Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt
Understanding the causes of spatiotemporal variation in crop yields across large areas is important in closing yield gaps and producing more food for the growing global population. While there has been much focus on using data-driven models to predict crop yield, there is also an opportunity to use...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Agriculture |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2318 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850049730748350464 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrick Filippi Brett M. Whelan Thomas F. A. Bishop |
| author_facet | Patrick Filippi Brett M. Whelan Thomas F. A. Bishop |
| author_sort | Patrick Filippi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Understanding the causes of spatiotemporal variation in crop yields across large areas is important in closing yield gaps and producing more food for the growing global population. While there has been much focus on using data-driven models to predict crop yield, there is also an opportunity to use these empirical models to understand which factors are driving variations in yield and to quantify their contributions. This study uses a large database of 625 rainfed wheat yield maps from 14 different seasons (2007–2020) across the eastern grain belt of Australia. XGBoost models were used, with predictors including maps of soil attributes (e.g., pH and sodicity), along with weather indices (rainfall, frost, heat, growing degree days). The model and predictors could accurately predict field-scale yield, with a Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) of 0.78 with 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), a form of interpretive machine learning (IML), values were then used to assess the impact of the variables on yield. The SHAP values for each predictor were also mapped onto a grid of the study area for the 2020 season, which showed the impact of each predictor on wheat yield (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and revenue (AUD ($) ha<sup>−1</sup>) in interpretable units. Weather variables, such as rainfall and heat events, had the largest impact on yield. Although generally less significant, soil constraints such as soil sodicity were still important in driving yield. The results also showed that despite their largely temporally stable nature, soil constraints impact yield differently, depending on seasonal conditions. Overall, data-driven models and IML proved valuable in understanding the impact of important weather and soil variables on wheat yield and revenue across the eastern Australian grain belt. This could be used to determine the magnitude and economic impact of soil constraints and extreme weather on crops across regions and to inform policies and farm management decisions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e34079d1534b4fe681b99a5dbec6574a |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2077-0472 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agriculture |
| spelling | doaj-art-e34079d1534b4fe681b99a5dbec6574a2025-08-20T02:53:39ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722024-12-011412231810.3390/agriculture14122318Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain BeltPatrick Filippi0Brett M. Whelan1Thomas F. A. Bishop2Precision Agriculture Laboratory, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaPrecision Agriculture Laboratory, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaPrecision Agriculture Laboratory, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaUnderstanding the causes of spatiotemporal variation in crop yields across large areas is important in closing yield gaps and producing more food for the growing global population. While there has been much focus on using data-driven models to predict crop yield, there is also an opportunity to use these empirical models to understand which factors are driving variations in yield and to quantify their contributions. This study uses a large database of 625 rainfed wheat yield maps from 14 different seasons (2007–2020) across the eastern grain belt of Australia. XGBoost models were used, with predictors including maps of soil attributes (e.g., pH and sodicity), along with weather indices (rainfall, frost, heat, growing degree days). The model and predictors could accurately predict field-scale yield, with a Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) of 0.78 with 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), a form of interpretive machine learning (IML), values were then used to assess the impact of the variables on yield. The SHAP values for each predictor were also mapped onto a grid of the study area for the 2020 season, which showed the impact of each predictor on wheat yield (t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and revenue (AUD ($) ha<sup>−1</sup>) in interpretable units. Weather variables, such as rainfall and heat events, had the largest impact on yield. Although generally less significant, soil constraints such as soil sodicity were still important in driving yield. The results also showed that despite their largely temporally stable nature, soil constraints impact yield differently, depending on seasonal conditions. Overall, data-driven models and IML proved valuable in understanding the impact of important weather and soil variables on wheat yield and revenue across the eastern Australian grain belt. This could be used to determine the magnitude and economic impact of soil constraints and extreme weather on crops across regions and to inform policies and farm management decisions.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2318yield modellingempiricalXAIexplainable AIsoil constraintsfrost |
| spellingShingle | Patrick Filippi Brett M. Whelan Thomas F. A. Bishop Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt Agriculture yield modelling empirical XAI explainable AI soil constraints frost |
| title | Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt |
| title_full | Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt |
| title_fullStr | Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt |
| title_full_unstemmed | Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt |
| title_short | Explainable Machine Learning to Map the Impact of Weather and Soil on Wheat Yield and Revenue Across the Eastern Australian Grain Belt |
| title_sort | explainable machine learning to map the impact of weather and soil on wheat yield and revenue across the eastern australian grain belt |
| topic | yield modelling empirical XAI explainable AI soil constraints frost |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2318 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patrickfilippi explainablemachinelearningtomaptheimpactofweatherandsoilonwheatyieldandrevenueacrosstheeasternaustraliangrainbelt AT brettmwhelan explainablemachinelearningtomaptheimpactofweatherandsoilonwheatyieldandrevenueacrosstheeasternaustraliangrainbelt AT thomasfabishop explainablemachinelearningtomaptheimpactofweatherandsoilonwheatyieldandrevenueacrosstheeasternaustraliangrainbelt |