Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds

ABSTRACT Host heterogeneity in disease transmission is commonly seen across host‐pathogen systems, and identifying individuals who contribute disproportionately to pathogen transmission (i.e., superspreaders) is key to understanding disease dynamics and managing outbreaks. It is often assumed that s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Prescott, Emile Michels, Barbara Tschirren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850085803282137088
author Katherine Prescott
Emile Michels
Barbara Tschirren
author_facet Katherine Prescott
Emile Michels
Barbara Tschirren
author_sort Katherine Prescott
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Host heterogeneity in disease transmission is commonly seen across host‐pathogen systems, and identifying individuals who contribute disproportionately to pathogen transmission (i.e., superspreaders) is key to understanding disease dynamics and managing outbreaks. It is often assumed that shedding intensity is directly proportional to infection intensity. However, theory predicts that co‐infection might modulate the relationship between infection intensity and shedding, promoting increased onward transmission. Here, we quantify the relative importance of infection intensity and co‐infection on shedding in Heterakis gallinarum, a gastrointestinal helminth of gamebirds, in a population of ring‐necked pheasants during the shooting season of 2023. We found that infection intensity was a poor predictor of shedding intensity. Instead, increased shedding was linked to co‐infections with other endoparasites. Hosts co‐infected with Syngamus trachea, Capillaria spp. and/or Eimeria spp. exhibited higher shedding intensity of H. gallinarum than those infected with H. gallinarum alone. This effect was additive, with each additional co‐infection further increasing H. gallinarum shedding. There were no sex differences in shedding, but male hosts had higher H. gallinarum infection intensities. Our results show that shedding intensity is not simply explained by infection intensity, but rather is the result of complex host–parasite and parasite–parasite interactions. This highlights the importance of considering such interactions in understanding disease emergence and persistence in natural populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-e37948d1eb844801ba5f94ae932ec7a3
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-e37948d1eb844801ba5f94ae932ec7a32025-08-20T02:43:38ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-06-01156n/an/a10.1002/ece3.71483Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of GamebirdsKatherine Prescott0Emile Michels1Barbara Tschirren2Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKABSTRACT Host heterogeneity in disease transmission is commonly seen across host‐pathogen systems, and identifying individuals who contribute disproportionately to pathogen transmission (i.e., superspreaders) is key to understanding disease dynamics and managing outbreaks. It is often assumed that shedding intensity is directly proportional to infection intensity. However, theory predicts that co‐infection might modulate the relationship between infection intensity and shedding, promoting increased onward transmission. Here, we quantify the relative importance of infection intensity and co‐infection on shedding in Heterakis gallinarum, a gastrointestinal helminth of gamebirds, in a population of ring‐necked pheasants during the shooting season of 2023. We found that infection intensity was a poor predictor of shedding intensity. Instead, increased shedding was linked to co‐infections with other endoparasites. Hosts co‐infected with Syngamus trachea, Capillaria spp. and/or Eimeria spp. exhibited higher shedding intensity of H. gallinarum than those infected with H. gallinarum alone. This effect was additive, with each additional co‐infection further increasing H. gallinarum shedding. There were no sex differences in shedding, but male hosts had higher H. gallinarum infection intensities. Our results show that shedding intensity is not simply explained by infection intensity, but rather is the result of complex host–parasite and parasite–parasite interactions. This highlights the importance of considering such interactions in understanding disease emergence and persistence in natural populations.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71483disease ecologyhost–parasite interactionsinfectious disease transmissionsupersheddersvirulence evolutionwildlife disease dynamics
spellingShingle Katherine Prescott
Emile Michels
Barbara Tschirren
Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
Ecology and Evolution
disease ecology
host–parasite interactions
infectious disease transmission
supershedders
virulence evolution
wildlife disease dynamics
title Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
title_full Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
title_fullStr Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
title_full_unstemmed Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
title_short Co‐Infection, but Not Infection Intensity, Increases Shedding in a Gastrointestinal Helminth of Gamebirds
title_sort co infection but not infection intensity increases shedding in a gastrointestinal helminth of gamebirds
topic disease ecology
host–parasite interactions
infectious disease transmission
supershedders
virulence evolution
wildlife disease dynamics
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71483
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineprescott coinfectionbutnotinfectionintensityincreasessheddinginagastrointestinalhelminthofgamebirds
AT emilemichels coinfectionbutnotinfectionintensityincreasessheddinginagastrointestinalhelminthofgamebirds
AT barbaratschirren coinfectionbutnotinfectionintensityincreasessheddinginagastrointestinalhelminthofgamebirds