Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective
Abstract Background Single-sided deafness is characterized as one ear with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss or dead and normal or near-normal hearing in the other ear. Individuals with single-sided deafness face difficulty communicating effectively in their day-to-day lives. There are s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00855-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849767097324797952 |
|---|---|
| author | Lokanath Sahoo Rahul Kurkure Vivek Kumar Singh Nitu Singh Kiran Upadhyay Krushnendu Sundar Sahoo |
| author_facet | Lokanath Sahoo Rahul Kurkure Vivek Kumar Singh Nitu Singh Kiran Upadhyay Krushnendu Sundar Sahoo |
| author_sort | Lokanath Sahoo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Single-sided deafness is characterized as one ear with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss or dead and normal or near-normal hearing in the other ear. Individuals with single-sided deafness face difficulty communicating effectively in their day-to-day lives. There are several management options available for such a group of patients, which include cochlear implantation, contralateral routing of signal devices, and surgical and non-surgical bone conduction hearing solutions. However, a unanimous management option is still to be established. Aims and objectives This study aims to explore the clinical aspects, assessment, and management of single-sided deafness; secondly, to understand the patients’ perspective and selection of management options; and thirdly, to assess the effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal devices compared to other available management options. Material and methods All the study participants who have reported and been clinically diagnosed as a case of single-sided deafness with more than 10 years of history of hearing loss were included in the study. They were evaluated by implementing an audiological test battery, which included pure tone audiometry, impedance audiometry, and otoacoustic emission. After the confirmation of hearing loss, they were asked to fill out the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly screening questionnaire, followed by trial and counseling regarding available management options. The management option was decided based upon the clinical scenario and patient feedback. Then those who chose contralateral routing of the signal device were asked to fill out the quality-of-life questionnaire both prior to fitting and after 30 days of use of the device. Results A total of 48 patients participated in the study. 95.8% of subjects have opted for contralateral routing of signal devices. The participant’s judgment and basis of selection of the device were described. The outcomes of various management options were measured, and the crucial factors intricate to the decision making are discussed. Conclusion The study focuses on the comprehensive exploration of treatment options available for individuals with long-standing single-sided deafness. It emphasized understanding the patient’s perspective about their problem and intricate the thought process behind the decision-making regarding the management option. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e356c1a38f4f4be2b16db868355a04b8 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2090-8539 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology |
| spelling | doaj-art-e356c1a38f4f4be2b16db868355a04b82025-08-20T03:04:21ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology2090-85392025-07-0141111410.1186/s43163-025-00855-xEffectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspectiveLokanath Sahoo0Rahul Kurkure1Vivek Kumar Singh2Nitu Singh3Kiran Upadhyay4Krushnendu Sundar Sahoo5Southern Command HospitalSouthern Command HospitalSouthern Command HospitalSouthern Command HospitalSouthern Command HospitalRehabscape Health Care Pvt LtdAbstract Background Single-sided deafness is characterized as one ear with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss or dead and normal or near-normal hearing in the other ear. Individuals with single-sided deafness face difficulty communicating effectively in their day-to-day lives. There are several management options available for such a group of patients, which include cochlear implantation, contralateral routing of signal devices, and surgical and non-surgical bone conduction hearing solutions. However, a unanimous management option is still to be established. Aims and objectives This study aims to explore the clinical aspects, assessment, and management of single-sided deafness; secondly, to understand the patients’ perspective and selection of management options; and thirdly, to assess the effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal devices compared to other available management options. Material and methods All the study participants who have reported and been clinically diagnosed as a case of single-sided deafness with more than 10 years of history of hearing loss were included in the study. They were evaluated by implementing an audiological test battery, which included pure tone audiometry, impedance audiometry, and otoacoustic emission. After the confirmation of hearing loss, they were asked to fill out the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly screening questionnaire, followed by trial and counseling regarding available management options. The management option was decided based upon the clinical scenario and patient feedback. Then those who chose contralateral routing of the signal device were asked to fill out the quality-of-life questionnaire both prior to fitting and after 30 days of use of the device. Results A total of 48 patients participated in the study. 95.8% of subjects have opted for contralateral routing of signal devices. The participant’s judgment and basis of selection of the device were described. The outcomes of various management options were measured, and the crucial factors intricate to the decision making are discussed. Conclusion The study focuses on the comprehensive exploration of treatment options available for individuals with long-standing single-sided deafness. It emphasized understanding the patient’s perspective about their problem and intricate the thought process behind the decision-making regarding the management option.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00855-xContralateral routing of signal deviceActive piezoelectric bone conduction implantCochlear ImplantNon-surgical bone conduction hearing deviceSingle-sided deafnessSignal-to-noise ratio |
| spellingShingle | Lokanath Sahoo Rahul Kurkure Vivek Kumar Singh Nitu Singh Kiran Upadhyay Krushnendu Sundar Sahoo Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology Contralateral routing of signal device Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant Cochlear Implant Non-surgical bone conduction hearing device Single-sided deafness Signal-to-noise ratio |
| title | Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective |
| title_full | Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective |
| title_fullStr | Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective |
| title_short | Effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long-standing single-sided deafness: a patient’s perspective |
| title_sort | effectiveness of contralateral routing of signal device versus other available management options in long standing single sided deafness a patient s perspective |
| topic | Contralateral routing of signal device Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant Cochlear Implant Non-surgical bone conduction hearing device Single-sided deafness Signal-to-noise ratio |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00855-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lokanathsahoo effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective AT rahulkurkure effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective AT vivekkumarsingh effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective AT nitusingh effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective AT kiranupadhyay effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective AT krushnendusundarsahoo effectivenessofcontralateralroutingofsignaldeviceversusotheravailablemanagementoptionsinlongstandingsinglesideddeafnessapatientsperspective |