The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance

To investigate the investigation of gut microbial communities to chicken egg production performance during different laying stages, we conducted a comparative study of the diversity, composition, and function of microbial communities in the fecal and cecal contents of six hens at the early stage, 25...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziyu Li, Bo Zeng, Tao Wang, Lizhi Lu, Hang Zhong, Yuan Su, Diyan Li, Wenwu Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Cellular Microbiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/cmi/5586545
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850280515920199680
author Ziyu Li
Bo Zeng
Tao Wang
Lizhi Lu
Hang Zhong
Yuan Su
Diyan Li
Wenwu Xu
author_facet Ziyu Li
Bo Zeng
Tao Wang
Lizhi Lu
Hang Zhong
Yuan Su
Diyan Li
Wenwu Xu
author_sort Ziyu Li
collection DOAJ
description To investigate the investigation of gut microbial communities to chicken egg production performance during different laying stages, we conducted a comparative study of the diversity, composition, and function of microbial communities in the fecal and cecal contents of six hens at the early stage, 25 at the peak stage, and 15 at the late stage. We obtained clean data averaging 13.40 and 13.79 Gb for each of the fecal and cecal content samples. The metagenomic analysis revealed significant differences in fecal and cecal content microbial diversity during different laying stages, especially during the peak stage, and the microbiota structure of fecal contents was more stable compared to that of cecal contents. The dominant microflora in the fecal contents during the peak stage were Firmicutes (74.84%) and Lactobacillus (28.13%). The dominant microflora of cecal contents during different stages were basically the same at the phylum level and genus level. During the peak stage, the dominant bacteria shared by microorganisms in the fecal and cecal contents were Lactobacillus. Functional analyses of the gut microbiome indicate that fecal and cecal content microbes have different functional capacities at different egg-laying stages. We therefore hypothesized that the gut microbiome would vary with laying stage and have a non-negligible effect on egg production performance. These results improved our ability to provide some theoretical basis for feeding management of laying hens during different laying stages and provided insights into the influence of the gut microbiota on the laying performance of chickens.
format Article
id doaj-art-e3b358d0da84443a8d5355fffbf24c68
institution OA Journals
issn 1462-5822
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cellular Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-e3b358d0da84443a8d5355fffbf24c682025-08-20T01:48:41ZengWileyCellular Microbiology1462-58222025-01-01202510.1155/cmi/5586545The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production PerformanceZiyu Li0Bo Zeng1Tao Wang2Lizhi Lu3Hang Zhong4Yuan Su5Diyan Li6Wenwu Xu7School of PharmacyCollege of Animal Science and TechnologySchool of PharmacyState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-ProductsChongqing Academy of Animal SciencesCollege of Animal SciencesSchool of PharmacyState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-ProductsTo investigate the investigation of gut microbial communities to chicken egg production performance during different laying stages, we conducted a comparative study of the diversity, composition, and function of microbial communities in the fecal and cecal contents of six hens at the early stage, 25 at the peak stage, and 15 at the late stage. We obtained clean data averaging 13.40 and 13.79 Gb for each of the fecal and cecal content samples. The metagenomic analysis revealed significant differences in fecal and cecal content microbial diversity during different laying stages, especially during the peak stage, and the microbiota structure of fecal contents was more stable compared to that of cecal contents. The dominant microflora in the fecal contents during the peak stage were Firmicutes (74.84%) and Lactobacillus (28.13%). The dominant microflora of cecal contents during different stages were basically the same at the phylum level and genus level. During the peak stage, the dominant bacteria shared by microorganisms in the fecal and cecal contents were Lactobacillus. Functional analyses of the gut microbiome indicate that fecal and cecal content microbes have different functional capacities at different egg-laying stages. We therefore hypothesized that the gut microbiome would vary with laying stage and have a non-negligible effect on egg production performance. These results improved our ability to provide some theoretical basis for feeding management of laying hens during different laying stages and provided insights into the influence of the gut microbiota on the laying performance of chickens.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/cmi/5586545
spellingShingle Ziyu Li
Bo Zeng
Tao Wang
Lizhi Lu
Hang Zhong
Yuan Su
Diyan Li
Wenwu Xu
The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
Cellular Microbiology
title The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
title_full The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
title_fullStr The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
title_short The Chicken Gut Metagenome at Different Egg-Laying Stages and Its Correlation With Egg Production Performance
title_sort chicken gut metagenome at different egg laying stages and its correlation with egg production performance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/cmi/5586545
work_keys_str_mv AT ziyuli thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT bozeng thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT taowang thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT lizhilu thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT hangzhong thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT yuansu thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT diyanli thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT wenwuxu thechickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT ziyuli chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT bozeng chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT taowang chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT lizhilu chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT hangzhong chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT yuansu chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT diyanli chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance
AT wenwuxu chickengutmetagenomeatdifferentegglayingstagesanditscorrelationwitheggproductionperformance