National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions

Abstract Community colleges (CCs) are important American higher education institutions; however, stigmas surrounding CCs might impact the perception of CC students as they transition to a four-year institution. To profile researcher perceptions of transfer students and develop a conceptual model of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Connor Brown, Evita Huang, Jose Garcia, Anne M. Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-04-01
Series:Discover Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00470-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850145533441605632
author Connor Brown
Evita Huang
Jose Garcia
Anne M. Brown
author_facet Connor Brown
Evita Huang
Jose Garcia
Anne M. Brown
author_sort Connor Brown
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Community colleges (CCs) are important American higher education institutions; however, stigmas surrounding CCs might impact the perception of CC students as they transition to a four-year institution. To profile researcher perceptions of transfer students and develop a conceptual model of the perception of CC transfer students by biology, chemistry, and physics faculty, a nationwide correspondence test was implemented at 12 United States research 1 institutions. Using recruitment to undergraduate research opportunities as a proxy for the perception of student qualifications, participants (n = 156) were provided profiles of an ostensibly real aspiring undergraduate researcher of either a CC or university transfer student and were asked to evaluate their perception of the profile’s hireability, mentoring, and competency for the given profile. Encouragingly, there was no evidence for overall bias in the perception of university students vs. CC students. However, when controlling for researcher rank, it was found that full professors tended to perceive CC students as both less qualified and less capable (p < 0.001), while associate and assistant professors tend to perceive CC students as less qualified but not less capable. Furthermore, assistant professors, who are typically pre-tenure, perceived the CC profile as less hireable and competent than did associate and full professors (p < 0.05); and assistant professors also perceived the profile of the CC student to be less hireable than the university profile (p < 0.05). In contrast to this, controlling for researcher field (i.e., biology, chemistry, physics; or, more broadly life sciences vs. physical sciences) did not indicate a significant difference. Our results suggest that academic culture may impact the perception of and interactions with CC students as they transition to four-year university science programs at R1 institutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-e380086c77f843d7a849134eb38d474a
institution OA Journals
issn 2731-5525
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Education
spelling doaj-art-e380086c77f843d7a849134eb38d474a2025-08-20T02:28:04ZengSpringerDiscover Education2731-55252025-04-014111310.1007/s44217-025-00470-1National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutionsConnor Brown0Evita Huang1Jose Garcia2Anne M. Brown3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia TechDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia TechDepartment of Food Sciences, Nutrition, Virginia TechDepartment of Biochemistry, Virginia TechAbstract Community colleges (CCs) are important American higher education institutions; however, stigmas surrounding CCs might impact the perception of CC students as they transition to a four-year institution. To profile researcher perceptions of transfer students and develop a conceptual model of the perception of CC transfer students by biology, chemistry, and physics faculty, a nationwide correspondence test was implemented at 12 United States research 1 institutions. Using recruitment to undergraduate research opportunities as a proxy for the perception of student qualifications, participants (n = 156) were provided profiles of an ostensibly real aspiring undergraduate researcher of either a CC or university transfer student and were asked to evaluate their perception of the profile’s hireability, mentoring, and competency for the given profile. Encouragingly, there was no evidence for overall bias in the perception of university students vs. CC students. However, when controlling for researcher rank, it was found that full professors tended to perceive CC students as both less qualified and less capable (p < 0.001), while associate and assistant professors tend to perceive CC students as less qualified but not less capable. Furthermore, assistant professors, who are typically pre-tenure, perceived the CC profile as less hireable and competent than did associate and full professors (p < 0.05); and assistant professors also perceived the profile of the CC student to be less hireable than the university profile (p < 0.05). In contrast to this, controlling for researcher field (i.e., biology, chemistry, physics; or, more broadly life sciences vs. physical sciences) did not indicate a significant difference. Our results suggest that academic culture may impact the perception of and interactions with CC students as they transition to four-year university science programs at R1 institutions.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00470-1Community college transfer studentsUndergraduate research opportunitiesFaculty perception of community collegesFaculty-student perceptions
spellingShingle Connor Brown
Evita Huang
Jose Garcia
Anne M. Brown
National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
Discover Education
Community college transfer students
Undergraduate research opportunities
Faculty perception of community colleges
Faculty-student perceptions
title National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
title_full National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
title_fullStr National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
title_full_unstemmed National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
title_short National correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
title_sort national correspondence test reveals influence of science faculty rank on the perception of community colleges and students at research 1 institutions
topic Community college transfer students
Undergraduate research opportunities
Faculty perception of community colleges
Faculty-student perceptions
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00470-1
work_keys_str_mv AT connorbrown nationalcorrespondencetestrevealsinfluenceofsciencefacultyrankontheperceptionofcommunitycollegesandstudentsatresearch1institutions
AT evitahuang nationalcorrespondencetestrevealsinfluenceofsciencefacultyrankontheperceptionofcommunitycollegesandstudentsatresearch1institutions
AT josegarcia nationalcorrespondencetestrevealsinfluenceofsciencefacultyrankontheperceptionofcommunitycollegesandstudentsatresearch1institutions
AT annembrown nationalcorrespondencetestrevealsinfluenceofsciencefacultyrankontheperceptionofcommunitycollegesandstudentsatresearch1institutions