Forecasting 3D Rupture Dynamics of the Alto Tiberina Low-Angle Normal Fault, Italy

The seismic potential of active low-angle normal faults (LANFs, <30° dip) remains enigmatic under Andersonian faulting theory, which predicts that normal faults dipping less than 30° should be inactive. The Alto Tiberina fault (ATF) in the northern Apennines, a partly creeping 17°-dipping LANF,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathilde Marchandon, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Lauro Chiaraluce, Elisa Tinti, Emanuele Casarotti, James Biemiller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: McGill University 2025-08-01
Series:Seismica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://seismica.library.mcgill.ca/article/view/1603
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The seismic potential of active low-angle normal faults (LANFs, <30° dip) remains enigmatic under Andersonian faulting theory, which predicts that normal faults dipping less than 30° should be inactive. The Alto Tiberina fault (ATF) in the northern Apennines, a partly creeping 17°-dipping LANF, has not been associated with any historical earthquakes but could potentially generate earthquakes up to Mw~7. We investigate the mechanical preconditions and dynamic plausibility of large ATF earthquakes using 3D dynamic rupture and seismic wave propagation simulations constrained by multidisciplinary data from the Alto Tiberina Near Fault Observatory (TABOO-NFO). Our models incorporate the complex non-planar ATF fault geometry, including hanging wall secondary faults and a recent geodetic coupling model. We show that potential large earthquakes (up to Mw~7.4) are mechanically viable under Andersonian extensional stress conditions if the ATF is statically relatively weak (μs=0.37). Large earthquakes only nucleate on favorably oriented, steeper fault sections (dip ≥30°), and remain confined to the coupled portion, limiting earthquake magnitude. These ruptures may dynamically trigger an intersecting synthetic branch but are unlikely to affect more distant antithetic faults. Jointly integrating fault geometry and geodetic coupling is crucial for forecasting dynamic rupture nucleation and propagation.
ISSN:2816-9387