Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma
ABSTRACT Woodrats (Neotoma spp.) are imperiled in large swathes of the United States. Their populations have previously been monitored mainly through live‐trapping and sign surveys. However, these methods are labor‐intensive and either stress captured animals or limited by sign visibility and persis...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.929 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850064260356374528 |
|---|---|
| author | Aaron C. Gooley Eric M. Schauber |
| author_facet | Aaron C. Gooley Eric M. Schauber |
| author_sort | Aaron C. Gooley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Woodrats (Neotoma spp.) are imperiled in large swathes of the United States. Their populations have previously been monitored mainly through live‐trapping and sign surveys. However, these methods are labor‐intensive and either stress captured animals or limited by sign visibility and persistence. As noninvasive alternatives, we deployed baited camera traps and baited track plates to monitor eastern woodrat (N. floridana) presence along rocky outcrops at 4 woodrat reintroduction sites in southern Illinois, USA, during May 2013 (5 camera and track‐plate stations/site) and May and September 2014 (4 camera and track‐plate stations/site) to compare their effectiveness. During each deployment, camera traps detected woodrat presence at all 4 sites while track plates only detected presence at 2–3 sites. A greater proportion of camera traps than track plates recorded detections during each deployment. Camera traps required more person‐hours to deploy and retrieve, but resulted in more detections per hour effort than track plates. We conclude that baited camera traps are superior to baited track plates for detecting and monitoring woodrat presence. © 2018 The Wildlife Society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e3c98577cae943758d08efd8f834c2c3 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-e3c98577cae943758d08efd8f834c2c32025-08-20T02:49:20ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402018-12-0142470170510.1002/wsb.929Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for NeotomaAaron C. Gooley0Eric M. Schauber1Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Department of ZoologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleIL62901USACooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Department of ZoologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleIL62901USAABSTRACT Woodrats (Neotoma spp.) are imperiled in large swathes of the United States. Their populations have previously been monitored mainly through live‐trapping and sign surveys. However, these methods are labor‐intensive and either stress captured animals or limited by sign visibility and persistence. As noninvasive alternatives, we deployed baited camera traps and baited track plates to monitor eastern woodrat (N. floridana) presence along rocky outcrops at 4 woodrat reintroduction sites in southern Illinois, USA, during May 2013 (5 camera and track‐plate stations/site) and May and September 2014 (4 camera and track‐plate stations/site) to compare their effectiveness. During each deployment, camera traps detected woodrat presence at all 4 sites while track plates only detected presence at 2–3 sites. A greater proportion of camera traps than track plates recorded detections during each deployment. Camera traps required more person‐hours to deploy and retrieve, but resulted in more detections per hour effort than track plates. We conclude that baited camera traps are superior to baited track plates for detecting and monitoring woodrat presence. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.929camera trapeastern woodratillinoismonitoringNeotomanoninvasive |
| spellingShingle | Aaron C. Gooley Eric M. Schauber Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma Wildlife Society Bulletin camera trap eastern woodrat illinois monitoring Neotoma noninvasive |
| title | Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma |
| title_full | Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma |
| title_fullStr | Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma |
| title_short | Pursuing packrats: An evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for Neotoma |
| title_sort | pursuing packrats an evaluation of noninvasive detection methods for neotoma |
| topic | camera trap eastern woodrat illinois monitoring Neotoma noninvasive |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.929 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aaroncgooley pursuingpackratsanevaluationofnoninvasivedetectionmethodsforneotoma AT ericmschauber pursuingpackratsanevaluationofnoninvasivedetectionmethodsforneotoma |