A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage

Freshwater forested wetlands account for ~76% (918 M ha) of the total global wetland extent. However, freshwater forested wetlands are difficult to distinguish from upland forest due to canopy coverage, the abundance of wetland-nonwetland mosaics, seasonal hydropatterns, and fewer readily observable...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yadav Sapkota, Jacob F. Berkowitz, Camille L. Stagg, Ryan R. Busby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1528440/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850265975362945024
author Yadav Sapkota
Jacob F. Berkowitz
Camille L. Stagg
Ryan R. Busby
author_facet Yadav Sapkota
Jacob F. Berkowitz
Camille L. Stagg
Ryan R. Busby
author_sort Yadav Sapkota
collection DOAJ
description Freshwater forested wetlands account for ~76% (918 M ha) of the total global wetland extent. However, freshwater forested wetlands are difficult to distinguish from upland forest due to canopy coverage, the abundance of wetland-nonwetland mosaics, seasonal hydropatterns, and fewer readily observable connections to large surface water bodies relative to marshes and other emergent habitats. Therefore, freshwater forested wetland ecosystems are often misclassified as upland forests in carbon accounting models, underestimating soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. This study highlights freshwater forested wetland SOC accounting challenges and presents SOC densities/stocks from a global literature synthesis across different freshwater forested wetland types. We reviewed 374 forested wetland articles, compiling and calculating carbon densities by depth from 90 freshwater forested wetland studies to construct a database of 334 study sites including nine countries. The median (± median absolute deviation) SOC stock was 91.2 ± 46.4 Mg C ha−1 and 235.3 ± 125.6 Mg C ha−1 in the top 30 cm and 100 cm of soil, respectively. The tidal freshwater forested wetland had highest SOC stock (341.6 ± 98.4 Mg C ha−1) in the upper 100 cm soil profile followed by rainforest (285.6 ± 75.8 Mg C ha−1), non-tidal swamps (229.3 ± 120.4 Mg C ha−1), and floodplain forested wetlands (176.6 ± 84 Mg C ha−1). Within the conterminous United States forest type groups, the Tsuga/Picea group had the highest median SOC stocks (353.6 ± 82.9 Mg ha−1) in the top 100 cm of soil followed by Quercus/Pinus (246.6 ± 82.3 Mg ha−1) and Quercus/Liquidambar/Taxodium (207.9 ± 87.7 Mg ha−1) groups, likely driven by variability in litter degradability, wetland hydroperiod, geomorphic positions, and regional climatic factors. This literature synthesis highlights SOC accounting in freshwater forested wetland carbon pools when estimating carbon stocks and fluxes. Results can be used to improve carbon modeling outcomes, as well as inform regional, national, and global management of wetland carbon resources.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2e8b192b8b6426795090326f3f0c817
institution OA Journals
issn 2624-893X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
spelling doaj-art-e2e8b192b8b6426795090326f3f0c8172025-08-20T01:54:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change2624-893X2025-04-01810.3389/ffgc.2025.15284401528440A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storageYadav Sapkota0Jacob F. Berkowitz1Camille L. Stagg2Ryan R. Busby3Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, United StatesEnvironmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, United StatesU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA, United StatesConstruction Engineering Research Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign, IL, United StatesFreshwater forested wetlands account for ~76% (918 M ha) of the total global wetland extent. However, freshwater forested wetlands are difficult to distinguish from upland forest due to canopy coverage, the abundance of wetland-nonwetland mosaics, seasonal hydropatterns, and fewer readily observable connections to large surface water bodies relative to marshes and other emergent habitats. Therefore, freshwater forested wetland ecosystems are often misclassified as upland forests in carbon accounting models, underestimating soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. This study highlights freshwater forested wetland SOC accounting challenges and presents SOC densities/stocks from a global literature synthesis across different freshwater forested wetland types. We reviewed 374 forested wetland articles, compiling and calculating carbon densities by depth from 90 freshwater forested wetland studies to construct a database of 334 study sites including nine countries. The median (± median absolute deviation) SOC stock was 91.2 ± 46.4 Mg C ha−1 and 235.3 ± 125.6 Mg C ha−1 in the top 30 cm and 100 cm of soil, respectively. The tidal freshwater forested wetland had highest SOC stock (341.6 ± 98.4 Mg C ha−1) in the upper 100 cm soil profile followed by rainforest (285.6 ± 75.8 Mg C ha−1), non-tidal swamps (229.3 ± 120.4 Mg C ha−1), and floodplain forested wetlands (176.6 ± 84 Mg C ha−1). Within the conterminous United States forest type groups, the Tsuga/Picea group had the highest median SOC stocks (353.6 ± 82.9 Mg ha−1) in the top 100 cm of soil followed by Quercus/Pinus (246.6 ± 82.3 Mg ha−1) and Quercus/Liquidambar/Taxodium (207.9 ± 87.7 Mg ha−1) groups, likely driven by variability in litter degradability, wetland hydroperiod, geomorphic positions, and regional climatic factors. This literature synthesis highlights SOC accounting in freshwater forested wetland carbon pools when estimating carbon stocks and fluxes. Results can be used to improve carbon modeling outcomes, as well as inform regional, national, and global management of wetland carbon resources.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1528440/fullcarbon stockcarbon accountingwetland soilcarbon cyclinggeomorphic settingsforest type groups
spellingShingle Yadav Sapkota
Jacob F. Berkowitz
Camille L. Stagg
Ryan R. Busby
A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
carbon stock
carbon accounting
wetland soil
carbon cycling
geomorphic settings
forest type groups
title A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
title_full A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
title_fullStr A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
title_full_unstemmed A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
title_short A synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
title_sort synthesis of freshwater forested wetland soil organic carbon storage
topic carbon stock
carbon accounting
wetland soil
carbon cycling
geomorphic settings
forest type groups
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1528440/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavsapkota asynthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT jacobfberkowitz asynthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT camillelstagg asynthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT ryanrbusby asynthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT yadavsapkota synthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT jacobfberkowitz synthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT camillelstagg synthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage
AT ryanrbusby synthesisoffreshwaterforestedwetlandsoilorganiccarbonstorage