A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records

Objective. Between one-third and half of all radiology examinations worldwide are probably chest studies. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical influence of chest radiography. Methods. In a tertiary referral hospital, 939 consecutive daytime chest radiography exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mats Geijer, Liz Ivarsson, Jan H. Göthlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Radiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/862198
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849434775149871104
author Mats Geijer
Liz Ivarsson
Jan H. Göthlin
author_facet Mats Geijer
Liz Ivarsson
Jan H. Göthlin
author_sort Mats Geijer
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Between one-third and half of all radiology examinations worldwide are probably chest studies. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical influence of chest radiography. Methods. In a tertiary referral hospital, 939 consecutive daytime chest radiography examinations were evaluated. The outcome was classified as normal, incidental, or pathologic. The referring physician’s reaction to radiologic outcome was classified as highly expected, moderately expected, or unexpected. The influence on the patients' treatment was divided into four groups from major to no influence. Results. In all, 71.6% of the studies had a highly expected outcome. Moderately expected or unexpected outcomes were noted in 36.6% of 500 pathologic examinations. Unexpected outcome was noted in 11.6% of all studies. The radiologic outcome influenced treatment in 65.4% of patients where pathology was demonstrated. Patients with normal or incidental findings had treatment influenced in 1/3 of the cases. Unexpected findings influenced treatment more than moderately expected findings. When radiological findings were highly expected, treatment was influenced in less than half of the cases. Surprisingly few chest radiology examinations were commented upon in the medical records.
format Article
id doaj-art-e355eb6ed81f4f348089c43eff70ff5c
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1941
2090-195X
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Radiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-e355eb6ed81f4f348089c43eff70ff5c2025-08-20T03:26:30ZengWileyRadiology Research and Practice2090-19412090-195X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/862198862198A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical RecordsMats Geijer0Liz Ivarsson1Jan H. Göthlin2Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, SwedenDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, SwedenObjective. Between one-third and half of all radiology examinations worldwide are probably chest studies. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical influence of chest radiography. Methods. In a tertiary referral hospital, 939 consecutive daytime chest radiography examinations were evaluated. The outcome was classified as normal, incidental, or pathologic. The referring physician’s reaction to radiologic outcome was classified as highly expected, moderately expected, or unexpected. The influence on the patients' treatment was divided into four groups from major to no influence. Results. In all, 71.6% of the studies had a highly expected outcome. Moderately expected or unexpected outcomes were noted in 36.6% of 500 pathologic examinations. Unexpected outcome was noted in 11.6% of all studies. The radiologic outcome influenced treatment in 65.4% of patients where pathology was demonstrated. Patients with normal or incidental findings had treatment influenced in 1/3 of the cases. Unexpected findings influenced treatment more than moderately expected findings. When radiological findings were highly expected, treatment was influenced in less than half of the cases. Surprisingly few chest radiology examinations were commented upon in the medical records.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/862198
spellingShingle Mats Geijer
Liz Ivarsson
Jan H. Göthlin
A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
Radiology Research and Practice
title A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
title_full A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
title_fullStr A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
title_short A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Impact of 939 Chest Radiographs Using the Medical Records
title_sort retrospective analysis of the clinical impact of 939 chest radiographs using the medical records
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/862198
work_keys_str_mv AT matsgeijer aretrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords
AT lizivarsson aretrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords
AT janhgothlin aretrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords
AT matsgeijer retrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords
AT lizivarsson retrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords
AT janhgothlin retrospectiveanalysisoftheclinicalimpactof939chestradiographsusingthemedicalrecords