Microphysics of Circumgalactic Turbulence Probed by Fast Radio Bursts and Quasars

The circumgalactic medium (CGM) is poorly constrained at the subparsec scales relevant to turbulent energy dissipation and regulation of multiphase structure. Fast radio bursts are sensitive to small-scale plasma density fluctuations, which can induce multipath propagation (scattering). The amount o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stella Koch Ocker, Mandy C. Chen, S. Peng Oh, Prateek Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade0bc
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The circumgalactic medium (CGM) is poorly constrained at the subparsec scales relevant to turbulent energy dissipation and regulation of multiphase structure. Fast radio bursts are sensitive to small-scale plasma density fluctuations, which can induce multipath propagation (scattering). The amount of scattering depends on the density fluctuation spectrum, including its amplitude ${C}_{{\rm{n}}}^{2}$ , spectral index β , and dissipation scale l _i . We use quasar observations of CGM turbulence at ≳pc scales to infer ${C}_{{\rm{n}}}^{2}$ , finding it to be $1{0}^{-16}\lesssim {C}_{{\rm{n}}}^{2}\lesssim 1{0}^{-9}$ m ^−20/3 for hot ( T > 10 ^6 K) gas and $1{0}^{-8}\lesssim {C}_{{\rm{n}}}^{2}\lesssim 1{0}^{-4}$ m ^−20/3 for cool (10 ^4 ≲ T ≲ 10 ^5 K) gas, depending on the gas sound speed and density. These values of ${C}_{{\rm{n}}}^{2}$ are much smaller than those inferred in the interstellar medium at similar physical scales. The resulting scattering delays from the hot CGM are negligible (≪1 μ s at 1 GHz), but they are more detectable from the cool gas as either radio pulse broadening or scintillation, depending on the observing frequency and sightline geometry. Joint quasar-FRB observations of individual galaxies can yield lower limits on l _i , even if the CGM is not a significant scattering site. An initial comparison between quasar and FRB observations (albeit for different systems) suggests l _i ≳ 750 km in ∼10 ^4 K gas in order for the quasar and FRB constraints to be consistent. If a foreground CGM is completely ruled out as a source of scattering along an FRB sightline, then l _i may be comparable to the smallest cloud sizes (≲pc) inferred from photoionization modeling of quasar absorption lines.
ISSN:1538-4357