Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: There are numerous techniques for the surgical treatment of Achilles tendon lesions described in the literature, and it is possible to distinguish repair techniques as either open surgery or percutaneous repair techniques. Both approaches have advantages...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaetano Caruso, Edoardo Gambuti, Achille Saracco, Elisa Spadoni, Elena Corso, Ilaria Pinotti, Alessandro Pisano, Leo Massari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-08-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/9/1382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850260393109225472
author Gaetano Caruso
Edoardo Gambuti
Achille Saracco
Elisa Spadoni
Elena Corso
Ilaria Pinotti
Alessandro Pisano
Leo Massari
author_facet Gaetano Caruso
Edoardo Gambuti
Achille Saracco
Elisa Spadoni
Elena Corso
Ilaria Pinotti
Alessandro Pisano
Leo Massari
author_sort Gaetano Caruso
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives</i>: There are numerous techniques for the surgical treatment of Achilles tendon lesions described in the literature, and it is possible to distinguish repair techniques as either open surgery or percutaneous repair techniques. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. With this retrospective study, we aim to analyze the incidence of re-ruptures and other complications, return to sport and overall quality of life at a long-term follow-up in the treatment of acute ATRs, comparing the results of percutaneous repair with those of open repair. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This is a retrospective study on a consecutive series of patients with complete tear of the AT who were managed through a surgical approach by the Operative Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Sant’Anna University Hospital (Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy) between April 2014 and December 2021. Patients were treated with a percutaneous or an open technique according to the surgeon’s preference without randomization. <i>Results</i>: We considered 155 patients who met the established inclusion criteria. Of these, 103 (66.45%) patients underwent percutaneous treatment with the Tenolig<sup>®</sup> system, and 52 (33.55%) underwent open surgery, with an average ATRS in the first group of 92.5 compared to an average ATRS value of 82 in patients treated with the open technique. <i>Conclusions</i>: In our experience, following overlapping rehabilitation protocols in all patients included, we observed that the Tenolig<sup>®</sup> repair system led to a better ATRS at long-term follow-up, with comparable complication rates to open surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-e38fb7a0fa404d1b813b39743e2464e0
institution OA Journals
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-e38fb7a0fa404d1b813b39743e2464e02025-08-20T01:55:38ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442024-08-01609138210.3390/medicina60091382Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-UpGaetano Caruso0Edoardo Gambuti1Achille Saracco2Elisa Spadoni3Elena Corso4Ilaria Pinotti5Alessandro Pisano6Leo Massari7Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, c/o “S. Anna”, via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy<i>Background and Objectives</i>: There are numerous techniques for the surgical treatment of Achilles tendon lesions described in the literature, and it is possible to distinguish repair techniques as either open surgery or percutaneous repair techniques. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. With this retrospective study, we aim to analyze the incidence of re-ruptures and other complications, return to sport and overall quality of life at a long-term follow-up in the treatment of acute ATRs, comparing the results of percutaneous repair with those of open repair. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This is a retrospective study on a consecutive series of patients with complete tear of the AT who were managed through a surgical approach by the Operative Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Sant’Anna University Hospital (Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy) between April 2014 and December 2021. Patients were treated with a percutaneous or an open technique according to the surgeon’s preference without randomization. <i>Results</i>: We considered 155 patients who met the established inclusion criteria. Of these, 103 (66.45%) patients underwent percutaneous treatment with the Tenolig<sup>®</sup> system, and 52 (33.55%) underwent open surgery, with an average ATRS in the first group of 92.5 compared to an average ATRS value of 82 in patients treated with the open technique. <i>Conclusions</i>: In our experience, following overlapping rehabilitation protocols in all patients included, we observed that the Tenolig<sup>®</sup> repair system led to a better ATRS at long-term follow-up, with comparable complication rates to open surgery.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/9/1382Achilles tendontendon rupturesTenolig<sup>®</sup> repair systemtendon open repairtraumatologytrauma surgery
spellingShingle Gaetano Caruso
Edoardo Gambuti
Achille Saracco
Elisa Spadoni
Elena Corso
Ilaria Pinotti
Alessandro Pisano
Leo Massari
Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
Medicina
Achilles tendon
tendon ruptures
Tenolig<sup>®</sup> repair system
tendon open repair
traumatology
trauma surgery
title Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
title_fullStr Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
title_short Open vs. Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair: Experience of Single Orthopedic Institute with Long-Term Follow-Up
title_sort open vs percutaneous achilles tendon repair experience of single orthopedic institute with long term follow up
topic Achilles tendon
tendon ruptures
Tenolig<sup>®</sup> repair system
tendon open repair
traumatology
trauma surgery
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/9/1382
work_keys_str_mv AT gaetanocaruso openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT edoardogambuti openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT achillesaracco openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT elisaspadoni openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT elenacorso openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT ilariapinotti openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT alessandropisano openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup
AT leomassari openvspercutaneousachillestendonrepairexperienceofsingleorthopedicinstitutewithlongtermfollowup