Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study

Psycholinguistic research on gender-inclusive language has mainly focused on the processing of stereotyped nouns, while other work has centered on the processing of gender-inclusive morphemes (GIMs). This study focuses on Spanish and, by means of an eye-tracking technique, it examines the early and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra Román Irizarry, Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2025-06-01
Series:Social Psychological Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13611
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850027403624054784
author Alexandra Román Irizarry
Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo
author_facet Alexandra Román Irizarry
Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo
author_sort Alexandra Román Irizarry
collection DOAJ
description Psycholinguistic research on gender-inclusive language has mainly focused on the processing of stereotyped nouns, while other work has centered on the processing of gender-inclusive morphemes (GIMs). This study focuses on Spanish and, by means of an eye-tracking technique, it examines the early and late processing of pronouns ending with the gender-inclusive morpheme –x, in comparison to those ending with the canonical masculine morpheme –o and the feminine morpheme –a. It also considers emerging trends between –x and extralinguistic factors, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, experience with gender studies, and attitudes towards GIMs. Spanish-speaking university students in Puerto Rico completed a sentence reading task and a questionnaire that collected information pertaining to four extralinguistic factors. Linear mixed-effects models display that processing –x is more costly than –o in all early and late reading measures, but more costly than –a only in some early and late reading measures. Furthermore, the random-effects structure showed an inverse relationship between these differences: the smaller the difference between –x and –o, the larger the difference between –a and –x. Emerging trends with extralinguistic factors suggest future studies should further explore their relationship with gender-inclusive morpheme –x. For a holistic understanding of gender-inclusive Spanish processing at the intersection of language and gender, these findings evince the importance of examining GIMs in comparison to both canonical morphemes and measuring both early and late processing.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2f523cbd48f454f9212fc3c58168e62
institution DOAJ
issn 2569-653X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Social Psychological Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-e2f523cbd48f454f9212fc3c58168e622025-08-20T03:00:11ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologySocial Psychological Bulletin2569-653X2025-06-012010.32872/spb.13611spb.13611Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking StudyAlexandra Román Irizarry0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-7515Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3074-8680Department of Hispanic Studies, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, Puerto RicoDepartment of Hispanic Studies, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, Puerto RicoPsycholinguistic research on gender-inclusive language has mainly focused on the processing of stereotyped nouns, while other work has centered on the processing of gender-inclusive morphemes (GIMs). This study focuses on Spanish and, by means of an eye-tracking technique, it examines the early and late processing of pronouns ending with the gender-inclusive morpheme –x, in comparison to those ending with the canonical masculine morpheme –o and the feminine morpheme –a. It also considers emerging trends between –x and extralinguistic factors, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, experience with gender studies, and attitudes towards GIMs. Spanish-speaking university students in Puerto Rico completed a sentence reading task and a questionnaire that collected information pertaining to four extralinguistic factors. Linear mixed-effects models display that processing –x is more costly than –o in all early and late reading measures, but more costly than –a only in some early and late reading measures. Furthermore, the random-effects structure showed an inverse relationship between these differences: the smaller the difference between –x and –o, the larger the difference between –a and –x. Emerging trends with extralinguistic factors suggest future studies should further explore their relationship with gender-inclusive morpheme –x. For a holistic understanding of gender-inclusive Spanish processing at the intersection of language and gender, these findings evince the importance of examining GIMs in comparison to both canonical morphemes and measuring both early and late processing.https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13611gender-inclusive languagegender-inclusive morphemeseye trackingsentence processingextralinguistic factorsspanish
spellingShingle Alexandra Román Irizarry
Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo
Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
Social Psychological Bulletin
gender-inclusive language
gender-inclusive morphemes
eye tracking
sentence processing
extralinguistic factors
spanish
title Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_full Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_fullStr Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_full_unstemmed Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_short Processing of Pronouns With Gender-Inclusive –x in Spanish: An Eye-Tracking Study
title_sort processing of pronouns with gender inclusive x in spanish an eye tracking study
topic gender-inclusive language
gender-inclusive morphemes
eye tracking
sentence processing
extralinguistic factors
spanish
url https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13611
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandraromanirizarry processingofpronounswithgenderinclusivexinspanishaneyetrackingstudy
AT rosaeguzzardotamargo processingofpronounswithgenderinclusivexinspanishaneyetrackingstudy