Objective: Our goal was to characterize a large group of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular epinephrine (IM EPI) and a corticosteroid (CS), and to determine the impact of pharmacologic intervention on the rate and timing of biphasi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William Bonadio, Connor Welsh, Brad Pradarelli, Yunfai Ng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2024-10-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jj04687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825201953713422336
author William Bonadio
Connor Welsh
Brad Pradarelli
Yunfai Ng
author_facet William Bonadio
Connor Welsh
Brad Pradarelli
Yunfai Ng
author_sort William Bonadio
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Our goal was to characterize a large group of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular epinephrine (IM EPI) and a corticosteroid (CS), and to determine the impact of pharmacologic intervention on the rate and timing of biphasic reactions (BPR). Methods: We reviewed consecutive children diagnosed with acute anaphylaxis managed in three EDs during a six-year period. All received IM EPI and CS, followed by monitoring for 4–6 hours post-treatment. We analyzed the rate and timing of BPR, comparing the intervals of 0–4 vs 4–48 hours after initiating therapy. Results: During the study period, there were 371 cases of anaphylaxis, of which 357 (94%) received both IM EPI and CS. Of these, 49 (14%) manifested BPR [84% had received prehospital IM EPI] requiring at least one additional dose of IM EPI [14% required ≥2 additional doses]. All BPR episodes occurred within the 0–4 hour interval after initiating therapy, whereas no patient manifested a BPR requiring an additional dose of IM EPI during the 4–48 hours after initiating therapy (P = <0.001, 95% CI 0–1.3%). No patient returned to the ED with recurrence of anaphylaxis symptoms within 48 hours after discharge. Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 7 children with anaphylaxis experience a biphasic reaction after receiving intramuscular epinephrine. Children with anaphylaxis who exhibit symptomatic resolution four hours following initiation of therapy have a low risk for subsequently developing BPR. Most BPR cases required only one additional dose of IM EPI to effect resolution. The rate of BPR in those receiving IM EPI and a corticosteroid is significantly lower >4 hours vs <4 hours after initiating therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-e439849f95c249ae9714da11e1cb9729
institution Kabale University
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-e439849f95c249ae9714da11e1cb97292025-02-07T16:29:04ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182024-10-0126117117510.5811/westjem.1855518555Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with AnaphylaxisWilliam Bonadio0Connor Welsh1Brad Pradarelli2Yunfai Ng3Mount Sinai Morningside Medical Center, New York, New YorkMount Sinai Morningside Medical Center, New York, New YorkMount Sinai Morningside Medical Center, New York, New YorkMount Sinai Morningside Medical Center, New York, New YorkObjective: Our goal was to characterize a large group of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute anaphylaxis, treated with intramuscular epinephrine (IM EPI) and a corticosteroid (CS), and to determine the impact of pharmacologic intervention on the rate and timing of biphasic reactions (BPR). Methods: We reviewed consecutive children diagnosed with acute anaphylaxis managed in three EDs during a six-year period. All received IM EPI and CS, followed by monitoring for 4–6 hours post-treatment. We analyzed the rate and timing of BPR, comparing the intervals of 0–4 vs 4–48 hours after initiating therapy. Results: During the study period, there were 371 cases of anaphylaxis, of which 357 (94%) received both IM EPI and CS. Of these, 49 (14%) manifested BPR [84% had received prehospital IM EPI] requiring at least one additional dose of IM EPI [14% required ≥2 additional doses]. All BPR episodes occurred within the 0–4 hour interval after initiating therapy, whereas no patient manifested a BPR requiring an additional dose of IM EPI during the 4–48 hours after initiating therapy (P = <0.001, 95% CI 0–1.3%). No patient returned to the ED with recurrence of anaphylaxis symptoms within 48 hours after discharge. Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 7 children with anaphylaxis experience a biphasic reaction after receiving intramuscular epinephrine. Children with anaphylaxis who exhibit symptomatic resolution four hours following initiation of therapy have a low risk for subsequently developing BPR. Most BPR cases required only one additional dose of IM EPI to effect resolution. The rate of BPR in those receiving IM EPI and a corticosteroid is significantly lower >4 hours vs <4 hours after initiating therapy.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jj04687
spellingShingle William Bonadio
Connor Welsh
Brad Pradarelli
Yunfai Ng
Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
title_full Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
title_fullStr Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
title_short Impact of Treatment on Rate of Biphasic Reaction in Children with Anaphylaxis
title_sort impact of treatment on rate of biphasic reaction in children with anaphylaxis
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jj04687
work_keys_str_mv AT williambonadio impactoftreatmentonrateofbiphasicreactioninchildrenwithanaphylaxis
AT connorwelsh impactoftreatmentonrateofbiphasicreactioninchildrenwithanaphylaxis
AT bradpradarelli impactoftreatmentonrateofbiphasicreactioninchildrenwithanaphylaxis
AT yunfaing impactoftreatmentonrateofbiphasicreactioninchildrenwithanaphylaxis