The problem of H Family Bestiaries

This study reexamines the origins, structure, and influence of the H Family bestiaries, a group of texts long misrepresented in scholarly discourse. Despite over a century of research on medieval bestiaries, the H Family remains poorly understood, shaped more by assumptions than systematic analysis....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ilya Dines
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Universidad de Alicante 2025-04-01
Series:Ítaca
Subjects:
Online Access:https://itaca.ua.es/article/view/28792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850255318784671744
author Ilya Dines
author_facet Ilya Dines
author_sort Ilya Dines
collection DOAJ
description This study reexamines the origins, structure, and influence of the H Family bestiaries, a group of texts long misrepresented in scholarly discourse. Despite over a century of research on medieval bestiaries, the H Family remains poorly understood, shaped more by assumptions than systematic analysis. Persistent misconceptions, uncritically repeated in academic literature, have obscured its significance. This paper challenges these assumptions and introduces new evidence that reshapes the understanding of this textual tradition. The study makes three key contributions. First, it revises the dating of the H Family prototype, demonstrating that it was likely produced nearly a century earlier than previously thought, between 1107 and 1120 in France. This finding establishes the H Family as the second major bestiary tradition in Europe after the BIs Family, underscoring its role in the early transmission of bestiary knowledge.Second, it dispels the assumption that Dicta Chrysostomi existed outside the bestiary tradition. This study demonstrates that Dicta, alongside the BIs Family, played a pivotal role in shaping the H Family. Third, it overturns the belief that the near absence of bird chapters in H Family texts resulted from their frequent binding with Aviaries, suggesting a shared origin. Instead, this study establishes that the association was incidental and had no impact on the text itself. Additionally, this study resolves longstanding uncertainties regarding the relationship between the H Family and H-type BIs manuscripts, as well as the presence of dog and wolf chapters in certain BIs texts. It also reexamines textual overlaps between the H Family and the so-called Hofer Bestiary. Additionally, this study identifies several previously unknown Physiologus, BIs, and H Family bestiaries. It also reevaluates the H Family’s influence on later bestiary traditions, particularly its borrowing into one Third Family manuscript.
format Article
id doaj-art-e3646007bd2e4acf8fee35951a65e5e4
institution OA Journals
issn 2172-5500
2386-4753
language Catalan
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Universidad de Alicante
record_format Article
series Ítaca
spelling doaj-art-e3646007bd2e4acf8fee35951a65e5e42025-08-20T01:56:53ZcatUniversidad de AlicanteÍtaca2172-55002386-47532025-04-011672710.14198/itaca.2879237016The problem of H Family BestiariesIlya Dines0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1867-9184The Lazarus Project, University of RochesterThis study reexamines the origins, structure, and influence of the H Family bestiaries, a group of texts long misrepresented in scholarly discourse. Despite over a century of research on medieval bestiaries, the H Family remains poorly understood, shaped more by assumptions than systematic analysis. Persistent misconceptions, uncritically repeated in academic literature, have obscured its significance. This paper challenges these assumptions and introduces new evidence that reshapes the understanding of this textual tradition. The study makes three key contributions. First, it revises the dating of the H Family prototype, demonstrating that it was likely produced nearly a century earlier than previously thought, between 1107 and 1120 in France. This finding establishes the H Family as the second major bestiary tradition in Europe after the BIs Family, underscoring its role in the early transmission of bestiary knowledge.Second, it dispels the assumption that Dicta Chrysostomi existed outside the bestiary tradition. This study demonstrates that Dicta, alongside the BIs Family, played a pivotal role in shaping the H Family. Third, it overturns the belief that the near absence of bird chapters in H Family texts resulted from their frequent binding with Aviaries, suggesting a shared origin. Instead, this study establishes that the association was incidental and had no impact on the text itself. Additionally, this study resolves longstanding uncertainties regarding the relationship between the H Family and H-type BIs manuscripts, as well as the presence of dog and wolf chapters in certain BIs texts. It also reexamines textual overlaps between the H Family and the so-called Hofer Bestiary. Additionally, this study identifies several previously unknown Physiologus, BIs, and H Family bestiaries. It also reevaluates the H Family’s influence on later bestiary traditions, particularly its borrowing into one Third Family manuscript.https://itaca.ua.es/article/view/28792bis bestiariesdicta chrysostomih family bestiariesh-type bis bestiariesmedieval bestiary transmissionmedieval bestiaries
spellingShingle Ilya Dines
The problem of H Family Bestiaries
Ítaca
bis bestiaries
dicta chrysostomi
h family bestiaries
h-type bis bestiaries
medieval bestiary transmission
medieval bestiaries
title The problem of H Family Bestiaries
title_full The problem of H Family Bestiaries
title_fullStr The problem of H Family Bestiaries
title_full_unstemmed The problem of H Family Bestiaries
title_short The problem of H Family Bestiaries
title_sort problem of h family bestiaries
topic bis bestiaries
dicta chrysostomi
h family bestiaries
h-type bis bestiaries
medieval bestiary transmission
medieval bestiaries
url https://itaca.ua.es/article/view/28792
work_keys_str_mv AT ilyadines theproblemofhfamilybestiaries
AT ilyadines problemofhfamilybestiaries