A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis

The growing adoption of renewable energy, particularly photovoltaic (PV) solar systems, has led to the development of numerous simulation software tools to simplify system design, analysis, and optimization. This study evaluates five widely used PV simulation software packages—SAM, PVsyst, HOMER, PV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. Ashraful Islam, M.M. Naushad Ali, Ian B. Benitez, Sidahmed Sidi Habib, Taskin Jamal, Aymen Flah, Vojtech Blazek, Claude Ziad El-Bayeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Energy Strategy Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849770590978703360
author Md. Ashraful Islam
M.M. Naushad Ali
Ian B. Benitez
Sidahmed Sidi Habib
Taskin Jamal
Aymen Flah
Vojtech Blazek
Claude Ziad El-Bayeh
author_facet Md. Ashraful Islam
M.M. Naushad Ali
Ian B. Benitez
Sidahmed Sidi Habib
Taskin Jamal
Aymen Flah
Vojtech Blazek
Claude Ziad El-Bayeh
author_sort Md. Ashraful Islam
collection DOAJ
description The growing adoption of renewable energy, particularly photovoltaic (PV) solar systems, has led to the development of numerous simulation software tools to simplify system design, analysis, and optimization. This study evaluates five widely used PV simulation software packages—SAM, PVsyst, HOMER, PV∗SOL, and RETScreen—by analyzing their features and performance across ten critical criteria, including cost, solar database accessibility, modeling capabilities, and ease of use. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the criteria are ranked by importance, with the working platform identified as the most influential factor in software selection, followed by economic modeling capabilities and software cost. Additionally, the flexibility of simulation data requirements, reporting and analysis options, and user friendliness and ease of use are identified as important criteria, albeit ranking lower in importance. Performance analysis using simulation and real data further validates the evaluation process, providing insights into the accuracy and reliability of the simulation results generated by each software. Our findings indicate that SAM delivers superior accuracy when compared to real-world data, making it the most reliable tool for PV system analysis. PV∗SOL also ranks highly for its robust reporting and modeling capabilities. These results provide valuable insights for professionals and researchers in selecting the most suitable software for PV system design and optimization, emphasizing the balance between functionality, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendliness.
format Article
id doaj-art-e363f309bd0c4d6abfc246adfaa5fbaf
institution DOAJ
issn 2211-467X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Strategy Reviews
spelling doaj-art-e363f309bd0c4d6abfc246adfaa5fbaf2025-08-20T03:02:56ZengElsevierEnergy Strategy Reviews2211-467X2025-03-015810166310.1016/j.esr.2025.101663A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysisMd. Ashraful Islam0M.M. Naushad Ali1Ian B. Benitez2Sidahmed Sidi Habib3Taskin Jamal4Aymen Flah5Vojtech Blazek6Claude Ziad El-Bayeh7Department of EEE, Green University of Bangladesh, BangladeshDepartment of EEE, Green University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Corresponding author.Electrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, FEU Institute of Technology, Manila City, PhilippinesDepartment of Mechanical System Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0862, JapanDepartment of EEE, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, BangladeshEnergy Processes Environment and Electrical Systems Unit, National Engineering School of Gabès, University of Gabès, Gabès 6029, Tunisia; Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India; College of Engineering, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, 21448, Saudi Arabia; Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, 11931, JordanENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech RepublicCollege of Engineering and Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, QatarThe growing adoption of renewable energy, particularly photovoltaic (PV) solar systems, has led to the development of numerous simulation software tools to simplify system design, analysis, and optimization. This study evaluates five widely used PV simulation software packages—SAM, PVsyst, HOMER, PV∗SOL, and RETScreen—by analyzing their features and performance across ten critical criteria, including cost, solar database accessibility, modeling capabilities, and ease of use. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the criteria are ranked by importance, with the working platform identified as the most influential factor in software selection, followed by economic modeling capabilities and software cost. Additionally, the flexibility of simulation data requirements, reporting and analysis options, and user friendliness and ease of use are identified as important criteria, albeit ranking lower in importance. Performance analysis using simulation and real data further validates the evaluation process, providing insights into the accuracy and reliability of the simulation results generated by each software. Our findings indicate that SAM delivers superior accuracy when compared to real-world data, making it the most reliable tool for PV system analysis. PV∗SOL also ranks highly for its robust reporting and modeling capabilities. These results provide valuable insights for professionals and researchers in selecting the most suitable software for PV system design and optimization, emphasizing the balance between functionality, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendliness.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000264Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)PV simulation softwareRenewable energySoftware evaluationDecision making
spellingShingle Md. Ashraful Islam
M.M. Naushad Ali
Ian B. Benitez
Sidahmed Sidi Habib
Taskin Jamal
Aymen Flah
Vojtech Blazek
Claude Ziad El-Bayeh
A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
Energy Strategy Reviews
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
PV simulation software
Renewable energy
Software evaluation
Decision making
title A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
title_full A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
title_fullStr A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
title_short A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software a decision making approach using analytic hierarchy process and performance analysis
topic Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
PV simulation software
Renewable energy
Software evaluation
Decision making
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000264
work_keys_str_mv AT mdashrafulislam acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT mmnaushadali acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT ianbbenitez acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT sidahmedsidihabib acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT taskinjamal acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT aymenflah acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT vojtechblazek acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT claudeziadelbayeh acomprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT mdashrafulislam comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT mmnaushadali comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT ianbbenitez comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT sidahmedsidihabib comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT taskinjamal comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT aymenflah comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT vojtechblazek comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis
AT claudeziadelbayeh comprehensiveevaluationofphotovoltaicsimulationsoftwareadecisionmakingapproachusinganalytichierarchyprocessandperformanceanalysis