Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018

The national calibration of Eurocode load model 1 (LM1) for road bridges was made by a calibration of the load effects of LM1 against the corresponding load effects of a former load model used in Finland. Due to the increased gross vehicle weights in legislation, a national calibration of LM1 was ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olli Asp, Anssi Laaksonen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Riga Technical University Press 2023-09-01
Series:The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7888
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846092309488205824
author Olli Asp
Anssi Laaksonen
author_facet Olli Asp
Anssi Laaksonen
author_sort Olli Asp
collection DOAJ
description The national calibration of Eurocode load model 1 (LM1) for road bridges was made by a calibration of the load effects of LM1 against the corresponding load effects of a former load model used in Finland. Due to the increased gross vehicle weights in legislation, a national calibration of LM1 was necessary and the stochastic simulation was needed. The aim of this study is to generate a traffic model together with a predictive model for simulation purposes by using and combining long-time monitoring data measured on a road network in different surveys. In this paper, the performance of the predictive model of increases in axle loads and gross vehicle weights is evaluated against short-term bridge weight in motion (BWIM) measurements. The results achieved with a simulation can be used to gain more information of statistical parameters and the evolution of load effects caused on bridges by road traffic in Finland. The simulation model presented in this study served as a basis for updated national calibration of load model LM1. The follow-up comparison between predictive model and traffic monitoring shows the suitability of the estimation of the evolution of traffic loads and also necessity of the raise of LM1.
format Article
id doaj-art-e322e0f7e57f456fa436c5a0767b0fce
institution Kabale University
issn 1822-427X
1822-4288
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Riga Technical University Press
record_format Article
series The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
spelling doaj-art-e322e0f7e57f456fa436c5a0767b0fce2025-01-02T21:09:36ZengRiga Technical University PressThe Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering1822-427X1822-42882023-09-0118313916810.7250/bjrbe.2023-18.6123372Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018Olli Asp0Anssi Laaksonen1Faculty of Built Environment, Concrete and Bridge Structures, Tampere University, Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Built Environment, Concrete and Bridge Structures, Tampere University, Tampere, FinlandThe national calibration of Eurocode load model 1 (LM1) for road bridges was made by a calibration of the load effects of LM1 against the corresponding load effects of a former load model used in Finland. Due to the increased gross vehicle weights in legislation, a national calibration of LM1 was necessary and the stochastic simulation was needed. The aim of this study is to generate a traffic model together with a predictive model for simulation purposes by using and combining long-time monitoring data measured on a road network in different surveys. In this paper, the performance of the predictive model of increases in axle loads and gross vehicle weights is evaluated against short-term bridge weight in motion (BWIM) measurements. The results achieved with a simulation can be used to gain more information of statistical parameters and the evolution of load effects caused on bridges by road traffic in Finland. The simulation model presented in this study served as a basis for updated national calibration of load model LM1. The follow-up comparison between predictive model and traffic monitoring shows the suitability of the estimation of the evolution of traffic loads and also necessity of the raise of LM1.https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7888bridgetraffic loadsweight-in-motionstatisticsload modelsimulation
spellingShingle Olli Asp
Anssi Laaksonen
Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
bridge
traffic loads
weight-in-motion
statistics
load model
simulation
title Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
title_full Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
title_fullStr Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
title_full_unstemmed Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
title_short Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018
title_sort traffic load model calibration and comparison to evolving traffic loads in 2014 2018
topic bridge
traffic loads
weight-in-motion
statistics
load model
simulation
url https://bjrbe-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/7888
work_keys_str_mv AT olliasp trafficloadmodelcalibrationandcomparisontoevolvingtrafficloadsin20142018
AT anssilaaksonen trafficloadmodelcalibrationandcomparisontoevolvingtrafficloadsin20142018