Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation

The coupling of microscopic traffic simulation models with emission models offers a powerful tool for assessing and optimising traffic control strategies to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Although many studies use traffic simulation for emission analysis and designing traffic control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khatun E Zannat, Judith Y T Wang, David P Watling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Physics: Complexity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/adf682
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405710220132352
author Khatun E Zannat
Judith Y T Wang
David P Watling
author_facet Khatun E Zannat
Judith Y T Wang
David P Watling
author_sort Khatun E Zannat
collection DOAJ
description The coupling of microscopic traffic simulation models with emission models offers a powerful tool for assessing and optimising traffic control strategies to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Although many studies use traffic simulation for emission analysis and designing traffic control measures, most focus on calibrating a selected traffic model to replicate observed traffic flow. This raises a critical question: are the resulting optimal emission control strategies adequately designed to account for the sensitivity of traffic models in capturing vehicle dynamics and emissions? To address this issue, we compared three car-following models-the Krauss model, the Intelligent Driver Model, and the Wiedemann model-each rooted in distinct theoretical frameworks to understand traffic dynamics. We evaluated their performance in optimising road speed limits to minimise ( $\textit{PM}_x$ ) emissions in a school case study. A school was selected as the case because children are highly vulnerable and particularly exposed to pollutants during their school commute, and their exposure can be mitigated through optimal traffic control. Our findings reveal that, even when tuned to achieve comparable levels of traffic flow, the models displayed significant differences in their objective functions for traffic control optimisation. These discrepancies stemmed from variations in fuel consumption and particulate matter ( $\textit{PM}_x$ ) emission patterns resulting from the traffic dynamics captured by the selected traffic model. At a macroscopic level (e.g. average speed, flow, and density), the models exhibited minimal differences. However, at a microscopic level (e.g. acceleration, deceleration rates, and deviations from the mean), pronounced differences became evident. These results highlight that while certain traffic control strategies appeared less effective, revisiting and critically examining the limitations of the models is essential to ensure robust and tailored solutions for emission reduction.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2dd8aa2ad1d484082bbcfc14f2a450e
institution Kabale University
issn 2632-072X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Physics: Complexity
spelling doaj-art-e2dd8aa2ad1d484082bbcfc14f2a450e2025-08-20T03:36:35ZengIOP PublishingJournal of Physics: Complexity2632-072X2025-01-016303500710.1088/2632-072X/adf682Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisationKhatun E Zannat0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-5732Judith Y T Wang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-6413David P Watling2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-9121Institute for Transport Studies (ITS), University of Leeds , Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, West Yorkshire, United KingdomInstitute for Transport Studies (ITS), University of Leeds , Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds , Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9LG, West Yorkshire, United KingdomInstitute for Transport Studies (ITS), University of Leeds , Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, West Yorkshire, United KingdomThe coupling of microscopic traffic simulation models with emission models offers a powerful tool for assessing and optimising traffic control strategies to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Although many studies use traffic simulation for emission analysis and designing traffic control measures, most focus on calibrating a selected traffic model to replicate observed traffic flow. This raises a critical question: are the resulting optimal emission control strategies adequately designed to account for the sensitivity of traffic models in capturing vehicle dynamics and emissions? To address this issue, we compared three car-following models-the Krauss model, the Intelligent Driver Model, and the Wiedemann model-each rooted in distinct theoretical frameworks to understand traffic dynamics. We evaluated their performance in optimising road speed limits to minimise ( $\textit{PM}_x$ ) emissions in a school case study. A school was selected as the case because children are highly vulnerable and particularly exposed to pollutants during their school commute, and their exposure can be mitigated through optimal traffic control. Our findings reveal that, even when tuned to achieve comparable levels of traffic flow, the models displayed significant differences in their objective functions for traffic control optimisation. These discrepancies stemmed from variations in fuel consumption and particulate matter ( $\textit{PM}_x$ ) emission patterns resulting from the traffic dynamics captured by the selected traffic model. At a macroscopic level (e.g. average speed, flow, and density), the models exhibited minimal differences. However, at a microscopic level (e.g. acceleration, deceleration rates, and deviations from the mean), pronounced differences became evident. These results highlight that while certain traffic control strategies appeared less effective, revisiting and critically examining the limitations of the models is essential to ensure robust and tailored solutions for emission reduction.https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/adf682optimal traffic controlemission minimisationtraffic modelcar-following modeltraffic control strategyemission measurement
spellingShingle Khatun E Zannat
Judith Y T Wang
David P Watling
Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
Journal of Physics: Complexity
optimal traffic control
emission minimisation
traffic model
car-following model
traffic control strategy
emission measurement
title Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
title_full Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
title_fullStr Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
title_short Influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
title_sort influence of model selection on optimal control of traffic for emissions minimisation
topic optimal traffic control
emission minimisation
traffic model
car-following model
traffic control strategy
emission measurement
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072X/adf682
work_keys_str_mv AT khatunezannat influenceofmodelselectiononoptimalcontroloftrafficforemissionsminimisation
AT judithytwang influenceofmodelselectiononoptimalcontroloftrafficforemissionsminimisation
AT davidpwatling influenceofmodelselectiononoptimalcontroloftrafficforemissionsminimisation