Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction
In four studies, participants judged satisfaction with hypothetical salaries, given the salaries of others doing the same work. Unlike previous research, contexts (distributions of others’ salaries) were manipulated within- rather than between-subjects. These studies enabled tests of an extension of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000063/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850178545552195584 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael H. Birnbaum Julien Rouvere |
| author_facet | Michael H. Birnbaum Julien Rouvere |
| author_sort | Michael H. Birnbaum |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In four studies, participants judged satisfaction with hypothetical salaries, given the salaries of others doing the same work. Unlike previous research, contexts (distributions of others’ salaries) were manipulated within- rather than between-subjects. These studies enabled tests of an extension of range–frequency (RF) theory that assumes that judgments are a compromise between RF predictions based on between- and within-trial contexts. This extension to within-subjects designs correctly predicted the cases in which people assign higher satisfaction ratings to lower salaries. The manipulation of the context within-subjects confirmed phenomena previously observed in between-subjects research. However, a violation of this within-subjects RF model was also observed: When one’s salary is lowest compared to others within the same firm, satisfaction varies inversely with the highest salary paid to another at the same firm. Apparently, judgments of satisfaction also depend on inequity. This finding was not observed in previous between-subjects research; indeed, salary and inequity are perfectly confounded for the participant in such a design. We theorize that satisfaction is not merely a judgment of where one’s salary falls relative to other salaries, but also depends on how much one is underpaid relative to the distribution of underpayments. A revision of the within-subjects RF model (incorporating the distribution of inequities) gave a good description of judgments of salary satisfaction and of the likelihood to accept a job offer. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e2e49b0d86124d4a905865f4a28af4fc |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1930-2975 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Judgment and Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj-art-e2e49b0d86124d4a905865f4a28af4fc2025-08-20T02:18:42ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752025-01-012010.1017/jdm.2025.6Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfactionMichael H. Birnbaum0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-2007Julien Rouvere1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9468-564XPsychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAIn four studies, participants judged satisfaction with hypothetical salaries, given the salaries of others doing the same work. Unlike previous research, contexts (distributions of others’ salaries) were manipulated within- rather than between-subjects. These studies enabled tests of an extension of range–frequency (RF) theory that assumes that judgments are a compromise between RF predictions based on between- and within-trial contexts. This extension to within-subjects designs correctly predicted the cases in which people assign higher satisfaction ratings to lower salaries. The manipulation of the context within-subjects confirmed phenomena previously observed in between-subjects research. However, a violation of this within-subjects RF model was also observed: When one’s salary is lowest compared to others within the same firm, satisfaction varies inversely with the highest salary paid to another at the same firm. Apparently, judgments of satisfaction also depend on inequity. This finding was not observed in previous between-subjects research; indeed, salary and inequity are perfectly confounded for the participant in such a design. We theorize that satisfaction is not merely a judgment of where one’s salary falls relative to other salaries, but also depends on how much one is underpaid relative to the distribution of underpayments. A revision of the within-subjects RF model (incorporating the distribution of inequities) gave a good description of judgments of salary satisfaction and of the likelihood to accept a job offer.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000063/type/journal_articlesalary satisfactionrange–frequency (RF) theorycontextual effectswithin- and between-subjects designsaccepting job offers |
| spellingShingle | Michael H. Birnbaum Julien Rouvere Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction Judgment and Decision Making salary satisfaction range–frequency (RF) theory contextual effects within- and between-subjects designs accepting job offers |
| title | Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction |
| title_full | Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction |
| title_fullStr | Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction |
| title_full_unstemmed | Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction |
| title_short | Range-frequency models of within-subjects contextual effects: Salary satisfaction |
| title_sort | range frequency models of within subjects contextual effects salary satisfaction |
| topic | salary satisfaction range–frequency (RF) theory contextual effects within- and between-subjects designs accepting job offers |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000063/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelhbirnbaum rangefrequencymodelsofwithinsubjectscontextualeffectssalarysatisfaction AT julienrouvere rangefrequencymodelsofwithinsubjectscontextualeffectssalarysatisfaction |